Great shots! Can’t wait to get them downunder, hopefully in time for Avalon next year.
Ok, no.3 is the Focke-Wulf Fw 57.
They look like night lights, or something like that.
B-17B is correct!! And so is the Hellcat! Well done guys. But..
I believe the answer is a B-29 but not any Recon aircraft. I think it was the 77 aircraft dispatch for the first Air raid on Japan since Doolitltles Raid.
Not right for #1.
I will post the remaining answers soon.
What is rare is a pic of an Me 262 with unit insignia (in this case JG7), most of them were anonomous and didn’t carry unit specific symbols. I think Yellow 7 has been modelled a few times by different model manufacturers. Nice pics!
Sorry to dive back in time again, but if you consider air defence networks, and linked interceptors you have to go back to WW II. I know that datalinks, in their true sense, did not exist back then and everything was done via radio, but the concept was the same.
In the Battle of Britain a lot of inboud German formations were detected miles out on British radar and their position was relayed to central Fighter Command, which then relayed the scramble order to the appropriate sector. In Germany later in the war, the Nachtjäger (Night Fighter) defence network was a marvel. The defence ‘Net’ for the inbound British bombers was divided into small sectors, each sector would have a single night fighter on constant airborne patrol (usually twin engined high endurance types). Once the British bombers had been picked up on German radar, the intercept order was given to the Sector(s) concerned, and fighters vectored to the kill.
The emergence of the datalink is simply an advancement upon a concept born over 60 years ago.
“The opportunity to fly against the aircraft that is considered Naval Aviation’s percentage threat, the MiG-29, was truly a once in a lifetime event and is sure to be the highlight of the cruise for everyone who participated,” he said.
I wonder if they called the RAAF for some tips on what to expect from the RMAF Fulcrum crews. And it is RMAF, not RAF. I am sure some in the RAF would love to have MiG-29s, but they can dream. 🙂
First Flying Fortress.
Was it Y1B-17 later called YB-17 (S/N36-149) accepted Jan 1937.
Phil
Phil,
Y1B-17s #36-149 to 36-161 were all evaluation machines, not production standard models.
In any event, 50 MiG-29s sounds like a high number, I wonder if tey would not be better off with a slower su-25 type of aircraft or Hawk, no high performance fighter such as the MiG-29 will be needed in te region.
And the F-16s are there for…? Is air defence not a concern?
I guess, but why develop an Su-27 upgrade now and not in something like 2010-2015 timeframe.
Because the FLANKER has been in service with the RuAF for twenty years. It’s overdue.
Great story ARC LIGHT. I enjoyed it emensely.
3 The first Fortress ordered -Model299 on 26/9/34 flew 28/7/35 from Boeing Field with Les Tower as pilot Crashed at Wright Field in October ’35 killing pilotMajor Pete Hill, observer Les Tower (observer) also died. Fault- control surfaces still locked on take off. Reg N.13372 Boeing No. 1963.
Am I anywhere near?
dakota 2
X-13372 as it’s experimental civil registration had it, was the very first prototype. I am after the first production model that was actually handed over to the USAAC for service use. You are correct on No.4 and No.5 though.
Some captured aircraft
This might help: http://www.pacificwrecks.com/
Big beasts. Always loved the Russian Kirov-class CGN. Brute Force!
The middle weights. I love the Spanish F-100, always have, mainly because I think it is the best bet for the RAN and their AAW requirement.

The little friends. Anything MEKO. Like the new South African corvette.

The Subs. For looks, got to be the Akula-class. Even with the pod!
