Australia: Nil
The Kh-101 image looks like it has miniature props at the very rear (item 23), or are they just additional control fins?
No more close up shots of the A-20, sorry. I will put the other two I have later. But they are not as good.
More A-20 shots
More photos (Fairly big)
The second last one is of me and one of the RAAF F/A-18B Hornets.
The real world is full of idiots, why should the virtual world be any different? If one spends enough time online you soon learn to live with them. π
Those raids were over the Romanian oilfileds and then on into Russia as well, and I think the escorting occured when they flew home after their raids, for at least part of the way home anyway.
Bugger, I missed this one, at work all day. It was pretty easy too. %$@#@$… π
Wow, this thread is still going! Amazing.
Well, hopefully they will hand off AvP2 to a more competent director.
James Cameron? π
He has been quiet lately.
The decoys are mentioned in the Norman Polmar & K.Moore book Cold War Submarines: Design and Construction from USSR and USA 1945-2001. So I wonder where they got the info from.
If the decoys are powered to fire some way from those tubes the sub could then turn and speed away from the explosion, it would not have to keep sailing straight toward in incoming torpedo.
They probably can, but they might be able to carry four of the new Light weight weapons. As opposed to just two Kh-35s.
what if by late 1943, the Soviets and the Japanese had a large scale war around the Hokkaido, Sakhalin & Kuriles region. In this scenario the Soviets are mainly land based with numerous air bases and army already positioned on the islands and Japan launching air strikes from Hokkaido and using what remains of their carrier force to reach more distant areas like Kuriles.. who would win and would the Soviet aircrafts (aka MiG-3, Yak 1-7, Lagg, Il-2, etc) stand a chance against Ki-84s, etc
Looking at this objectively. I doubt the Russians could have afforded any additional combat experienced divisions to a re-newed conflict with the Japanese in the East. And it is unlikely this scenario would have happened anyway as the Japanese could ill afford weakening their position in the Pacific, let alone diverting air force resources north. The latter would have relieved pressure off US bombing raids on the Japanese homeland that started at the end of ’44.
If this large scale conflict with the Russians in Northern Japan had happened and lasted more than a year, American raids on Japanese industry would have eventually bled the Japanese defenders dry of crucial armaments. As already mentioned, the Japanese were in NO position to fight on two fronts. They would have lost to the Russians too. On a side note, the Best Japanese fighters would have been more than capable of taking on Russia’s best, if flown by skilled/experienced pilots.
Coming together nicely. π
DF-31A
From the NRDC Nuclear Notebook: http://www.thebulletin.org/issues/nukenotes/nd03nukenote.html
“China is also developing a modified version of the DF-31, the DF-31A. With an extended range of up to 12,000 kilometers, the DF-31A is sometimes confused with the DF-41, now canceled. Its precise range is unknown. Deployment is predicted to occur between 2006 and 2010. It may replace or supplement the DF-5A. According to the CIA, the DF-31A may be targeted against the United States and be tested βwithin the next several years.β With a shorter range and a lighter payload than its predecessor, the DF-31A will be less capable of penetrating a potential U.S. missile defense system.”
If budget permits, Taiwan’s military plans to produce six such cruise missiles each year at a cost of 100 million Taiwan dollars (2.94 million US) apiece, the daily said.
Only six?? I think this might be a mistake. Maybe it should be 60/year?