dark light

planeman6000

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 270 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: News on India's forth coming Carriers??? #2034043
    planeman6000
    Participant

    Always confuses me when posters on whatever forums try to discourage people from posting. Fresh threads is what keeps forums moving.

    Anyway, raise an eyebrow at the 4th country in the exclusive club propaganda. Very interesting carrier design tho so cannot wait to see it enter service.

    in reply to: PLAAF News, Photos and Speculation #12 #2494145
    planeman6000
    Participant

    The other Chinese photo of my controversy lately
    http://img268.imageshack.us/img268/5888/18896181242353240.jpg

    in reply to: The myth of missile boat threat? #2034335
    planeman6000
    Participant

    How does the general trend to stealthiness change the picture. Ie. the latest Chinese, Norwegian, Taiwanese and Finnish boats?

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/aa/Skjold_class_17_jan_08.jpg

    in reply to: Sri Lanka Aircraft #2499233
    planeman6000
    Participant

    F-5E Tiger IIs for fighters, Eurocopter Tigre for attack.

    in reply to: The myth of missile boat threat? #2034576
    planeman6000
    Participant

    FACs are not capable of carrying a battle management system and incapable of self defense, .

    Why not? Can you please explain your logics here
    :confused:

    in reply to: Greatest RAF leap forward? #2501222
    planeman6000
    Participant

    Predator over the Phoenix UAV

    Tornado GR1 was not a huge leap over the Jaguar IMO and Buccaneer?

    in reply to: UGLIEST PLANES?!?! #2503522
    planeman6000
    Participant

    http://www.msacomputer.com/FlyingBoats-old/saro/1947Saunders-Roe-SRA1-Fighter.jpg

    in reply to: UGLIEST PLANES?!?! #2503665
    planeman6000
    Participant

    I find it hard to think of any plane as ugly, but boring yes, definately some boring ones out there. In my view boring us a worse offsense!

    But for ugly, I sorta think of these as ugly.

    King of ugly
    http://img386.imageshack.us/img386/6139/yak3611ha3.jpg

    The ugly duckling
    http://imgcash6.imageshack.us/img110/3702/yakovlevyak38ujq5.jpg

    Now there are some gorgeous Yaks out there, but this one is uglier than the animal
    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/2c/Yak25R_1.jpg/300px-Yak25R_1.jpg
    http://www.geo.arizona.edu/dgesl/Assets/research_pictures/regional/asian_monsoon_dynamics/yak.gif

    fat belly
    http://www.neam.co.uk/images/f84_to.jpg

    Fat wings
    http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2338/2236842167_7f4bf2621c.jpg

    Now I love this plane, but looks weren’t its strong point
    http://www.airwar.ru/photo/il102/il102-1.jpg

    in reply to: PLAAF News, Photos and Speculation #12 #2504175
    planeman6000
    Participant

    Yeah I recognise it. Can’t recall the program but sure it’s US not Chinese. 1990s I think.

    in reply to: Barak-8 – full-size mockup revealed #1816938
    planeman6000
    Participant

    Is this the system India has been working with Israel on? Maybe one day India will get ‘true’ air-defence escorts for her carriers.

    in reply to: Aster? #1816987
    planeman6000
    Participant

    Re the in-service units. Any info on where they are garrisoned, which units etc? Or pics in operational service?

    in reply to: BAE Mantis in final assembly – to fly soon (pics!!!!) #2452705
    planeman6000
    Participant

    Undercarriage doesn’t look like a fixed type, just that undercarriage doors are not shown/closed

    in reply to: HAL upgraded Vietnamese MiG-21s? #2476596
    planeman6000
    Participant

    Vietnam anyone?

    in reply to: HAL upgraded Vietnamese MiG-21s? #2479138
    planeman6000
    Participant

    Just a thought, but if Vietnam upgraded it’s MiG-21s to Bison standard, would they have R-77s? I thought Vietnam didn’t have them even for the Flankers? – If they did then Malaysia Would have R-77s and Singapore would bring its stockpile of AMRAAMs home?

    Any info on whether Vietnamese Flankers have R-77?

    in reply to: HAL upgraded Vietnamese MiG-21s? #2481712
    planeman6000
    Participant

    Found a reference to AFM in 2000… says HAL was favoured then for political reasons:

    “THE VIETNAM People’s Army Air Force is looking to upgrade its MiG-21 fleet of approximately 220 aircraft. There are four companies vying for the work – Thomson CSF Hindustan Aircraft Ltd, an Israeli company (Elbit Systems or Israel Aircraft Industries) and a Russian company (Sokol-Nizhniy Novgorod Aircraft Building Plant). According to AFM’s informed source, HAL is favorite for political reasons.

    Meanwhile, Elbit Systems has asked Laos if it wants to consider upgrading its 20 MiG-21S – but it is unlikely that anything will materialize from this.”

    (source: AFM, April 2000)

    http://74.125.113.132/search?q=cache:http://www.aeronautics.ru/nws002/afm136.htm

    So the question is whether HAL got the deal, how many and what does the upgrade consist of?

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 270 total)