Maybe this is a good time for india to buy some Bronco’s and use them for training and COIN.
Hmm yes i am advocating buying US its ok i havent hit my head, this time it actually makes sense..
Or even buy the PC-21’s
I mean small turbofans for long range cruise missiles.
Well that should be the easiest technology of all, I helped a friend make a turbo jet in uni its realatively easy and your not really looking for anything more than say 2 hours of life so it does not have to be super survivable or anything.
So what else isnt there that would stop the private industry build UCAVs?
As long its not that monkey from Family Guy, you now the one? The evil Monkey?…A bit like the one that lives under my bed! Muahahahahaaaaaaaaa! :diablo:
😮 You mean mojo jojo?
have you tried?
i think it would be peanuts making it work
Problem is if you starting using peanutes to get peanuts you will have lots of monkeys everywhere..
a really really small nuclear plant, the size of a peanut..
Well last time i checked most peanutes were crunchy salted and roasted and contained a small amount of oil enough to heat a peanute size room for a few seconds but i wouldnt put a peanut as a air craft engine..
well you could but the peanut wouldnt get you very far.
Goooooo Peanuts..
We cant, at least not today…a critical tech we lack..a range of micropower plants..
What do you mean when you say micropower plants?
Simply put, when the IAF wanted more Mirage 2000Vs as the MRCA because of which people say the Gripen NG is closest to that requirement…things were different. The PAFs firm procurement plan was next to non existent and the PLAAFs vision was unclear. Now its known that the PAF will get Block 52+ Vipers and J-10s, but more importantly, the PLAAF is standardizing around Flanker variants AND deploying huge numbers of S-3XX SAMs. These make a Mirage 2000V style platform, even more modern, of limited use.
India needs an advanced bomb truck with sufficient loiter time, also able to defeat today and tomorrow’s PLAAF air to air assets with a wide array of affordable munitions.
I am not sure that the Gripen NG can meet that need.
The IAF need to think assymetric! instead of bomb trucks think, cruise missiles attached to UCAVS. Mass produced UCAV’s and cruise missiles have a few tens of thousands of them with a 2K+ km range
Indian private industry can build them today..
Do you really envisage a conflict with China before 2020 ? In that case it is very possible that only half of the MRCA would be inducted by that date as well.
Super Hornet or F 16. They have proved their worth in the SEAD role for ages and both are decent in Air to Air as well. The Rafale is also a great choice but then affordablity goes out of the window.
The way the rhetoric is hotting back up on both sides it wouldnt be suprising to see something happen in the next 10 years.
What the Tourists in the Maldives Don’t Know
Posted by Christina Mackenzie at 11/12/2009 12:20 PM CST
I have found myself a new assignment: I think I should go, in person, to Equator Village on the island of Gan, a 5km long by 3km wide patch of coconut palms and white beaches in the Indian Ocean island state of Maldives and check out the following information: India is installing radars there.
Few tourists know, and even fewer brochures reveal, that the Equator Village resort was the Royal Air Force’s officers’ quarters until 1976. Gan is the southernmost of the Maldives islands, just south of the equator, and it was here that Britain set up a secret naval base in 1941, building airstrips and vast fuel tanks to support its WWII fleet in the Indian Ocean.
“Asia Sentinel” an independent website, reports that now India is preparing to reopen the base to surveillance aircraft, helicopters, and possibly ships, to monitor Chinese vessels in the Indian Ocean. Under a deal signed in August, India is also installing radar across the Maldives, linked to its coastal command.
snip____________ read full at link
The Gripen NG is simply not enough against the PLAAF considering the future. We need something heavier, with more punch. Unfortunately (cost wise), only the Rafale and EF match up.
IAF needs to buy the Mig -35’s if they are that much cheaper than the EF 2000 then India will save money it can put into the MCA/FGFA/PAK FA or what ever when it buys its 126 aircraft.
What a muck! With the french getting over a long depression, the EF being too expensive, the U.S being unreliable, only the 35 and the Gripen are left.
I like the 35 being a fulcrum fan and all; but the Gripen NG seems v.promising -esp. with the possibility of doing a follow on MCA with SAAB. The IAF gets its much wanted diversification as well. Only trouble is the Gripen’s engine – US made ; perhaps they can buffer this with EJ-200s for the LCAs.
USS.
I have to say out of the list i would love to see these in Indian colours.
Gripen, EF 2000, Mig 35.
Strength in diversity (it is the Indian Airforce so why not make it as diverse as India).
Does the Indian government have any online petition sites like no 10 here does?
All i found was AK Antony’s email address
Why does it help the IAF to have a F-16 with a re-fueling probe? :s
dont get it..
dont under stand why the IAF should go for any of the US aircraft they offer a lot less in terms of bang for buck (allround including tech transfer and less strings attached) than any of the contendors.
and now that the keys to the trophy cupboard have been handed to China by Obama one has to wonder why India should buy US equipment to find it self having its string pulled by the US on behalf of the Chinese.
Will India really get the Aim 120D ??? hmmm
What happens when the Chinese raise “concerns” to the US about selling arms to India? It plays this game with Taiwan very often
“can UK get more bang for its buck if it took a different acquisition strategy, similar to India’s (say) ?”
You mean throw a tender for a training aircraft let it last for 2 years, dis miss it and start all over again but this time take longer?
Or the classic, throw a tender for artillary not make any decisions in the mean while denying your army of key equipment and making a supplier go bust.
Or maybe the RAF should go the way of the MMRCA?
Sorry couldnt resist…
I guess you meant that they should think of buying soviet/russian designs?
This is not meant to sound unecessarily jingoistic, no doubt indian posters will take umbrage, particularly at comments made in this post about air power. However, there is simply no doubt in my mind that any conceivable scenario involving the Typhoon and ther SU-30 on purely technical grounds would go to the British aircraft.
Not jingoistic only reality people should not have any reason to take umbrage at this..