dark light

El_Indigo

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 271 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russian Navy Thread 2. #2021469
    El_Indigo
    Participant

    I used the translator and it says at medium altitude its range is 300 km

    I know. But they are repeating numbers for export version Yakhont on to Onyx. The vid I linked is from the horses mouth stating range of Onyx at low alt no less then 340 km.

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread 2. #2021485
    El_Indigo
    Participant

    The new missile low low range is 200 km , a quick back of paper calculation would tell me the hi-lo range is 500 km which is 200 more then current Onyx

    Onyx’s range is no less the 340 km at low altitude at 0:45 mark.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=clWZCNaZpeE

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread 2. #2022347
    El_Indigo
    Participant

    http://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/1981067

    Bal coastal missile complex will get a modernized 300km ranged Kh-35.

    About 300 kilometers. The Ship and shore versions all have range of 260 km. Only the air launched version has more 290 km for the newest version. Those AFAIK have not been tested.

    El_Indigo
    Participant

    From what i remember that was the case with MiG-19. Partially why it was so unpopular with Vietnamese pilots. AA guns also and Ak-47’s.

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread 2. #2023894
    El_Indigo
    Participant

    It is. I wish they modernized the place.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 14 #2216168
    El_Indigo
    Participant

    Apart from berry interesting details on this data placard @ AeroIndia last month, looks like the design of the FGA-35 AESA itself has evolved significantly (see top right):

    http://www.militaryparitet.com/editor/assets/new/files2/fga35%203.jpg

    The stand mock up radar however does not look like whats quite in the picture.

    http://se.uploads.ru/OoWb9.jpg

    Back when it was called FGA-35 (3D)didn’t NIIR spoken about it having a detection and tracking range of 200 km ? They really should take cue from NIIP in this regard.

    in reply to: Which is tougher A10 or Su-25 (genuine question)? #2218033
    El_Indigo
    Participant

    Su-25 also had redundant systems, and apparently much heavier armor than A-10. To quote myself (I’ve translated from a source I currently can’t find it on my pc.)

    755 kg was a total amount devoted for protection and only 2/3 of that weight was for the titanium armor if I recall correctly.

    A-10C has a clear electronic advantage over the cheaper Su-25SM upgrade. The latter does not even have MAWS.
    Both vanilla birds are horribly outdated in any case.

    Su-25SM3 really should be the bare minimum for any new CAS purchases/modernizations. Flying either the A-10 and Su-25 without DIRCM today is just stupid.

    You know what would also be nice ? For MoD stop ******* around and provide the funding for Tula to finish Hermes ******* A’s

    in reply to: World Missiles News #1788211
    El_Indigo
    Participant

    AI Capable US Anti-Ship Missile Spooks Russia, Lavrov Vows To Retaliate

    What a title!! Nowhere does he talk about this AI Capable US Anti-Ship Missile in their own quotes.

    On Dec. 9, Russian Foereign Minister Sergei Lavrov expressed concern about the increased presence of U.S. anti-missile system in Europe. With this, Lavrov said Russia would have to retaliate with adequate measures.

    “We warn that at some stage of the development of the American missile defence systems, we will have to take adequate measures to ensure our own security,” Lavrov said according to a report from Reuters.

    He’s referring to ABM systems.

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread 2. #2026161
    El_Indigo
    Participant

    Unless they start building Leader in next few years It won’t be joining ranks at least not till late 2020’s.

    I don’t think this paint-job cost that much, kept already existing personnel busy, that’s about it.

    You might have a point there.

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread 2. #2026194
    El_Indigo
    Participant

    At least Lazarev looks somewhat dignified now.

    Too spruce Laz up to this extent means that Laz will be cannibalized and used as a museum piece. Or that Laz might go into service perhaps as a test-bed for new nuclear propulsion, etc.

    Because I refuse to believe they would spruce Lazarev to this extent and just going to scrap it. That’ s a waste of money.

    in reply to: Russian Space and Missiles thread #5 #1788266
    El_Indigo
    Participant

    No, Pantsir-SM will have a new 40 km range hypersonic missile which hasn’t been shown yet. The 23YA6 missile which is the upgrade missile for current domestic pantsir’s replacing the 95YA6 series* has a range of 30 km(35 km). Which was already tested back in April

    see

    http://vpk-news.ru/news/20071

    and

    http://en.itar-tass.com/russia/729304

    * Which themselves went through revisions

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread 2. #2026474
    El_Indigo
    Participant

    Easy on the eyes.

    http://www.wrk.ru/forums/attachment.php?item=417905&download=1

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread 2. #2026523
    El_Indigo
    Participant

    Did Medvedka achieve operational status in the end?. Thought for a while there was a niche for a lightweight system able to throw an asw torpedo out beyond the effective range of the over-the-side shots.

    Especially given the emergence of lightweight tails that have given very modest hulls a convergence zone capability. Hulls that, where they feature an aviation capability, may not have huge fuel, sparing and crew facilities for sub hunting choppers.

    Make the medvedka system adaptable for a range of LWTs and I thought they really had an export winner on their hands there.

    It did and was offered for export. But it’s hard to sell something for export if you yourself ain’t using it I would think. Well the project 22350 is supposed to have Medvedka’s according to some, but folks on Balancer in the know says thats not true.

    With India looking to replace Abhay-class corvette’s. I would think they would try to market Medvedka’s to them. Maybe offer a ASuW variant based on Project 21630 hull with Medvedka’s and RBU-6000 or something of sorts.

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread 2. #2026611
    El_Indigo
    Participant

    Impressively clean superstructure. But how come none of the frigates pictured field any anti-sub rockets? The preceding Krivak class units were equipped with RBU-6000s IIRC. Any particular reason they’ve been omitted?

    They do! The 91RТ-02/91R-2 Otvet’s/ formally Vodopad-2’s. That and what TR1 said.

    A VLS launched succesor for Udav and RPK-2 based on Medvedka rockets was proposed.

    6 22350s is just what is contracted, I think intention was/is always to make more.

    Naval insiders already where saying back in 2011 that project 22350 would go through an evolution like that of 20380. And 6 22350 is all that might be built before this rumored further evolved 22350 shows up.

    And seeing this video on concern agat’s youtube page. Which looks like a ship around the size of and based on 22350. I’m a believer that will be the case.

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread 2. #2027047
    El_Indigo
    Participant

    Re. Modernization, everything I had seen from reliable sources (indirect like Balancers, Kulashev’s blog, etc, to Zvedochkas blogspot) indicated this did not include any modernization. Well, nothing past the small typical stuff (navigation radars, new screens).

    I remember Zvezdochka shipyard was qouted by media saying that modernization of ship missile systems would happen as last task in 2015

    see for one.

    http://www.flot.com/news/navy/index.php?ELEMENT_ID=147276

    Cannot find a direct qoute right now. What those systems were was a speculation however it seems by media. My mistake on my part sorry.

    I did not expect any SAM upgrade at all, even Fort-M would be great. Redut I think is out of the question, it would require a totally new sensor suit (not just Podberezovik). Plus, no hints from any other enterprises that would be involved if Redut was indeed ordered for this ship.

    Well if they keep the Top Dome we will know the answer. And best we can hope that Fort will be replaced with Fort-M. But I have some slight hope now. And I can see them using slava’s as a test bed for krepost part (big cells for 40N6,48N6DM and quad packed 9M96M/DM/M2) of the Redut-K (Krepost) system.

    I am also skeptical at anything like Gorshkov’s lavish Furke-4, I expect a modern two face Fregat at best.
    Then again who knows, this came without any warning. Makes the long out of service time slightly more tolerable, and hopefully also means good things for the other ships of the class.

    My reasoning here is Fregat’s are lacking with quite a gap in terms of range compared to Podberezovik. 5P-27 is supposed to have a same range as poliment which has supposed range of 400 km. I would think this 5P-27M at least slightly longer range and thus would be a lot more of ideal choice then any fregat.

    On the other hand domestic fregat’s could have longer range then what is offered for export. A good example of it are Pozitiv-M radars.

    First offering

    http://forum.keypublishing.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=193268

    Later offering (same as domestic spec at least interms of range)

    http://www.concern-agat.ru/ru/produktsiya/radiolokatsiya/aktivnye-radiolokatsionnye-stantsii-pozitiv-me1-me1-2

    However I doubt that’s the case with Fregat’s.

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 271 total)