Last week, while carrying my Orange 4×12 amplifier cabinet, which weights 100+lbs, I knackered the bicep tendon in my right arm which resulted in affecting my hand and fingers, very painful and most importantly, affecting my guitar playing. However, got a bit of that massage stuff done by G… my employer, and persevered & got on with playing the remainder of the shows.
On the flip side, great few gigs of the last part of the small UK tour (for now at least), intimate gigs are much better than the bigger ones. Back home this morning, back to work on Monday… Or Tuesday.
Mrmalaya, Lukos and JSR walk into a bar. Mrmalaya mentions a dogfight between a Fulcrum and a Typhoon, a b*tch fight breaks out between JSR and Lukos while Mrmalaya quietly sneaks away to the Juke Box and puts on Elvis’ Love me Tender. You’re evil, Mrmalaya. Tut-tut!
…but it will never be a good air superiority fighter (slow cruise speed, insufficient maneuverability) and its CAS capability is nonexistent. It also can’t function as the interceptor due to low missile loadout and low top speed.
Gets into DeLorean Time Machine, Flux Capacitor ready, time circuits set to: 20/08/1978, accelerates to 88mph, bright flash, flaming skid marks left behind, Flash-Boom-Whoooosh! GREAT SCOT!!!*… Re-appears moments later in similar fashion albeit Back to the Future of 01/07/2014… Yes, many, many people said the exact same things about the Harrier!
Ta-Ta!
Rock on, Marty McFly!
Personally, I find the extravagance of the RAF & MoD appalling. How can it be cost-effective to start retiring Typhoons which are only 12-15 years old? That’s barely old enough for an MLU for an aircraft in USAF or AdlA service.
Indeed. One often wonders if the ‘early retirement of Tranche 1 units’ plans were, or are just a committee thinking out loud with no clear view on how they were going about it. If that still is the plan, why bother looking into fitting Captor-E on the things. It doesn’t make sense. Taken this into account one can only assume the early retirement plans have been binned.
And United States are Roman Empire 2.0, and Russian Federation is Tsarist Russia 2.0…
Like I said to Nic, ‘Uuurgh. Your opinion is irrelevant on a Typhoon forum.’
Anyhow…
Regarding Captor-E and Tranche 1 units; I didn’t really think this Tranche would be looked at to be modified for Captor-E, pretty much assumed it’d only be Tranche 3 units and a few Tranche 2 units. Quite an interesting development.
It’s rather amusing seeing a couple of ill-informed, supposedly grown up, ding-a-lings, i.e. JSR & Lukos, arguing and actually taking their own gibberish seriously. What was that, Lukos? Bowl, tears, something else or another… Who’d thought you cared so much, no one else does… about you nor Sister JSR.
I need a new ugly stick to beat Trolls with, this one’s getting straight.
It did win the “competition” – it was selected.
I’m aware of it, however, context, the way those sources were reporting was that the F-35 was all but out of the competition, ‘no’ full purchases, ‘no’ reduced unit purchases, ‘no’ split buys as what it came down to in the end, the simple fact of the matter was they made themselves look rather silly be claiming it was is/going to be an outright win for the F-15SE, of which they were adamant. One remembers the reports Slowman was posting endlessly stating such claims, and they were considered to be rather “well informed” sources, too. Someone within those made a bit of mess.
Oh and, Lukos. Talk about “respect”, it ends where one flushes away what is put to them, respect was lost for you long before the name calling and I’m not the only one on here that has lost it for you. The number of members that have made it obvious speaks volumes, doesn’t it not. (There’s an insult referring to you in there somewhere, figure it out.)
Ta!
I’ve been rude only to people who’ve been rude to me, like EELightning.
Boo-Hoo, do write a letter of complaint. If you’re going to throw other people’s statements back in their faces you’re going to get little to no respect. We’ve all been wrong about something in one way or another, myself included, and the majority of us have been fine to had been corrected and took on-board what has been put to us. It’s those that doesn’t like being corrected and attempt to steer around discussions or try to word things differently to crawl out of the hole to make themselves feel better by having their head firmly wedged up their rectum, your stubborn point on CASAER/Captor-E being one example (ever wonder why industry and analysts refer to each radar as being totally different…And you call me and others “thick”….) and refusing acknowledge the likes of Sintra’s source being another example because you “couldn’t be ar$ed” to go through the effort checking it out. You most definitely fall into the latter category.
One will let member’s comments speak for themselves.
Dammit, man, what’s wrong with you? Anyone can make a mistake. Someone with a touch of moral fibre would say “OK, I got it wrong”, not make a stupidly transparent attempt to fake the record.
– Swerve.
Can’t be arsed and it’s still inconclusive because it doesn’t say whether they’re for the RAF or RSAF.
Or… You don’t want to be corrected more like.
But sadly travelling in the wrong direction.
Coming from someone that struggles to distinguish the differences between ‘First flight 2007’ and ‘First flight 3rd 2014’ with regards to CASEAR and Captor-E, whom of which last heard that the RAF ordered “260” Typhoons, seemed to didn’t know that the RAF will be receiving the F-35 etc. Yeah…
They were reporting on a developing situation. At the time of going to press, what they said was 100% accurate, so there’s no reason to doubt their credibility.
They were reporting on something that turned out to be nothing. Even DAPA (the decision makers) themselves turned out to be wrong as they were supposedly against procuring the F-35 and were, apparently, in favour of the F-15SE, this was widely reported. As it turned out it was bull-sh*te. Those sources have questionable credibility.
I wasn’t aware that you work in RAF logistics, Mr. Bull.
Nope, numb-nuts. One is just quite a bit more up to speed than you.
And it nearly did. If you remember the F-35 was eliminated from the first competition on cost and then a last minute problem was found with the Typhoon bid, and then they reopened and LM dropped their price.
Yet the simple fact of the matter is, the F-35 still got selected despite all the positive chatter about the F-15SE and the negative banter of the F-35. Claims, statements and accusations went out of the window at that point the F-35 was officially announced as the winner. ‘Nearly did’ [elimination] is a non-story.
Say what now?
You calling The Korean times article a source? [as well as the pdf rant?]
The Korean Times were 100% certain that the F-15 “Silent Eagle” was going to win the FX-III “competition”, reporting that the F-35 was all but out and had no chance of being selected according to their “ears inside”… Pretty much sums up their credibility.
but but but… :dev2:
Seriously, this sounds like a nice upgrade to an already capable aircraft.
Indeed. While TVNs would be a compelling upgrade, one believes that these modifications are much more compelling.
it is good that you drop reduced RCS EF claim.
It is amusing how you’ve failed to back up your claims.
Would you please F88king quit quoting him.
What is the point of an ignore function if people keep circumventing it by quotes?
But it’s ever so much fun. It’s like pistol-whipping a blind toddler. [Not that I’ve ever pistol-whipped a blind toddler].
I’m already up to speed, Queen. 160 is the number already in service. 232 have already been built in the UK but 72 were given to Saudi Arabia.
Hardly. What Swerve and Sintra said, Mr. Brains. Nice try attempting to dig yourself out of gutter though. Not.