With regards to Vietnam’s political position, do you guys recall President Putin’s visit a couple of years back with the re-newed Russian interest in Cam Rhan Bay as a port-of-call/basing facility for the Russian Navy. The USN is using Singapore in much the same way now. I too don’t see much other than Russian a/c been purchased by Vietnam in the near-to-medium term future at least.
someone wanted to know about the modified sunburn for the PLAN’s 956EMs.
“In Kanwa Information Centre’s “Report on Russia-China Cooperation in Naval Technology” released in June 2003, Kanwa exposed for the first time that 956EM DDG would be fitted with the 240km-ranged 3M80MBE upgraded version SSM.”
Thanks Google, that was me. 240km range eh. Nearly twice the original range of the stock 3M80. With the 3M80MBE, I am pretty sure the ‘M’ stands for the Russian word meaning modernised/or modified. The ‘E’ probably for export. But what of the ‘B’?
Don’t know if anyone posted this yet, but there was a short article in last week’s issue of AW&ST.
Here are the highlights IIRC;
1) They said it was a mistake to mount their first effort, the rotodome, on the Avro HS-748 passenger jet instead of a transport plane like the IL-76.
2) CABs wishes to restart the program but with a mini-AWACS type of phased array radar (that is under development) to be mounted on a regional jet. If they had wanted a larger awacs, they would’ve gone for Boeing or foreign product.
3) They are seeking foreign assistance, and have already contacted an Israeli company (I forget the name) and are seeking a Russian one. They need help on integration, ECM (I think), and some other issues.
My memory’s a bit hazy, but I think that’s everything.
I am assuming this is the domestic program? And what of the PHALCON deal with Israel?
The XAAM-5 looks like an IRIS-T clone. The XAAM-4 is also in my opinion heavily influenced by the AIM-120’s design. I see the Japanese are still doing what they do best; imitate. π
Shturmovik, ooooohhh, me like π
But I can’t see it being of the same class as the WWII classic or the A-10 or Su-25. Simply can’t see them hanging enough armor on the Yak-130’s airframe.
Maybe not, but add a titanium/kevlar bath tup for the cockpit, some added armour around other vital areas, add a large calibe cannon, and you have the makings of something pretty good I think. Of course it all may require a better engine and some redesign work, but the various combat aircraft evolutions in the diagram appear to be new designs anyway based on original Yak-130.
Also, on the production issue. Even if Irkut don’t have production rights, they surely own the patent for the design now with the purchase of the Yakolev OKB. This would mean they would get a percentage in royalties (at least) from any sale of the Yak-130 woud it not?
That one’s not yet out for the public, Glenn. However, the NLCA and TLCA both have reduced internal fuel compared to the conventional Land based version.
The naval LCA with reduced internal fuel? Based on the twin-seater, I guess thats no surprise. I don’t think it will be taking off mission-loaded, WITHOUT a couple of drop tanks. Judging by its size I would guess at an internal fuel load of probably not much more than 2-2.5 tons.
Harry,
What about the internal fuel load? π
@GDL
The Kh-59 is a real stand off missile, its normal that China purchased some of them and they can also be equipped with image intensifierβs to work at night, for a weapon of such a class, this guidance method is the only way, the Chinese can like it or not.
It was a tounge-in-cheek comment by me really on the Kh-59ME. Although TV guidance is not the only guidance method for 100km+ class stand-off weapons.
Which Agat seeker does the Russian R-77 use? And will they improve it for the R-77M I wonder…
Perhaps Irkut Co.’s marketing power will help it promote and eventually sell YAK platforms. Since they now own YAK, they have a vested interest in selling them.
I found a few….
Can someone I.D. them?
The last part of the article talks about future development as pushing the range in future missiles to 300-400 kms π
GD, really appreciate the translation on the info. The thing about this kind of range is that it’s not ground breaking. The Russians have the capability right now with the boosted KS-172 from Navotar. I just wonder if the Chinese will start something new, or ride the coat tails of another foreign program.
And who said Mach 4 is a bit low? Isn’t that AMRAAM/R-77 speed?
MiG-29K/KUB will probably be next.
No doubt production for the Indian examples will start soon. π
Range
Looking at the LCA, and thinking of the naval variant that is due to fly in 2007, what kind of range are we talking about? And internal fuel load? Which ever way you look at it, the LCA is small.
A couple of ANA 7E7 images from Boeing..