It is a matter of fairness & consistency
fairness and consistency would be
1) waiting for the final report after appeals (innocent until proven guilty anyone? anyone?)
2) waiting for the final report on Boeing’s subsidies
NOT that ANYBODY thinks it is NECESSARY for Boeing to win.
The vigor with which the Boeing crowd pursues this says otherwise.
What you are missing is that Airbus COULD NOT get the loans through normal means.
so?
Even IF it could have otherwise, it would have cost significantly more to do so.
The loans were repaid WITH interest. The governments got more than they put in, even including opportunity costs.
In other words, Boeing has jack and squat to complain about
That is because Airbus/EADS does not have an army of enemies digging up & calling out every tiny little issue they are having
lolol, whatever you say
The USAF picked the KC-767 (& REJECTED the KC-30).
you’ve already lost that argument . . . repeatedly
care to be reminded again?
The KC-X Source Selection Team ‘selected’ the KC-30 BUT did not assess the relative merits of the proposals in accordance with the evaluation criteria identified in the solicitation is doing so.
1. KC-X Source Selection Team is the USAF
2. they did select the KC-30, not ‘select’
3. yes the gao found some flaws in the process, but remember they look at everything from a legalistic perspective. Just because there were flaws in the (very complicated) process doesn’t mean the ultimate selection was wrong.
Sign In
