Australia?
how comes India’s phalcons cost 1billion dollars and the hawkeyes 5 of them are less? whats going on? i thought the hawkeyes were the most advanced AWACS around
Originally posted by h177
In close combat TVC effect will not be able save such big duck from IRIS-T type of missle. plus RAFALE is a new design it has its sensors in built in the aircraft. RAFALE cockpit it is the closest cockpit you can get to F-22.
Wow so you have seen the inside of a F-22? i mean the way it will be when it comes into service with the AF? And wheres the info on Aspect ratio’s? flight characteristics? i Assume since your comparing aerodynamics and such, you know the lift curve slopes, and aerofoil sections used in both AC? Camber? thickness to chord ratio? oswald efficiency? CLmax??
I can!:p
and why is it useless? i mean why should they not have an AF in Bhutan?
Hmm come on!
So the fact that the mig was a unstable and hard airplane to fly in the first place has nothing to do with it?
lol i like that.
YEah i wasnt so sure about the F-16..i know the new ones are called the APG-80’s and the one one step lower in the order are 7X somethings..
yeah the AT-63 aparently uses the APG-67.. i didnt even know what a pampa looks like still dont..did a google cant find anything though.
maybe the PAF will fly them for a bit.or ex paf..
Indian MoD Statements on Missile Programs
(Source: Indian Ministry of Defence; issued Dec. 4, 2003) (edited by defense-aerospace.com)
Akash Missile Project:
The Government has not decided to discontinue the Akash Missile Project. The main objective is to develop medium range surface-to-air Missile with a range of 25 km.
There have peen some technical problems in the sub-systems which have since been rectified. In fact recent flight tests conducted were successful and user trials are planned next year.
Expenditure of Rs. 330.00 crore has been incurred so far on the project.
Rocket Launcher:
A proposal is under consideration for procurement of Multi Barrel Rocket Launcher System, PINAKA, indigenously developed by DRDO. Pinaka is developed by many development partners from Public and Private Sector Units, including Tata Electric and L&T for Launcher and Command Post Vehicle, OFB (Ordnance Factory Board) for Rocket and OFB and Bharat Earth Movers Ltd (BEML) for Loader-Cum-Replenishment Vehicle.
DRDO is a research and development agency only and not meant for commercial production.
DRDO associates with Private/Public Sector Organisations within the country for development leading to productionisation.
DRDO developed the technology for PINAKA and fabricated ground vehicles and launchers in the industry, who have the expertise and infrastructure for their production.
-ends-
Indian MoD Statements on Missile Programs
(Source: Indian Ministry of Defence; issued Dec. 4, 2003) (edited by defense-aerospace.com)
Akash Missile Project:
The Government has not decided to discontinue the Akash Missile Project. The main objective is to develop medium range surface-to-air Missile with a range of 25 km.
There have peen some technical problems in the sub-systems which have since been rectified. In fact recent flight tests conducted were successful and user trials are planned next year.
Expenditure of Rs. 330.00 crore has been incurred so far on the project.
Phil u a Squadi mate? Glitter?
well theres a post on Defence Aero, saying the MOD wasnt able to send protective “kits” to Iraq in time, and the soldiers had to do without its from a report by the national audit office.
things missing.
Body armour
Desert uniforms
NBC (nuclear, biological and chemical) gear
Aparently the MOD’s deployment system couldnt handle the numbers of kits needed to be sent.
It mentions that Challenger 2 tanks were only readied for desert warfare 3 days before but i dont think that is of much importance its no biggie..i dont think it would be but i am not in the service.
“while tanks and other armoured vehicles never received their protective NBC filters, the report said.”
It ends in a bright note saying that it was a success (militay) but that certain lessons have not been learnt from the previous ops going back as far as 1991.
hmm really?
oki..then why was the head of the EFA complaining bout the FCS and how it was handed to people without experience, i think ill watch the tape again..
Hi JA long time.. 😛
hope all is well with u dude..
Nice pic btw.. Just one thing, whats it doing??
hmm yeah the Dhruv is gonna perform ASW in the future.
Originally posted by ****Ant
Actually the X-31 helped the Germans a lot – the FCS was available to them and was the first fully fbw system they’d developed – and since they were the ones responsible for the FCS of the Typhoon you can now see exactly how important the program ended up being………especially considering the problems they had while making it – What would it have been like without the X-31?
Not any different! Germany still delayed in the FCS of the EFA iirc from the Documentary.. EFA: weapon of mass construction.
Originally posted by user
Towards Islamabad.
Are they celtic too? :confused: