Thanks for that info Vympel. I was looking at the pic posted that resembles the ATACMS rocket. 🙂
Tender weighs between 3,800-4,200kg
Any more specs on the TENDER SRBM? Is TENDER a Russian name?
On Russian radars, when exactly did NII Priborostroeniya (NIIP) become officially known as the V Tikhomirov Scientific Research Institute?
Considering where the Israeli air liners fly and what they are, might be handy for them, but I still think it is a waste of money for American or European airlines, if they go ahead with this. Australia has dropped the idea.
Unrelated…
But the Milavia site is looking really good Niels!
The Russian equivalent to the American ATACMS?
Originally posted by aerospacetech
http://www.royfc.com/cgi-bin/today/acft_news.cgiThats where Vympel gets his news- in English.
Cheers Paul. Been there before. Will have to frequent it a bit more often I think. 🙂
Originally posted by Dave Homewood
And why does that airline have it? Isit still flying a scheduled route? Or perhaps charters?
One of Dornier’s family is the current Chief Exec of the airline. Not sure how they will, or do use it, but I suspect either local coastal runs, or charters in and around the Phillipines.
I think the new engines are indeed P&W 1,125hp PT-6As. The original engines were the 1,000hp Wright R-1820-G102 for the Dutch service models, and the 1,000hp BMW-Bramo 323-R2 Fafnir for the German built service models.
What is the difference with the Kashtan-M over the original Kashtan?
Originally posted by glitter
The F-16 is very easy for mainteance, specially for an american plane.
On the other hand, I’m not sure for the block 60.
The JSF/F-35 is supposed to be even easier.
Originally posted by Harry
Hey, welcome back, Glenn!Back for good or just temporary? 😡
Even 16x Barak vertical launch cells require very little space. The Barak is being standardised on all IN warships and must hence be expected on the Gorshkov too.
Hi Harry! How are you? Back for a while hopefully. I agree on BARAK, the article mentions that the final design may still end up different to match Indian needs. We may still see them install BARAK somehow, somewhere. 😉
Originally posted by Srbin
I really want to know what kind of big advantages does the F-35 really hold over F-16blk60 besides stealth?
Range for starters if the figures released so far are to be believed. The F-35 is also designed to be very maintenance friendly, which will contribute greatly toward lower life cycle costs.
Unfortunately terrorists may not be the only people the USAF finds itself up against in future. All bases have to be covered.
Mate the latest official stuff that I’ve been readin is that the RAAF are now only going to buy 57 F-35’s as these planes are not delivering on promised goals, thus the government have started cutting back on the order (Read that in Asia Pacific Aerospace).
Its a bit early to be judging on promised goals yet, the SD&D phase for the F-35 has only just begun. Until a release is made by the MOD, nothing I see regarding our numbers is official as far as I am concerned.
The growing idea is for the RAAF to look into buying FB-22’s should they become a reality, if this doesn’t happen then the contest will be opened up to procure a deep ranged strike a/c.
FB-22 would be nice, but cost again would have to be an issue, unless of course the USAF produced a lot of them. The problem with a new comp for a long-range striker after 2010 is that pretty much all on offer will be ‘old’ by then; been simply upgraded versions of old airframes, e.g. Rafale, Typhoon, etc. On the other hand, UCAVs will be maturing, or mature systems after 2010, they will be very stealthy compared to contemporary manned platforms, and will have VERY good PGM payload/range figures too. And they will be cheaper, and will not endanger valuable pilots. I still think with the RAAF’s tendency to ‘look ahead’ for future tactical air systems, the UCAV concept stands a good chance.
F-35 a cold war relic? Don’t agree. The concept was born right when the Cold War was ending, and so all development work has occured after it.
If anything, its the first of the ‘new world’ fighters. Everything else was born in the 70’s or 80’s.
Hey Glenn, hope you can stay a while…
Hope so. It was a lot of trans-Atlantic bickering and other fighting, and not enough good discussion, that drove me off here a year ago during the height of the Iraq war. Hope things will be better this time.
Cheers. 🙂
(p.s. GarryB, didn’t you call me your nemesis at one stage, possibly jokingly?)