dark light

EELightning

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,996 through 2,010 (of 2,664 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion 7 #2319629
    EELightning
    Participant

    India will never be totally in the American camp militarily because of its close relation with Russia.

    If India select a US type then expect a long & bumpy ride for the next 30-40 years. There’ll be a hell of a lot of paranoia from the US because of what you just said, close relation with Russia. It has already been stated by a couple of sources in the past few weeks that the US will not share some tech on the aircraft with India, how reliable those sources are is probably questionable but do not be surprised if they are correct & in more ways than one they probably are.

    Then theres the question of American weapons; what kind of access would India have with those? Would they be allowed to keep their own stock pile of US weapons on a particular base? Maybe, but having a stock pile of the likes of American cruise missiles stored somewhere on an Indian air base where Russian aircraft and possibly Russian boffins are, maybe not. This is where sanctions come into play and we all know that India are not very fond of those.

    To put it in simple terms; if the US are unwilling to share ToT and what not and India having very close military ties with Russia and wanting the freedom to do what they like with the winner, then the US types aren’t worth the effort of looking at.

    Do yourselves a favour and go for a European type.

    in reply to: The Great ModMil Libya Thread (Merged) #2321115
    EELightning
    Participant

    Er – no they aren’t. They’re the same distance away from Malta & Italy as they always have been. They’ve actually been advancing ESE along the coast, which moves the front line slightly further away from southern Europe.

    Stand corrected, the map I was looking at was creased in such a way that it looked like Libya was 3 miles away from Europe. Oops! 😀 But seriously, I was thinking too close, as in for him and his croonies. PM David Cameron stated this and seems rather concerned about it, especially now that we’ve offered some sort of help to the rebels and as we all know, Gaddafi – or how ever his name is spelt today – is rather fond of the UK, so much so “he” showed how much in the 80’s.

    And well said, Arthur.

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion 7 #2321263
    EELightning
    Participant

    Not to mention greater kinetic energy, speed and maneuverability near the end at its max range than AMRAAM’s max range.

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion 7 #2321381
    EELightning
    Participant

    @Aurel, no offence but you might want to do a little research concerning the AESA radar and maybe a few other things about the Typhoon. Even before the AESA enters operational service its already concidered a mature design. My understanding is that the Eurofighter users opted for it to be further developed to a mature status before its due to enter service, i.e. 2015. Hence why they’re still happy with its current radar, however, still thinking; lets not wait too long, eh. (Not sure what you mean by first generation AESA).

    The TVN’s, yep, it exists, but theres not much call for it as of yet. India might show an interest. Probably be introduced during a MLU programme.

    The Meteor, well the UK at least have an order in for them to arm the RAF’s Typhoons, France for Rafale, Germany preferred to wait for Meteor for their Typhoon’s hence why they didn’t bother to intergrate AMRAAM, Sweden wants it for their Gripens and theres a possibility Saudi Arabia wants them for their Typhoon’s and I believe Spain and Italy want them too. On top of that, I believe Gripen and Tornado has already fired a few Meteors during tests and I’m sure Rafale has at least flown with it. The Typhoon has I do know of.

    @Loke, our sense of humours missed I think. 😉 Scorpion82 might help you better on this than I could, but off the top of my head the T1’s were probably produced around early 2000’s with the T2’s and T3’s a few years later. Of course the T2’s and T3’s offer the better upgrade & growth potential than the T1’s hence why the British MoD want to sell them off to other countries. Theres nothing wrong with them in general, its just that the UK are keen on keeping their Typhoon up to date which means they’re interested in upgrading them in the future. Hence why they want T2’s and T3’s and not the T1’s. Just to add, the T1’s were always going to be the basic batch.

    The consortium members are likely to keep their Typhoon’s until they orginally planned to. Saudi Arabia have shown interest in ordering/upgrading current numbers to T3’s and possibly a second batch of another 70+. Be asured theres still more to come yet.

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion 7 #2321430
    EELightning
    Participant

    Wishfull thinking if anyone believes the SH will outlast the Typhoon in operational service. 😉

    The SH is a fine aircraft, no doubt about it, but theres very little left to do with it. It has more growth potential than the F-16 for sure, not much more. Given the chances, the likes of the Rafale and Typhoon have a lot more to offer for future growth potential, but like any other type in the world, they need deals such as the MMRCA competition to make it happen. It’s not that Europe don’t want to, theres just lack of funds. Same for the US and Russia too.

    in reply to: The Great ModMil Libya Thread (Merged) #2321434
    EELightning
    Participant

    Imposing a no-fly zone over Libya is “perfectly deliverable”, UK Prime Minister David Cameron has said.

    Mr Cameron, who attended an EU meeting on the country’s crisis on Friday, said his fellow leaders were “crystal clear” Col Muammar Gaddafi should go.

    He told MPs the Libyan leader was “brutalising” his people and there must be “no let-up of pressure”.

    But Labour leader Ed Miliband said the government had to “translate the ‘no-fly zone’ phrase into a plan”.

    Britain and France are spearheading moves to prevent further air attacks on rebels by forces loyal to Col Gaddafi.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-12735656

    On a personal note: I don’t believe its too late to impose no-fly zones, although I also believe that the longer “we” wait the more tricky it could become. However, the further the Gaddafi forces progress to the east of Libya the more likely we’re to see these no-fly zones in place due to the fact that theres a lot of built up areas in some particular places where civilian casualties will be of concern. Not only that, the Gaddafi forces are getting a little too close for comfort to the south of Europe.

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion 7 #2321521
    EELightning
    Participant

    I don’t think Antony will be inherently against buying an American MRCA. But if they are to win it will be on merits and or costs (bang for the buck) and not politics.

    “Bang for the buck”, now, hmmm possibly, “bang for the buck” for the next 40 years? Don’t hold your breath. The US types are just about passed their sell by date and theres at least two other aircraft in the competition that have a lot more to offer for the future.

    in reply to: Chance for Typhoons first combat deployment? #2323434
    EELightning
    Participant

    Iraq is doing very well now. It had a difficult phase before the surge. Now Iraq is great and much better than under Saddam.

    Libya 🙂 is next

    Excellent oppurtunity to pass the Typhoon as battle proven against Su 22s.

    And its taken, what, the best part of 20 years to get this far, better than it was yes, but far from perfect. Doing “very well” now is a bit optimistic. Iraq is not stable enough for the US to or any other country to leave.

    And its not important for the Typhoon to get an excellent oppurtunity to prove itself, its simply a tool designed to do this type of work, nothing more nor less.

    in reply to: Chance for Typhoons first combat deployment? #2323558
    EELightning
    Participant

    Yes, and now Iraq is a peaceful, stable, beautiful, non-violent, friendly country thats thriving with tourists…Its difficult to book into the Hilton Baghdad Hotel, the demand is incredible… :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Chance for Typhoons first combat deployment? #2323580
    EELightning
    Participant

    Best way is to bomb the **** out of Gaddaffi troops after estbalishing a NFZ and then use AH1Z or Appache to desotry the armour.

    WOW! Fantastic, problem solved!… :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Chance for Typhoons first combat deployment? #2323582
    EELightning
    Participant

    yeah, and they got arrested by the rebels and shown the door.

    😮

    Yeah, sent back home back to Hereford all cuddled in a corner shaking in their boots…I think not! They would have just got back into Libya a different way. They wouldn’t let little things like that stop them…They are there for members of the SAS and are a bit….Mad!

    in reply to: Chance for Typhoons first combat deployment? #2323600
    EELightning
    Participant

    The UK have the SAS on the ground in Libya, but nobody knows that. shhh… 😉

    If we send troops in, they’ll most probably be on a peace keeping role. But even that can be risky.

    in reply to: Chance for Typhoons first combat deployment? #2323602
    EELightning
    Participant

    This current situation, the Europeans or shall I say, UK and France, seem to be the ones that want to actually do something about it before it gets any worse. The US on the other hand, just seem to be half ar$ed about doing things. It wouldn’t surprise me, Fedaykin if the likes of UK, France and Nato do the ‘boring bits’, i.e. planning no fly zones, setting the wheels in motion, general paper work, fiddleing with paper clips and coming up with some sort of plan to do something about it, getting it approved, things get more interesting to play with things that go boom & bang…Then enter the US…Now lets do this way…

    It was a different story when George W Bush Moron MKII wanted to invade Iraq with the help of other countries…

    Anyway, about Libya. Watch the conference with Nato Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen on the BBC news about 40 minutes ago. Nothing much new, no real desicions made, just increasing naval ships in the Mediterranean and also announced that no fly zones will need more planning.

    in reply to: Chance for Typhoons first combat deployment? #2323719
    EELightning
    Participant

    If they send the Raptor, then the USAF can prove the stealth concept. I mean wasn’t that the selling point, doing CAP’s without caring about airdefense ?:diablo:

    F-22 pilot: Libyan pilots are ignoring our requests to stop bombing and its too expensive to use my weapons system & Obama is a bit of a wet…
    Gaddafi: There was no CAP aircraft on our radar, so we took advantage of it and bombed my people!
    Typhoon pilot: *sigh* FFS I’ll do it!

    Ah the disadvantages of “stealth”. :diablo: :diablo: :diablo:

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion 7 #2323997
    EELightning
    Participant

    Shortlist for A2A capability: EF-2000, Rafale, Gripen NG.

    Shortlist for A2G capability: F/A-18E/F, Rafale, F-16IN.

    Shortlist for multirole capability: Rafale, F/A-18E/F, Gripen NG.

    Shortlist for price and cost: MIG-35, Gripen NG, F-16IN.

    Shortlist for political relation: F/A-18E/F, F-16IN, MIG-35.

    Interesting opinion, certainly throws spanner in the works. So what about shortlists for ToT on offer, platform growth/upgrade potential, aircraft performance, long term costs, what has already been offered by the contenders etc?

    Pretty much got the first and last ones right, costs are debatable, A/G and multirole capabilities are certainly debatable…A lot of people seem to think the Typhoon is a one trick wonder. It’ll be a lot more capable than a lot of people think it will, especially since the IAF will have the Tranche 3 variants.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,996 through 2,010 (of 2,664 total)