dark light

broncho

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 785 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Argentina and Brazil to develop nuclear submarine #2090512
    broncho
    Participant

    Will Chile join this common army? Will Peru, boivia and ecuador be ready to share an army? You still haven’t answered me as to who the common enemy or the threat is percieved to be?

    in reply to: India offered Kitty Hawk free if… #2494902
    broncho
    Participant

    No I believe scooter is right here. IN is plannin a fleet of 3-4 carriers about the size of CVF eventually. But the time line is not 2015 or 2020 but 2030-40. So currently IN cannot handle Kitty hawk. The crew required by Kitty hawk is enough to man 4 IAC’s or gorky’s.

    in reply to: Argentina and Brazil to develop nuclear submarine #2090649
    broncho
    Participant

    You need t do some reading, it will happen i can prove it to you.

    Brazil is at no more than 15 years to become an space fairing nation, with its own satellite launcher,

    they will have a locally made cargo aircraft the C390

    So ? It will be 11 or more likely 12th country to join the list congrats. How long before it can launch its on weather, comm and recon sats? It will take 3 decades easily. The c-390 is seems like a useful option but who is providing the engines?

    ,already Brazil has AWACs the R-99 ad light fighters the AMX, Argentina has built the CH-14 helicopter

    and has recovered the FMA from americans hands, they plan to have their own South american Banking system and create their own common currency, already Brazil has Satellites built with Chinese-Brazilian technology, Brazil very likely will stablish a United South america by 2030 and once the have full command of the nuclear sub technology and missile technology very likely the total independence of South american will be stablished.

    The R-99 is eyerie (swedish) fitted on the embrarer damn it! AMX was built with italian help and can brazil or SA make a fighter on its own? Yes, I would guess in 3-4 decades. Leave the CH-14 out it is a very basic light attack heli with more use in COIN or anti Drug warfare that real wars. But its a start, kudos to argies. The CBERS seems more of chinese initiative but if brazil can built its own satellites at a later date, good for them but again will take atleast a couple of decades to build comm sats. When exactly was SA not independent? The Nuke sub unless its a boomer seems of little use in maintaining a deterrence but again to reach there easily 3 decades.

    here are some Peruvian made sonda Rocket Very likely Brazil will lead a a south american space program

    here it is said Brazil and Argentina plan to build a satelllite togather[/B] Brazilian made VS-30 sonda rocket

    Brazil already leads the SA space program. Whats your point? Are you saying they will share it with other SA countries?

    Mercosur is South America’s leading trading bloc. Known as the Common Market of the South, it aims to bring about the free movement of goods, capital, services and people among its member states.

    It has been likened to the European Union, but with an area of 12m sq km (4.6m sq miles), it is four times as big. The bloc’s combined market encompasses more than 250m people and accounts for more than three-quarters of the economic activity on the continent.

    Mercosur was set up in March 1991 by Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay under the Treaty of Asuncion. The 1994 Treaty of Ouro Preto gave the body a wider international status and formalised a customs union.

    Brazil and Argentina are Mercosur’s economic giants. Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador and Peru are associate members; they can join free-trade agreements but remain outside the bloc’s customs union. Moves to include Chile as a full member were suspended after Santiago signed a free-trade deal with the US in 2002

    So you already have a member who will not join the SA union? YEs I can see that a FTA with local SA nations can be beneficial especially to Brazil and argentina but do you seriously see the block challenging US or EU economically in another 3-4 decades? I certainly don’t.

    in reply to: INS Vikramaditya delayed until 2011! #2090772
    broncho
    Participant

    That just seems BS

    For the extra money, the Russians have now agreed to:

    * Put in a new arrester gear for the planes : Baku never had arrestor gears so new ones were always needed.
    * Build a new ski jump for the MiG-29 planes : Again it never had one so new one was needed
    * Install new boilers in the engine room : Was a part of old deal
    * And lay new cables, estimated at 2,400 km : Was always going to be required

    in reply to: Argentina and Brazil to develop nuclear submarine #2090775
    broncho
    Participant

    i doubt they will attack again, i see no probability, however not because of the lack of weaponry in future years, in fact i think South america might become a military block and in future years might become a nuclear armed zone or at least a new military power, Brazil aims is to create a South american nation alongside Venezuela`s bolivarian revolution but with an economy as large as Germany or even Japan in the next 15 years.

    The first step theya re planing is keep South american for the South americans and that measn several nuclear submarines aircraft carriers and local made weapons already they have AWACS, light attack aircraft and soon to be joined by an Brazilian-Argentine made transport aircraft

    Ok you need to slow down. Whatever you said is not likely to occur in the next 3-4 decades.

    in reply to: Argentina and Brazil to develop nuclear submarine #2090863
    broncho
    Participant

    I doubt they would be stupid enough to try Falkland-2. It will take atleast a decade to get the SSN in water and another decade tobe proficient in using it. Moreover a couple of astutes will deter them.

    in reply to: Argentina and Brazil to develop nuclear submarine #2091029
    broncho
    Participant

    True chile just bought the scorpenes. Both Brazi and argentina have built subs, I assume french expertise is limited to installing a reactor on the hull. Its too early to speculate seeing no specifications have been released.

    in reply to: India offered Kitty Hawk free if… #2495497
    broncho
    Participant

    My BSmeter just went through the roof. Where exactly would Kitty be based? in the middle of the ocean or singapore perhaps:diablo: .

    in reply to: Argentina and Brazil to develop nuclear submarine #2091065
    broncho
    Participant

    So its just goin to be a SSN/ Any missiles being developed for it/ Or would it just use exocet?

    in reply to: Argentina and Brazil to develop nuclear submarine #2091236
    broncho
    Participant

    Maybe they do want boomers eventually and this is just a test bed. No one is going to help them build a boomer and they need to start somewhere.

    in reply to: Argentina and Brazil to develop nuclear submarine #2091335
    broncho
    Participant

    Hmm I would have assumed arentina would try to acquire a carrier first or some flat-top.

    in reply to: INS Vikramaditya delayed until 2011! #2091364
    broncho
    Participant

    PAK-FA naval will not be VSTOl it will have to be conventional take off like Mig-29k or su-33. Mig-29k (if it ever comes) and N-LCA will be enough to counter anything IN might face. I am including all rif-raffs like Su-30 downgraded model china has, J-10, J-17 or F-16 of PAF. They might not give a massive unbeatable advantage like F-22 but they are no pushovers.

    in reply to: INS Vikramaditya delayed until 2011! #2091987
    broncho
    Participant

    Amur has a good chance of winning despite IN not really liking it? Yes it can fire brahmos but is inferior to scorpene in every other way. I am not sure why 2 different sub lines are required? If MDL and DCN can fit brahmos on scorpene it is the ideal solution.

    in reply to: INS Vikramaditya delayed until 2011! #2092018
    broncho
    Participant

    If the gorky deal is canceled will the mig-29k’s also be refused? With IAC coming around 2012 only, there is ample time for N-LCA. What about the follow on Krivaks? There was some delay there too.

    in reply to: C-17s 7 and 8 for UK? another mystery buyer? #2497082
    broncho
    Participant

    Japan has C-X. I would be surprised if they wanted C-17’s. But you never know. C-17 for India makes no sense. they would most likely aquire more IL-76 at a later stage.

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 785 total)