dark light

EELightning

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,246 through 1,260 (of 2,664 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Rafale Thread #13 #2300130
    EELightning
    Participant

    Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz…

    @TMor , stop looking down on me and keep quiet .

    For once I actually agree with him. But if you stop talking such nonsense then maybe you’d get a bit more respect from a lot of people including your fellow countrymen.

    I like to read upon the Rafale however, you’re the last person I’d want to get knowledge from, well you’re slightly better than Dare2, and even that doesn’t classify as a complement, and claiming the same Gibberish over & over again is getting rather repetitive.

    You’re entitled to your opinion but as I say, its a pity for you that it isn’t factual.

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon News & Discussions VI #2300143
    EELightning
    Participant

    This is from February this year, I totally forgot about it until now:

    The year began, as many others have, with an assortment of radar, weapons and defensive equipment trials as a prelude to Trial HIGHRIDER. However, the focus soon changed with the Typhoon’s deployment to Italy and Op ELLAMY. In the first weeks, the Sqn worked around the clock to deliver key software updates to improve survivability, before testing began on improvements to weapons, communications and targeting systems. Over the course of the Operation, 17 (R) Sqn delivered in excess of 9 formal Trial Reports as well as other essential tactical advice to the Front Line.

    Concurrently, a small team made it out to the USA on Trial HIGRIDER to ensure that long term development of the Typhoon continued and best use of this unique resource was made. Testing with the US 422nd TES yet again provided valuable feedback on Typhoon capability in coalition operations.

    After ELLAMY, the Sqn had to pick up those trials postponed earlier in the year.

    It was business as usual back in the UK, with further development of Typhoon software. Ground and flight testing of the latest radar standard, T2P, has delivered new software to the Tranche 2 fleet, improving Typhoon capability, and directly supporting
    northern QRA.

    Throughout 2011, the Helmet Equipment Assembly (HEA) went through thorough testing on the aircraft by the pilots and staff of 17, in particular Frankie “Awesome!” Buchler who was particularly taken with the capability introduced. This work culminated in the Front Line squadrons starting their work with the new helmet towards the end of the year, introducing a significant step forward in capability.

    17 has also been closely involved in advancing and developing the weapons and aircraft systems for the Typhoon of the future. This has included work on the METEOR missile system, trials involving Passive Infra-Red Airborne Tracking Equipment and future radar and defensive aids systems. Most of this work has been completed while working closely with industry, a relationship that is vital for us to get what we want in the future. Certainly, the Squadron has spent many days at Warton, either flying the most recent software loads in the BAE Systems’ test aircraft or in the simulator. This work has been hugely beneficial.

    Spinning Up For 2012

    With the Typhoon having accomplished much in 2011, many more questions are being asked of the fleet for 2012. Moving through January the agenda is already packed full of new challenges for the team to tackle.

    HIGHRIDER in the spring will take 17 and its aircraft out to the US. An abundance of resources, airspace and assistance from the USAF makes HIGHRIDER an invaluable detachment for the Squadron. Several trials including essential work with the Defensive Aids Sub-System, will be carried out during the detachment, as well as full testing of a new software standard in an operational environment that can only be emulated in
    the USA.

    It is of course, the year of the London Olympics and the TES will have a heavy Olympic involvement. In direct support of the Olympic team the Sqn XO is already in full trials swing, testing the latest in sprinting spikes and aerodynamic lycras. Fleet wide reports (with photos if allowed by the regulator) will follow in the coming months.

    2012 has already seen changes in the squadron, with a few of the team moving on; Sqn Ldr Weekes, Flt Lt Ball, Flt Lt Saunders, Flt Lt Steel, Flt Lt Waskett-Booth and Fg Off Walker. All were invaluable members and each have the best wishes for the future from everyone
    at 17.

    There have also been new additions to the team. 17 Sqn would like to welcome Sqn Ldr Kilvington, Flt Lt Forbes, Lt Humphries, Flt Lt Bartlett and Flt Lt Rennie. Good luck going
    into 2012.

    Finally congratulations to Sqn Ldr Will Saunders and Flt Lt Nic Saunders on their new arrival, Amelia Kathryn Elizabeth Saunders, who is already being tested on Typhoon system knowledge.

    Capability upgrades, ventures overseas and a fresh and budding new team will set 17 (R) Squadron up for another eventful and successful year.

    http://www.onetooneonline.co.uk/sqnnews/17r-sqn-running-the-gauntlet/

    Copyright 2012, One-to-One Online.

    in reply to: Rafale Thread #13 #2300152
    EELightning
    Participant

    I hate to repeat myself but the Typhoon is 0.5 generation ahead of the M2000 (and on steroîds) and the Rafale is a whole gen ahead of the 2000 .

    Now , I am not saying that the people who made the Typhoon are wank..s , they only had it wrong from the start , they did not foresee the futur , they lacked knowledge on some key factors and the 4 Nation ‘s partnerchip was a mistake , leading to a lack of fundings , will , understanding and mutual goals .

    Pity for you that your opinions aren’t factual.

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon News & Discussions VI #2300274
    EELightning
    Participant

    Eurofighter Typhoons of the Italian Air Force (ItAF) have replaced the last of the air forces’ F-16 jets to leave the Typhoon solely responsible for the defence of Italian airspace. Entering into service in 2004 and now operational with four Typhoon Squadrons (Gruppi) across both northern and southern Italy – two at Grosseto air base and two at Gioia del Colle – Eurofighter is, from today onwards, the only air defence asset in the Italian Air Force.

    http://www.eurofighter.com/media/news0/news-detail/article/info-eurofighters-take-full-responsibility-defending-italian-airspace-replacing-f-16s.html

    in reply to: BAe Signs $3B deal for trainers #2301591
    EELightning
    Participant

    Wonderful news for Blighty and Saudi Arabia. The number of new aircraft are certainly adding up to the previously stated 450-500 units figure. One foresees the RSAF with a lot of Typhoons in the future.

    in reply to: Rafale Thread #13 #2302134
    EELightning
    Participant

    In all fairness MICA at 100km should be out of energy, it would probably not be able to follow a plane doing an evasive turn at 3G. Newer AIM-120 can also do LOaL.

    French Navy Rafale pilots recently stated that AMRAAM had a better PK in relation to their Mica.

    I think you are right there. In the WVR arena Rafale is dominating. I slightly better at BVR (SPECTRA, RCS) and hugely superior in the WVR arena. Which means it is superior overall.

    Really? The same French Navy Rafale pilots above seemed to have thought rather differently to you after they recently went up against Italian Typhoons.

    in reply to: POLL, on including forum member names in topic #2306117
    EELightning
    Participant

    Do away with it. Its silly and can be rather provoking for some. Theres no point to it and brings nothing to the thread – I don’t want to see my user name on a thread title.

    Just keep it simple.

    in reply to: AVIC JF-17 Thunder versus SAAB JAS-39 Gripen #2306151
    EELightning
    Participant

    neither has F-22 ever seen combat, doesn’t mean it’s no good 😎

    I never said it wasn’t.

    in reply to: AVIC JF-17 Thunder versus SAAB JAS-39 Gripen #2306161
    EELightning
    Participant

    so in other words, Typhoons are still unproven in aerial combat :p how do you think can fare against Thunders?

    And the JF-17 is proven in A/A is it?

    You don’t think these things through do you.

    in reply to: AVIC JF-17 Thunder versus SAAB JAS-39 Gripen #2306211
    EELightning
    Participant

    In what ways?

    There were no A/A encounters during the Lybian Campaign.

    in reply to: AVIC JF-17 Thunder versus SAAB JAS-39 Gripen #2306214
    EELightning
    Participant

    Target practice for the Tiffies it is then. *Yawn* :diablo:

    in reply to: AVIC JF-17 Thunder versus SAAB JAS-39 Gripen #2306218
    EELightning
    Participant

    give me a ring when Typhoon finally gets DSI air intakes 😀

    Give me a ring when the JF-17 can supercruise, can perform at high supersonic regimes, has HEA, Meteor, ASRAAM/IRS-T, an AESA with 1,400+ TR Modules coupled to a WFoR Repositioner and a Flux Capacitor.

    in reply to: AVIC JF-17 Thunder versus SAAB JAS-39 Gripen #2306262
    EELightning
    Participant

    Typhoon’s technology is at best a match for that of Thunder Block 2

    Oh please, do go into more detail.

    *Dishing out Troll sweeties*

    Noo.. Please take. We will also give you money to train your pilots and buy you fuel. Please accept our kind gesture.

    Hmmm? It would go with my fake Chinese Rolls Royce after all.

    in reply to: AVIC JF-17 Thunder versus SAAB JAS-39 Gripen #2306278
    EELightning
    Participant

    Thunder Block 2 is equipped with AESA and IRST similar to those of J-10B. It is amongst the best jets in the world and more advanced than Griffin C.

    Yet still are “free”.

    I’ll stick with the much better Typhoon thank you very much.

    in reply to: AVIC JF-17 Thunder versus SAAB JAS-39 Gripen #2306290
    EELightning
    Participant

    LMAO 😀 China delivering Thunder Block 2 jets to Pakistan for free.

    They’re that good, aye? :rolleyes:

Viewing 15 posts - 1,246 through 1,260 (of 2,664 total)