dark light

GDL

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,156 through 1,170 (of 1,255 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Radar questions #2695138
    GDL
    Participant

    Velocity Search mode doesn’t give you a range, just a direction and a closure rate, so how can it have a range display?

    I know it does not give you range, but in VS mode the radar range defaults to 80nm. The range indicator is replaced by the velocity indicator on the top of the screen, either 1,200kts or 2,400kts, which ever is selected.

    So if a track is picked up in VS mode, we can assume that it is within 80nm of the our own radar right?

    in reply to: ANZAC Day. #1576640
    GDL
    Participant

    Re: ANZAC Day.

    Originally posted by Andy in Beds
    To all Aussies and Kiwis on the forum.
    Wishing you all well for Sunday 25th April and I salute your war dead.
    Lest we Forget.
    Andy.

    Cheers! Currently enjoying the usuall feast of war films at this time of the year, including ‘Mosquito Squadron’ which is on right now. 🙂

    in reply to: Russian Anti Shipping Missiles #2695171
    GDL
    Participant

    Speaking of Russian missiles..

    Not sure if this is an anti-ship missile of some kind, but the big white weapon in this photo has had me bugged for ages.

    Its mounted on an Su-34 by the way.

    What could it be?

    in reply to: N-014 projected Radar for MFI #2695177
    GDL
    Participant

    Originally posted by djnik
    Wow with that range of APG-77,F-22 does not need an AWACS support!

    Not really. The presence of AWACS means the F/A-22 can sneak up on it’s prey – via datalink info – without having to use it’s own radar at all, and therefore remain unseen at least in respect to emissions. Theoretically it should be able to get close enough to fire an AMRAAM before the bogey even knows what is happening.

    GDL
    Participant

    Freelance…. cool, that is what I prefer. 😎

    in reply to: What's the purpose of the horizontal dielectric bands? #2695290
    GDL
    Participant

    Originally posted by Papa Lima
    and another from the same site, looks like some fancy paint scheme rather than dielectric!

    It looks like a paint job to me too. The dielectric panel is on the leading edge of the fin.

    in reply to: F-15S #2695370
    GDL
    Participant

    Have to admit this has woken me up!

    I totally lost track of Saudi AF developments after 1991, and most of everything for a while as I was travelling. I was in Japan when the order for the F-15S was placed (1993), and in Japan again when it first flew, and then was rolled out officially (1995). After that I don’t recall reading about the deliveries which ended just 5 years ago.

    Thanks MarocMirage for the reminder! 🙂

    in reply to: F-15S #2695385
    GDL
    Participant
    in reply to: Su-34 #2695394
    GDL
    Participant

    Or perhaps they should’ve called it BEAUTY? (Anyone who gets this reference wins a prize)

    Ok, I give up! :confused:

    in reply to: which is cheaper, Mirage 2000Mk5 or Gripen? #2695400
    GDL
    Participant

    Sorry, a passive phased array has a pretty limited range IIRC.

    From what I have read the addition of phased-array antennas to radars has usually increased their range.

    On the other hand performance can be degraded at extreme look angles relative to the pitch angle of the parent fighter, if the antenna is fixed. Perhaps this is where the notion of range limits have come from for phased arrays.

    in reply to: China receives first batch of Su-30MK2s #2695438
    GDL
    Participant

    Originally posted by Vympel
    http://www.overscan.co.uk/Avionics.html

    Courtesy of one of our most valuable members, aerospacetech.

    Thanks Vympel, don’t know why I didn’t check there first myself. 😮

    in reply to: NZ Anzac Day #1585786
    GDL
    Participant

    I will make the pilgrimage to Gallipoli oneday I am sure……… 🙂

    in reply to: Blue Vixen radar versus Zhuk-ME/M for upgrades #2695454
    GDL
    Participant

    Well then what is the Blue Vixen radar based on, if it is actually based on anything?

    in reply to: Constructionof an Su-30MK in 3 min, 20 sec #2695468
    GDL
    Participant

    Originally posted by Vympel
    That’s odd. Whether it will download or not should have nothing to do with your computer.

    Overstated the problem possibly.

    It may be a browser problem. as all I get is a screen full of jibberish code when I click to download it. 😮

    I am using Navigator v7.1.

    in reply to: China receives first batch of Su-30MK2s #2695545
    GDL
    Participant

    The PANDA is the N-001 with a phased array antenna yes? First I have heard of it. Would like to know more.

    Same the Zhuk-MSE, what are the details?

Viewing 15 posts - 1,156 through 1,170 (of 1,255 total)