Can’t seem to find it anywhere. Could be an independent US Army project drone.
It’s true, look at that list for yourself and you’ll see.
Anyone have any other prices to contribute to the list?
I did, and I saw $198 million for the C-17. I seem to recall you stated elsewhere that this price for the C-17 was accurate.
Not sure Google.
The second missile looks different. Could it be a JL-2 test?
submarine launched from a dedicated 949M modified “Oscar” class submarine
I am trying to visualise how big this modified 949M would have been to accomodate the P-750. 😮
Well we don’t all have the chance to fly anything military related…… :p :p :p
i’d be pretty happy standing next to the flanker
Ditto! I aspire to get that close to one…. 😀
Great photo Jai!
I think for a Scramjet powered vehicle it’s perectly feasible.
Have got IAPR Vol.12 in the mail right now, can’t wait…. 🙂
On the MiG-37 tag, I would believe it, as the improved 2nd gen MiG-29M was dubbed MiG-35.
There can be no sour grapes when bashing Venik. He’s a free target for all!
Have been aware of Venik’s site for ages now Arthur, but how did he get to be such a target?
No, it’s like PAF Fan said. All IDF/AF planes for example are officialy USAF birds, until their first landing in Israel.
About the AIM-9X. I find the statements in the article on the AIM-9X as the best short range AA missile as a bit disconnected from reality.
American boasting……….. :p
AIM-9X was a joint program, and I suspect they are talking to the USN officer in charge of the their side of the program, that’s all.
outdated, inaccurate, badly put together and etc.
Gee, you are pretty harsh for a teenager! At least he has a website with the info in tables. I smell sour grapes……… :p 😉
Good photos, and good to see the FULCRUM back in production. I would love one of their jackets with ‘RSK MIG’ written on the back of it. 🙂
Reeeeally flimsy pylon.
Could not agree more Arthur! The EC-130V of the USCG has what should be a firm fixture. I think this pic is a fake.
The EC-130V