dark light

El_Indigo

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 271 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2174749
    El_Indigo
    Participant

    It’s spudman for **** sakes.

    Anyway TR

    http://fair.org/home/no-isis-where-russia-is-bombing-except-last-week-when-isis-was-killing-gay-men-there/

    Looks like you nailed it in regards to western media.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2178811
    El_Indigo
    Participant

    Better than any helicopter save the Mi-28. I doubt its survivability is significantly lower than the Mi-28’s in combat as well, plus it has ejection seats. Certainly no worse than the deployed Mi-24s protection.

    And it has the huge advantage of a full defensive suit (unlike Mi-28N to date or Su-25SM, not to even mention Mi-24/35) in addition to the DIRCM.
    Being able to know you are under MANPAD fire + have a means to disable them >>>> a slight armor advantage.

    Mi-28 has more then a slight armor advantage over 52. Like I said DIRCM is nice and all. But bigger threat in that mess will be good all fashion AA and your regular small arms wielding beardie.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2178901
    El_Indigo
    Participant

    Curious as to why Ka-52 is not being deployed.

    DIRCM is nice and all. But it has paper thin armour.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXV #2180799
    El_Indigo
    Participant

    And since the little troll likes hammers and hands so much:

    snip pic

    you know the guy is a Frenchmen.

    in reply to: Is the J-20 the least maneuverable 5th gen? #2182238
    El_Indigo
    Participant

    Supercruising at high quote with not any external load was something a quite some planes was able to achieve even in the sixties, just a combination about thrust/weight ratio and clean lines, nothing more, nothing less.
    Before stealth it was however something of those impressive but in the end not operatively useful feats.

    F-22 is extremely gifted in this field but there is not any secret upa dupa technology behind this, just powerful engines and inner weapon bays.

    Note this is about flight with payload, i.e. 4xR-4 missiles. And yes there were already planes that could super-cruise in that decade like English Electric Lightning, etc.

    in reply to: Is the J-20 the least maneuverable 5th gen? #2182611
    El_Indigo
    Participant

    The Russians have just figured out super cruise, and.now you will leap frog them?

    Actually first Russian plane to super-cruise was the Tu-128 interceptor.

    http://rusarmy.com/forum/threads/voprosy-voennomu-ljotchiku-1-klassa-olegu-vydrenku.7548/page-6#post-284865

    in reply to: Kresta II, Kara ,Udaloy classes anti-ship capabilities #2020299
    El_Indigo
    Participant

    ^ Awesome pic

    How will a SSN-14 Rastrub armed ship fare against a Harpoon armed ship though?
    As the Harpoon armed ship has the advantage of a longer range, what can the Rastrub armed ship do to survive.

    The first Harpoon RGM-84A had the same range as Rastrub. Granted Rastrub had to have mid-course correction to be practical at it’s max range.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXV #2186734
    El_Indigo
    Participant

    I second that. Been looking for an hour now.

    Berkut, did you ever manage to pump out more info on 101KS-P from that UOMZ employee ?

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread 2. #2020531
    El_Indigo
    Participant

    Most likely this is S Band Radar what they are mentioning

    http://concern-agat.ru/en/production/radiolocation-radio-electronic-systems-and-complexes/radar-with-fixed-s-band-active-phased-array

    No, this is Salyut’s product. Poliment is from Almaz.

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread 2. #2020556
    El_Indigo
    Participant

    I’m suprised…. that Jonesy old boy hasn’t pointed this out yet.

    Found some new Multiband Radar and L Band Radar under works and it seems to be for Gorshkov-M class frigate

    http://concern-agat.ru/en/production/radiolocation-radio-electronic-systems-and-complexes/radar-with-rotating-l-band-active-phased-array

    Come on man look at the mass and power consumption FOR THE L BAND RADAR. That’s not going to go on Project 22350M that would be idiotic.

    Not to mention along with the multi-functional integrated radar mast with whatever flavored phased array(S}

    Now Project 22350M seems to be a real proposal. But the video and that placard from concern agat is just advertisement using Gorshkov hull for the new radars.

    For the Project 22350M when and if it comes. The radar you might best expect is the 5P-27 being replaced by 5P-27M which may or may not be an AESA. But so far the 5P-27M looks to be vaporware.

    http://www.npo-prz.ru/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=167:-5-27-5-27&catid=26:2012-06-25-08-40-22&Itemid=70

    The manufacturers website still uses Furke-2 as placeholder for it.

    I believe you but not that man in the video

    Fall’s inline with the hi-lo and hi-hi range and most important it said so by a NPO Mash personnel. There isn’t anything to debate here.

    Edit

    Is that the AESA Array of X band type ? It is quite big indeed

    Thats what i’m thinking also.

    in reply to: Su-35 versus F-35 in command sim #2190757
    El_Indigo
    Participant

    No problem, let’s expand the list with slotted array types.. Not that many left, anyway..

    Russia PESA: SBI16 Zaslon (series), Zaslon-M (series), N011M BARS (series), N035 Irbis (series), V004 (series), Zhuk-MF (not used), Zhuk-MSF (not used), BARS-29 (not used), Pero (not used), Kopyo/Pharaon (not used), OSA-2 (series?)

    You’re forgetting the original Zhuk PESA the RP-35 and it’s bigger brother for the Sukhoi. Which were originally going to be Zhuk-MF and Zhuk-MSF until they got terminated and the label was used for the N031 Sokol PESA radars. The N031 also had an AESA derivative the Zhuk-MA which was the second Phazotron AESA.

    in reply to: Airwar in the 80s WP vs NATO #2196301
    El_Indigo
    Participant

    From Wikipedia:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lend-Lease

    ‘In total, the US deliveries through Lend-Lease amounted to $11 billion in materials: over 400,000 jeeps and trucks; 12,000 armored vehicles (including 7,000 tanks, about 1,386[26] of which were M3 Lees and 4,102 M4 Shermans);[27] 11,400 aircraft (4,719 of which were Bell P-39 Airacobras)[28] and 1.75 million tons of food.[29]

    Roughly 17.5 million tons of military equipment, vehicles, industrial supplies, and food were shipped from the Western Hemisphere to the USSR, 94% coming from the US. For comparison, a total of 22 million tons landed in Europe to supply American forces from January 1942 to May 1945. It has been estimated that American deliveries to the USSR through the Persian Corridor alone were sufficient, by US Army standards, to maintain sixty combat divisions in the line.[30][31]

    The United States gave to the Soviet Union from October 1, 1941 to May 31, 1945 the following: 427,284 trucks, 13,303 combat vehicles, 35,170 motorcycles, 2,328 ordnance service vehicles, 2,670,371 tons of petroleum products (gasoline and oil), 4,478,116 tons of foodstuffs (canned meats, sugar, flour, salt, etc.), 1,900 steam locomotives, 66 Diesel locomotives, 9,920 flat cars, 1,000 dump cars, 120 tank cars, and 35 heavy machinery cars. One item typical of many was a tire plant that was lifted bodily from the Ford Company’s River Rouge Plant and transferred to the USSR. The 1947 money value of the supplies and services amounted to about eleven billion dollars’

    The amount of trucks it shipped didn’t always indicate in numbers of arrived.

    Also regarding the trucks

    http://www.1jma.dk/articles/1jmaarticlelendlease.htm

    Only 19% of the trucks in the truck part were imported.

    agree, in the long run, economy win every time

    History has shown that not be always true.

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread 2. #2021297
    El_Indigo
    Participant

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]
    snip.

    It’s a Photoshop from airbase.ru forums.

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread 2. #2021416
    El_Indigo
    Participant

    Ok fine , Since I dont understand russian and translator in u tube is not that accurate so thought.

    Ask TR1 if you don’t believe me.

    Me , Getting 340 Km Lo-Lo range is a tall ask.

    Vulcan and Granit say hi.

    Even with 500 km Range I would say Onyx lo-lo range is ~ 150 km , which I think is not bad at all

    Why ? If Onyx does 500 km in hi-lo that’s 210 km more then Yakhont/BrahMos in hi-lo profile it should at least have higher range then 150 km in lo-lo profile compared to Yakhont/BrahMos in lo-lo profile which is 120 km.

    the new Supersonic Missile they are talking about is aimed at Lo-Lo range of 200 km.

    So what ? We don’t know much about this new missile. if it has such range in lo-lo doesn’t mean Onyx or any other missile should have either. It really depend on size, speed and propulsion of said missile.

    I’m more interested in who is behind this new missile. Raduga ? NPO Mash ? NPO Novator ? КТРВ ? Raduga was supposed to be working on few projects among them a hyper-sonic one and a supersonic one. Kh-32 and Kh-MT I took/take it. NPO Mash ? is busy with Hyper-sonic Zircon. And I take assisting with BrahMos mini. That leaves NPO Novator and КТРВ itself.

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread 2. #2021428
    El_Indigo
    Participant

    Do they say that In russian , perhaps I dont know.

    The man from NPO Mash says that yes. The high-low profile Onyx is supposed to have a range of 500 km according to a guy who leaked various Kalibr specification first which latter where confirmed to be accurate. Range for Onyx was btw also reported as 500 km before http://ria.ru/defense_safety/20140319/1000160934.html and not the first time. And also as 600 km.(hi-hi profile no doubt)

    But its not possible for a supersonic missile to fly low level ( 10-15 m ) and get those range of 340 km , I would say the best case range would be between 120-150 km

    Says who ?

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 271 total)