Unless the Mig-29K is fitted and tested for CAT launch, which it hasn’t, then I think the ADS will still be a STOBAR design. And what experience have the Italians had with CAT design on carriers?
But lets not forget the Mirage 2000N uses the ASMP stand-off cruise missile for the nuclear role. And it was never designed in the European context to be a deep striker, that I believe, was the old role of the much larger Mirage IV. The new ASMP-A will effectively double the range of the original ASMP at altitude; out to 500-600km.
Not sure Kilngsor, but I would have my money on the builder. 🙂
PhantomII,
The ESSM is quite capable of engaging targets close in or out to it’s max range. And when I thought about an airborne equivalent of ESSM, I thought why? Current missiles – like the AIM-9X – can do the job just as well against close in targets. Now, when you talk BVR, again why would you need an ESSM equivalent? AMRAAM uses active seeker terminal guidance and is fire and forget, while the ESSM uses CW terminal guidance like the old AIM-7. But like I said the AMRAAM can also be used effectively against targets fairly close in, where it would go active almost from the moment of launch.
There is no airborne equivalent of ESSM.
Yuck indeed! Artistic license – to kill! 😮
The MK.IIF Night Fighter was fitted with Merlin XX. I wonder if No.2 is one of only two Merlin X powered original Mk.II prototypes, as there appears to be a clear lack of unit serials. Perhaps under going trials?
Speedy and well armed it might have been but at high altitude it would have sucked surely. Probably would have an awesome roll rate and would have been generally very agile, but I suspect more as a short ranged low-medium level fighter-interceptor, in anticipation of US fighter and medium bomber sweeps over the mainland during the Invasion that never happened.
Although India purchased a ‘Green Pine’ radar from Elta in 2001 and has expressed interest in deploying its own battery of Arrow interceptor missiles, U.S. concerns regarding compliance with the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR, an international agreement limiting the proliferation of ballistic missile technology, have effectively halted such plans for the time being.
Eh? The ARROW is effectively a SAM system, albeit designed to shoot down ballistic missiles. Are they worried the Indians might turn the ARROW into an SSM? The Indians already has long range SSM programs. What is this MTCR concern with the ARROW?
Wow. That’s pretty cool.
Is there an air-launched equivalent to the ESSM?
I mean in terms of seeker performance, fuzing, etc.
Perhaps the AIM-7P?
I don’t think you would need it. AIM-9X and the likes are very effective new WVR weapons. And AMRAAM at close range, say, within 10km, is very deadly and would be very hard to escape from.
Saw them in action on the news tonight. Greek security footage for the games.
The problems (and cost probably) with simply fitting the AL-41 to the Su-35 is probably why they are adapting the AL-41 tech with a hybrid AL-31 engine, i.e. the AL-41F1 as it appears to be known.
The ESSM has been designed, as another evolution of the RIM-7 series, to better handle the new generation of high speed anti-ship missiles first and foremost. The quad pack fitting is brilliant too, gives you an amazing ripple fire effect if you have multiple inbound targets, provided the ship can handle all the tracks.
Looks like some kind of inflatable, possibly even deployed off the Frigate itself.
Isn’t max tactical/quiet speed 20 knots?
Probably Google, but I was saying that at 40kts the 2nd generation Papa class SSGN is probably going to make more noise than the SEA WOLF at the same speed.
They had a go at the Me 163 Komet too.
The Mitsubishi J8M Shusui
