dark light

El_Indigo

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 271 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russian Navy Thread #2010965
    El_Indigo
    Participant

    WW2 carriers were also armoured. Todays carriers are nowhere near to that level. But they are bigger on the other hand soo i can see why they said they’d need multiple hits to succefully sink or gut todays carriers

    Could they however repair a todays carrier from a single say Onix hit without going back to port ? Depends where it hits I suppose ?

    Keep in mind he is specifically talking about export numbers, since they are most relevant currently.

    I thought soo. But Malakhit, Granit along with Bazalt and vulkan were never exported.

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread #2010991
    El_Indigo
    Participant

    Wanshan your range numbers are off or at least some of them.

    I guess they thought combined active/passive radar seeker would do the trick.

    Cost comes into play also.

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 10 #2301104
    El_Indigo
    Participant

    They didn’t buy. US did however obtain a S-300 and learned from it.

    Again Sean has whole write up about it.

    Saying however that Arrow would not have happend if not for the S-300 that’s frankly pushing it.

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 10 #2301352
    El_Indigo
    Participant

    Hmm, money and perhaps in electronics and optics ? Although for that there is South Korea.

    Edit

    Is there a good book about Beriev design bureau especially about some of their proposed concepts ? A website will be fine also.

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 10 #2301363
    El_Indigo
    Participant

    Add to that I doubt Russia would offer any joint ventures with India in regard their long range sam’s.

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 10 #2301416
    El_Indigo
    Participant

    Look up Sean O Conner He has a good wright up why the S-300 especially later versions. Are superior systems.

    but that sales record suggests that Patriot may be a better choice.

    Most countries that purchased Patriot don’t included Russian kit as an option really on account of being NATO members or like Saudi’s which allthough buy Euro and have bought Russian gear usually stick to American kit due to “dollar recycling.” There are exceptions, such as Greece. And perhaps Turkey will be also.

    But that’s rare.

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 10 #2301428
    El_Indigo
    Participant

    The word was that the Buk would be easily jammable by the Russians (precived to be largest threat to the fins) considering they build the system.

    From what I read from my days on mp.net. The fins there said that the source for that was only from a journalist and not official military source. And the Buk’s themselfs will be kept till the end of their 20 year lifespan. So 3 more years to go.

    JSR will you please for the love of god stop posting.

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 10 #2302132
    El_Indigo
    Participant

    I think i’m speaking for everyone when I say. That both of you twats need to take it to the PM’s.

    in reply to: INS Vikramaditya: Steaming towards Induction #2011124
    El_Indigo
    Participant

    Sure. The Borovichi Refractories Plant/Borovichi Firebricks Works.

    My bad then. I thought that company went under in 1995.

    in reply to: INS Vikramaditya: Steaming towards Induction #2011191
    El_Indigo
    Participant

    How about Russian vendor just used a “COTS” fire brick, rather than the proper mil-spec ones specified for naval propulsion system as the MOD of China clarified? A”COTS” product meets the damage control of a commercial application, but it’s the general contractor’s liability to make sure its selected “COTS” product meets the OEM mil-spec set by the general contractor

    That’s a possibility.

    (yes, there are still manufacturers there) whom Sevmash could have turned to.

    Can you name one ?

    in reply to: INS Vikramaditya: Steaming towards Induction #2011236
    El_Indigo
    Participant

    I think it shall be the Russian doing the damage control by maligning the Chinese side. Minister of defence of china come out and clarify. So what you think?

    You know what I think. Look above. What damage controle by Russia though ? They indeed don’t have the capability to produce fire bricks anymore.

    So either they are lying from whome they’ve imported (Why would they?) or like I said Chinese are doing damage controle.

    in reply to: INS Vikramaditya: Steaming towards Induction #2011245
    El_Indigo
    Participant

    Then were pray tell did they acquire firebricks from then ?

    Sounds like damage controle from China mostly aimed for their own populas.

    in reply to: AH-64 Vs Air-Defence #2302943
    El_Indigo
    Participant

    Whatever happend to that N025 radar, TR ?

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread #2011290
    El_Indigo
    Participant

    Yes, it has been said that there are issues А190-01 arty complex. Whatever that has anything to do why boika hasn’t got its artillery piece yet or not. I wouldn’t know.

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 10 #2303993
    El_Indigo
    Participant

    Swedish automotive industry never technically fell behind. It’s lack of appeal what did them in. That and being bought by Americans.

    AESA is not hardware alone but software.

    Seeing as how many programs been plagued by software glitches and there has been overal complains of inadequacy in this field.

    They have a long way to go. Which is puzzeling seeing as Russia doesn’t lack in software specialists.

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 271 total)