dark light

broncho

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 785 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Agreement reached on INS Vikramaditya? #2095751
    broncho
    Participant

    The V-22 AEW will be perfect for CVF but seems a tad too big for ADS. If ADS can carry 3 then it would be perfect.

    in reply to: Agreement reached on INS Vikramaditya? #2095783
    broncho
    Participant

    CDG is a CTOL and the catapults that allow it to operate E-2c are the biggest advantage over Gorky. The current ADS size was arrived upon after eliminating designs the size of cavour and slightly bigger ones.

    in reply to: Agreement reached on INS Vikramaditya? #2095822
    broncho
    Participant

    Wrong again. Vik carries more aircrafts and can provide a more meaningful all around defense than cavour. Assuming 16 JSf’s on both Cavour can only carry 8 more helicopters. While Vik can carry 14 which lets it have a compliment of 8 ASW and 6 AEW choppers. Neither of the ships is a remote match for CVF or American super carriers but a decent AEW and ASW capability on vik would place it higher than cavour in my books.

    in reply to: Agreement reached on INS Vikramaditya? #2095842
    broncho
    Participant

    So if its the plane thats capable not the ship how does an F-35B carrying Cavour suffer in comparison to an F-35B carrying Vik?. Besides I didnt say that Cavour/F35B was ‘better’ than Vik/MiG-29K did I?.

    I said that Cavour was year-on-year going to be far cheaper to operate – which it is!. Then I said that, given an approximately equal sized fastjet airgroup, 14 F-35B’s vs 16 MiG-29K that Vik wasnt going to offer all that much extra capability – which it isnt!.

    What part of F-35B is not an option for IN is not clear to you? Secondly gorkys air group is going to be more than 16. Thats only a preliminary order. 20 is a good estimate but if N-LCA comes along it can carry more. The numbers also help Vik’ad carry ASW helis and more importantly Ka-31 AEW since neither cavour nor gorky can carry any aircraft based AEW.

    in reply to: Agreement reached on INS Vikramaditya? #2095871
    broncho
    Participant

    Yes but I am talking about IAC being built in Italy. It would surely cost IN a lot more than Gorky purchase or current IAC. The cavour is always going to be less capable than Gorky. Just transfer the F-35’s to gorky and it will beat the crap out of cavour with F-35’s. Its the plane thats capable not the ship.

    in reply to: Agreement reached on INS Vikramaditya? #2095874
    broncho
    Participant

    Comparing apples with air-conditioners here boys!!!.

    The Russian CVS is second-hand whilst the other designs mentioned are brand new. Cavour operationally, year-on-year, is going to be LOTs cheaper than the Vikramaditya!.

    Cant believe the Russians are still getting away with this!. I think even a French arms salesman would be impressed by the skills shown by the sales team here!!!

    The cavour is very limited. It needs STOVL aircraft and JSF is not an option for IN. A streched one might have been good but I would be surprised if it cost less than twice would gorky would cost.

    in reply to: Agreement reached on INS Vikramaditya? #2095934
    broncho
    Participant

    Cavour was $ 2.1 Bil without any aircrafts. CVF estimate is about3.5-4 bil, lets wait till it is actually built. Gorky at 1.2 Bil is still acceptable price, especially considering that Viraat is really really old.

    in reply to: India said mulling missile-shield work with U.S. #1788649
    broncho
    Participant

    May be I was not clear. DRDO has said that they will not and are not working with US towards ABM. Indian ABM will be their own effort. I am questioning the validity of the report itself. The russia/china card is a failed ploy to bring India onto their side but thankfully it will not work. Why would it ruffle russians? They have offered S-300 to both India and China. And china is irrelevant in this discussion, they simply cannot influence India.

    in reply to: Western vs Soviet aircraft in the same air force #2502850
    broncho
    Participant

    REgarding IAF’s choice of M2k vs Mig-29’s. They were meant for different roles. BEfore the MKI, Mig-29 would take care of Air superiority while M2k were meant for SEAD and strike. In IAF I don’t recall M2k’s being tasked with A2A riole that often. Even in kargil they were accompanied by Mig-29 for escort.

    in reply to: India said mulling missile-shield work with U.S. #1788654
    broncho
    Participant

    Its funny the americans or the poodles manage to see russian or chinese systems when they are not even mentioned 😀 . Talk about inferiority complex. The SM-3 may actually be a capable missile but the fact that India is even remotely interested in it is total BS. The source in this case I am willing to bet is Lockmart itself. Between Dr saraswats denial of Indo-US ABM cooperation and Lockmarts claim to the contrary, I am inclined to believe Dr Saraswat. Deal with your complexes anyway you want.

    in reply to: India said mulling missile-shield work with U.S. #1788663
    broncho
    Participant

    If it is a good missile keep it.:rolleyes: . Lockmart should stop humiliating itself by spreading lies. Especially when DRDO clearly called them out on it.

    in reply to: India said mulling missile-shield work with U.S. #1788666
    broncho
    Participant

    So what? The article is still BS. DRDO has cateorically rejected working with US on ABM. Why would they need PAc-3 when the development of AAD and Barak-8 is going on well.

    in reply to: India said mulling missile-shield work with U.S. #1788674
    broncho
    Participant

    😀 😀 BS as usual. Poor lockmart seems desperate to sell that crap to India. Dr Saraswat already denied any possibility of teaming up with US for ABM. The interest is one way. DRDO simply doesn’t want PAC-3.

    http://news.oneindia.in/2008/01/18/drdo-denies-us-help-for-ballistic-missile-defence-project-1200666868.html

    in reply to: IAF news-discussion October-December 2007 #2502991
    broncho
    Participant

    I doubt apache will ever be considered. LCH will make its maiden flight this year, that should put an end to this rubbish. The MI-35 are getting older and will need to be replaced in 5-10 years.

    in reply to: IAF news-discussion October-December 2007 #2503008
    broncho
    Participant

    http://ia.rediff.com/news/2008/feb/06plane.htm

    India, US sign landmark defence aviation deal

    In what is seen as a major breakthrough, India has reportedly agreed to buy six Lockheed Martin C-130J planes from the United States worth $1 billion. US officials say this deal paves the way for closer strategic ties between the two countries.

    The two countries signed the agreement on January 31 according to which, Lockheed Martin would begin delivering the Super Hercules turboprop aircraft from 2011, a US Air Force [Images] International Affairs official said on Tuesday.

    India has in the past relied heavily on Russia [Images] for arms and transport aircraft, and the US, bearing in mind China’s military prowess, aims to improve strategic ties with India following this landmark deal.

    Indian airmen would begin training in the US before the deliveries start, probably in 2010, US deputy assistant secretary of defence for South and Southeast Asia James Clad said.

    The Pentagon had put before the US Congress the possibility of this deal in May 2007, and had put the value of the deal at $1.06 billion.

    Lockheed Martin and Boeing, two of the biggest suppliers to the Pentagon, are currently in the midst of a bidding war with European and Russian aviation rivals to ink a potential deal to sell 126 new fighter aircraft to India at an estimated $10.2 billion.

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 785 total)