Can anyone ID the pod on the left wing of the F16i? Thanks.
An ACMI pod perhaps?
I have always wondered, what is currently the best Attack Helicopter out there, there is the Tiger, Mi-28N, Apache Longbow, latest Cobras, Ka-52, Rooivalk, A129 and others. Which do you guys thing is the best when it comes to survival and other things?
I think anything that has an added all weather/night attack capability would rank as a cut above the rest IMO. The AH-64D Longbow, the Mil-28N Night Hunter, or the Ka-52 Alligator with the Arbalet radar fitted.
Many speculate that the PAK-FA will be developed from the existing S-37 with a conventional wing
I remember that too. I have a pic I saved ages ago. (turns out to the same as Srbin’s)
Phased arrays..
What I would like to know in some detail is HOW exactly does the phasing of an array of transmitter/receiver modules shape and bend the radar beam?
I have not been able to find any real – and understandable – explanation to the that so far?
> Srbin
> Russian Anti Shipping Missiles
> The Russians seem to have quite a few Anti Shipping Missiles,
> so which one is the best and which ones are planned for RuAF
> and RuN?
I don’t know which one is best but the US Navy knew of the developement of many of the missiles but, the missile they decided to get a purchase production license for was the SS-N-22! They use it as a target missile to sharpen the skills of aegis crews. The US Navy’s version is designated as the Mk-31 Target Missile.Adrian
Actually Adrian it was the Kh-31 (AS-17 Krypton). And the target drone model is known as the MA-31.
How much would Russia charge for the heavily upraded Su-39? I know the Scorpion upgrade costs about 10mn from Georgia!
$10 million just for the upgrade??
Matra R530C for evaluation only
Is that a PL-8 in the background? [EDIT: Can’t be, the tail fins are too large. Could it be an AIM-9 on display?]
Great News!
It is a REAL shame ANA have closed down their Australian operations… 🙁
This was in The Australian newspaper on April 23rd.
7E7 Boeing’s new load star
By Geoffrey Thomas
April 23, 2004
WHILE the new Boeing 7E7 may lack the air show excitement of Boeing’s shelved Sonic Cruiser, it has the potential to reshape the airline industry.
Boeing has been refining the design and its capabilities over the past year and this month increased the range of the aircraft and also firmed up on the short-range model.
What is exciting airlines is that for the first time an aircraft that can economically carry 217 passengers 15,700km nonstop between Sydney and New York, or London and Perth, will be a possibility.
At the same time the numbers are looking positive on the short-range version, which is being optimised for ranges such as Sydney-Perth. That aircraft would carry 289 passengers in a dual-class configuration and could fly 6500km.
Boeing expects to announce the first orders for the 7E7 shortly, with All Nippon Airways, Emirates, Singapore Airlines and leasing companies Gecas and ILFC expected to launch the aircraft. Deliveries would start in 2008.
A major attraction of the 7E7 for Qantas is its unprecedented flexibility and capability to take on Emirates and Singapore Airlines on European routes.
Qantas operates only 747-400s with 400-seat capacity to Europe, and as most of the cities in Europe cannot support a daily 747 from Australia, the airline only serves London, Frankfurt and Paris.
Emirates, on the other hand, operates to 18 destinations in Europe through its hub in Dubai, giving the airline a significant advantage.
The 7E7, with its smaller load, would change all that for Qantas. Operating through the Singapore hub, destinations such as Zurich, Rome, Munich, Athens and Amsterdam would be viable.
Qantas is not expected to be a launch customer but analysts suggest that it may order the 7E7 later this year or take some from leasing companies.
Keys to the 7E7’s capability relate to the aircraft’s engine, new systems, materials and revolutionary production processes.
Earlier this month Boeing selected engine offerings from General Electric Aircraft Engines and Rolls-Royce for the 7E7. GE will supply the GE Next Generation engine, a derivative of its GE90 engine used on the 777, while Rolls-Royce will supply the Trent 1000 – the latest version of a family of engines powering numerous wide-body types.
This is a major step forward for leasing companies, which would be able to lease 7E7s to airlines and swap engines to suit the airline’s fleet requirements. But the engine makers have a demanding set of requirements to meet.
The real surprise for airline executives is the pricing of the 7E7.
Boeing has quoted a price of just $US120 million ($165 million) – the same as a 767-300ER – based on massive savings from new production techniques gleaned from experience in building new military fighters.
Boeing Commercial Airplanes president and chief executive Alan Mulally claims that the assembly of the 7E7 could be reduced to just three days. This is a far cry from the current 10 days for the 737.
Key to that improvement is the delivery by suppliers of built-up components rather than thousands of parts – a process that was introduced at Boeing over the past five years.
The aircraft will break new ground in simplicity of systems, saving several tonnes in weight.
The 7E7 will be the most “international” aircraft Boeing has ever built, something that has caused US unions heartache. For the first time the French will supply the undercarriage for a Boeing commercial aircraft. In a twist the US will supply the Airbus A380’s undercarriage.
While simplicity is the focus on the 7E7, in the cockpit it is advanced technology that is winning.
Rockwell Collins’ new MultiScan WXR-2100 weather radar, introduced by Qantas, was a major factor in winning the supply of the 7E7’s cockpit displays, communications and surveillance systems.
Introduced in November 2000 by Qantas on its 747-400ERs, the radar automatically adjusts weather detection parameters for a number of variations and uses advanced radar technologies to adjust the data returns.
It also predicts how high the tops of storms will be. According to Qantas pilots, the radar is a huge improvement in protection from encounters with turbulence.
7E7 passengers will sit in a cabin that looks more like a set from Star Trek. Boeing has also added huge windows to enhance the feeling of spaciousness.
However, the best news for passengers is the increase in humidity from the current 5 per cent to 35 per cent, made possible by a revolutionary fuselage.
This, combined with a reduction in the pressurisation altitude from 8000ft to 6000ft, will result in a dramatic reduction in jetlag.
-ends-
I wonder who the next customer will be? Any bets? 🙂
I don’t think so- according to the latest news regarding those two new build destroyers, they’ll be armed with extended range variants of the Moskit SSMs. Someone should have the exact 3M80??? designation here. Was posted a while ago.
3M82? I have seen that before.
This maintains the dual-standard policy set by the original active-radar and infrared-guided versions, which were fielded in medium (R-27R and -27T) and long-range (R-27ER and -27ET) variants respectively.
The R-27R (‘ALAMO-C’) and R-27ER (‘ALAMO-D’) versions are SARH, not active radar homing. The new R-27EP is a passive homer? So how does it home? On enemy fighter radar emissions?
Is there still an active radar version of the R-27 on the way?
On Yakhont. Are the Chinese getting it? I heard a while ago that the new 956EM Sovremenny DDGs will have their SS-N-22s replaced with the Yakhont.
With Python-4 and soon Python-5, as well as the Derby BVR AAM, the Israeli F-15s would have to be near the most lethal operational air combat assets in the world.
Any talks about exports?
According to Janes it was cleared for export two years ago, but I don’t think it’s propects are too good. It is too specialised, probably too expensive, and the Su-30MK family is doing very well, and customers seem to prefer that.
Really only India and China I could see as any hope for Su-34 sales in the near to medium term future.
(p.s. I LOVE the new look forum!)
🙂
So you are saying the VS max. for the APG-68 is probably greater than 80nm/148km? If so, I can understand why it appears to be classified.
Originally posted by Vympel
It’s the Alfa, the land attack version of Oniks/Yakhont. *Old* pciture though.
Old? yeah, I have had it stored for a while.