dark light

matt

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,141 through 1,155 (of 3,292 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The Brand New IAF Thread (IX) – Flamers NOT Welcome #2406505
    matt
    Participant

    Well my point is what ever the ambiguity there is ambiguity! so before we go around say ooh its achieved this or that lets take a step back and wait for the correct information.

    Secondly the information of the speed wasnt in any paper or document that it is only reported in certain way with a certain load. its a news paper clipping in which there is not enough description or substance to judge anything usefull or meaningfull except that it reached a certain speed.

    in reply to: Indian Space & Missile Discussion II #1809070
    matt
    Participant

    Air Defence Missile System from Israel under CBI Scanner

    (Source: Press Information Bureau; issued December 9, 2009)

    Defence Research & Development Organization (DRDO) has undertaken joint development of missiles viz. Long Range Surface to Air Missile (LRSAM) for Indian Navy and Medium Range Surface to Air Missile (MRSAM) for Indian Air Force with M/s Israel Aircraft Industries (IAI), Israel.

    Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has registered a regular case relating to the procurement of Barak Anti Missile Defence System for the Navy in which M/s IAI, Israel is also involved. The case is pending investigation.

    This information was given by Defence Minister Shri AK Antony in written reply to Shri A. Elavarasan in Rajya Sabha today.

    -ends-

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode IX #2406944
    matt
    Participant

    What has ALENIA to do with the PAK FA?

    in reply to: The Brand New IAF Thread (IX) – Flamers NOT Welcome #2406957
    matt
    Participant

    It says it reached above 1350KM/hr but it does not really say at what altitude etc and if the tanks of the Tejas were empty, what it was carrying etc etc..

    too ambiguous.

    in reply to: The Brand New IAF Thread (IX) – Flamers NOT Welcome #2407571
    matt
    Participant

    I really can not see how the mirage upgrade prices can change drastically without effecting quality or delay the upgrade itself.

    in reply to: The Brand New IAF Thread (IX) – Flamers NOT Welcome #2408635
    matt
    Participant

    I can always say that MKI or latest upgrade X is untested in real war scenario with real smart opponent…

    Out of all the nations on the subcontinent and the near orient the IAF is the last outfit you would say are untested in a war scenario with real smart opponents.

    larges numbers would only get you so far.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode IX #2409345
    matt
    Participant

    Has it flown yet?

    matt
    Participant

    It probably already is, having one of the best Special Forces in the world helps, but it would mess up every other part of our armed forces. Simply turning all our existing troops into Special Forces would not only be incredibly expensive (training costs a hell of a lot to that kind of level), time consuming and downright impossible. They say 99.9% of people in the UK aren’t up to Royal Marines standard, imagine how few are fit to rate against Special Forces troops, even after training.

    The only way your “solution” would work would be to simply put special in front of all our current troops, it makes no sense or difference. It also means that the UK can not act independently at all or to act with partners for the majority of the time, like in the EU or NATO when normal troops or peacekeepers are needed. Can you really see the SAS toddling off to do UN peacekeeping ops?

    I cant i agree its semi daft but something needs to give and the people in charge cant keep cutting the budgets and sending our troops from the north pole to south and through tim buk tu as they say.

    You have (as most often is the case) have a very fair point.

    matt
    Participant

    I’m not sure what you’re aiming at here. Are you suggesting to somehow “upgrade” conventional forces into special operations forces (SOF)?

    As I understand it, an army should consist of a range of different types of units providing different capabilities (e.g. infantry, artillery, medical etc.) needed for the entire organisation to function according to the demands put on it. A special ops capability is just one piece of the cake.

    I fully understand and appreciate that, but with the economy going the way it is and the government reluctent to start national service. for the security of the UK and to keep its ability to punch above its budget (not its weight, if the money is there we can go toe to toe with most) i can only see a few options and one of them is the EU rapid reaction force or Army where in the UK is seen as the provider of special ops troops.

    in reply to: The Brand New IAF Thread (IX) – Flamers NOT Welcome #2410627
    matt
    Participant

    The network centric warfare systems of Indian defence will also include cognitive intelligence systems which can analyse the brain using sensors or even ultrasonic waves. This can be used in dealing with cases of espionage and army intelligence gathering. “We have begun research on at our life sciences laboratory. But it is still at an infant stage. A soldier’s mind can be monitored in real time”, he said. why is he making this public?!!!

    Mr Saraswat said technology is also being used in making weapon systems more tough so that it can withstand large shock loads and develop bunker buster systems which can penetrate deep into the earth.

    “This will increase efficiency in ground-to-ground attack, ground-to-air, ground-to-sea and even underwater attacks,” he said.

    http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/Indian-Defence-to-outsource-radar-work-and-battle-management-system/articleshow/5292420.cms

    Is it me or does a lot of this sound like promising the stars to deliver the top of a hill?

    What confuses me is what part of a bunker will be good in ground to air?

    matt
    Participant

    It wouldn’t work, any party that tried it would lose support. The better option would be to increase the size of the army and TA, and increase wages and living to make recruiting easier.

    No idea what your last point would accomplish except making our armed forces seem better than they are.

    Well i was just thinking if our poiliticians wanted the UK forces to be involved in the world than if we make our forces into specialist we could be sent in for those types of jobs.

    I mean looking at the numbers it seems as if Britain wont be able to fight a war on its own in anycase and will always be part of a NATO or EURO army.

    matt
    Participant

    The army doesn’t want conscripts. To increase numbers, even via conscription, it would need more money – and if it had more money it could get more recruits without conscription. For example, the TA has been cut in numbers by government decree, to save money, not because of lack of volunteers.

    Make it into a training thing, if you want to be an engineer then spend a month or so as an engineer in afghanistan or something as part of your degree similarly for media or doctors nurses etc etc.. take away all the admin roles and put them on civilians make the army into a fighting force and make the 1month a or similar into a compulsary thing.

    matt
    Participant

    It’s called a harmony guideline. You get rid of that and suddenly nobody wants to be in the Army anymore. Combat deployment takes its toll, so you have to give troops a chance to rest, then to retrain them before deployment etc.

    I forgot to mention that troop numbers can be bumped up a little by bringing in TA and reserve forces, but again, it’s a short term only thing. The TA do already provide a large number of support personnel.

    @Flubba: A lot of those mechanised troops are deployed even if the tanks aren’t. Some are filling infantry posts, with plenty more still acting as drivers etc.

    sounds daft but surely we should do national service in the UK i am a couch potato but i think if the country needs it they should be able to call me up for all my bad points and make use of me some ways.. cooking curry or something lol

    Or an alternative make all the soldiers into specialist like Marine Comandos or something, special operations or something.

    in reply to: "Beast of Kandahar" unmasked. #2411322
    matt
    Participant

    http://www.movable-type.co.uk/scripts/latlong-map.html?lat1=31.44741&long1=65.808105&lat2=36.668419&long2=53.613281
    Qandahar to Busher is about 1263 km probably a more interesting site than Tehran..

    in reply to: Indian Navy News and Discussions #2014363
    matt
    Participant

    Why not? If MMRCA and this new aircraft are diiferent (ex Mig-29K) than Indian military will be a showcase of world’s most of the modern aircrafts. :diablo:

    Hardly..

    also most modern aircraft according to whome?

    It will have a lot of very expensive paper weights not good for much because they would be tied up in strings by end user agreements.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,141 through 1,155 (of 3,292 total)