dark light

codrix

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Brahmos #2056768
    codrix
    Participant

    Very well put mate! My take is that if the supersonic AShM was the best thing after sliced bread than the Americans would ahve had this type of weapon in their inventory a long, long time!

    Well, infact USA is now working with it’s allies to make supersonic cruise missiles.

    USA, UK to plans to make supersonic cruise missile

    By Andrew Koch, JDW Bureau Chief, Washington DC and Nick Cook, JDW Aerospace Consultant, London

    The USA, joined it hopes shortly by the UK, plans to begin a research and development programme to look at a new land-attack supersonic cruise missile that could help strike time-critical targets and ones buried underground. The programme, an advanced concept technology demonstration being sponsored by the US Defense Threat Reduction Agency and the US Navy, will explore development of a cruise missile capable of carrying a 200 lb (90.7kg) payload at least 400nm and preferably 600nm. The missile would have a speed of M3.5 with a goal of M4.5 and a circular error of probability accuracy of 3m.

    http://www.janes.com/aerospace/military/news/jdw/jdw020507_1_n.shtml

    in reply to: Indian Defence News thread #2668703
    codrix
    Participant

    India working on homegrown Advanced Jet Trainer

    Friday, 20 August , 2004, 15:33

    Bangalore: Chief of Air Staff, Air Chief Marshal S Krishnaswamy, on Friday confirmed that India has begun designing a homegrown Advanced Jet Trainer (AJT) and said the country should stop imports at 66 British Hawk AJTs. “It should (import of Hawks) stop at 66 aircraft. After that, an indigenous AJT should fly,” Krishnaswamy said in his inaugural address at a national seminar on Military Airworthiness and Certification in Bangalore.

    “We have discussed with Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd (HAL) and they are doing final design studies. Work is going on,” he later told reporters, adding that the twin engined AJT would be an upper progression of the Intermediate Jet Trainer (IJT), which India has already built for stage II training of pilots. The IAF and HAL, he said, would approach the government once the design was finalised for the indigenous AJT, to fly at transonic speed (Mach 1, which is the speed of sound).

    The AJT will have the same cockpit as that of the IJT and larger wings. “Let us keep a time limit, in 15 years an AJT should roll out of the production line”, he said. India early this year signed a deal with BAe Systems to acquire 66 Hawk AJT for stage III training of pilots. The first Hawk is expected to be inducted in IAF by 2006.

    http://sify.com/news/othernews/fullstory.php?id=13548779

    in reply to: Indian Defence News thread #2673520
    codrix
    Participant

    Defence budget hiked by 23%

    Increasing the defence outlay in the Union Budget 2004-05, Finance Minister P Chidambaram said it had become “necessary” to make a higher allocation this year to keep up the trend of acquisition of state-of-the-art weapons.

    With the doubling of capital outlay, it appears the government would go ahead with pending proposals to acquire French Scorpene submarines, 125 multi-purpose fighters for the Air Force to replace ageing Mig-21s and with about Rs 4,000 crore (Rs 40 billion) project to increase the firepower of the infantry.

    http://in.rediff.com/money/2004/jul/08bud36.htm

    in reply to: Pakistan is a Key US Ally #2659646
    codrix
    Participant

    Colin Powell, Remarks En Route to Kuwait:

    QUESTION: Can you talk a little bit about the significance of the designation of Pakistan as a Major Non-NATO Ally? How that came about? And why it did?

    SECRETARY POWELL: There are a number of countries that we give that status to and it gives them greater access to excess defense…EDA…excess defense [articles] and property that we might have. In some instances it is more symbolic than practical. I don’t know if Pakistan, whether they’ll be able to take great advantage of it. But it is just a sign of the strength of the relationship and there are a limited number of countries in the world who enjoy major non-NATO access, as it is called: MNNA.

    We’ve been working on it for some time. It was approved within the Administration and we’ll have to make a notification to Congress, so this seemed like a good time to make note of it publicly.

    http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/30562.htm

    in reply to: Chile's Phalcon : The IAI Condor #2670577
    codrix
    Participant

    I think that the Phalcon AWACS based on IL-76 airframe will look different from those huge nosed Phalcons using Boeing 707s.

    Here is a photo of an IL-76 based Phalcon and it does not have any huge nose ….

    http://in.yimg.com/xp/reuters_ids_new/20030822/4026720291.jpg

    An Ilyushin-76 plane modified with the Israeli Phalcon strategic airborne radar system seen at Tel Aviv’s Ben Gurion Airport.

    http://in.news.yahoo.com/030822/137/2768y.html

    in reply to: News INAF. #2675765
    codrix
    Participant

    India, Russia negotiate partnership for a new missile

    New Delhi, March 2

    After their recent success in developing a supersonic cruise missile, Brahmos, India and Russia are negotiating a partnership for developing an ultra long range beyond-visual-range air to air missile . The missile is at present being developed by the Russian guided weapons builder Novator and highly placed sources here indicated that India was involved in the project by way of investment and technical participation.

    The missile, designated so far as R-172, is being developed by the Russians to be integrated with the fifth generation aircraft, with New Delhi likely to be a customer for its export version. The new missle, the sources said, was aimed at engaging high asset airborne targets such as AWACS aircraft, air to ground surveillance and mid air refullers, which normally operate from stand off distance during battles.

    The proposed acquisition assumes significance in the wake of recent media reports that Pakistan was in the process of purchasing such a missile from western countries to counter India’s moves to acquire Israeli AWACS and the recent induction of Uzbek IL-78 mid-air refuellers by the Indian Air Force. The Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) is also currently developing a beyond-visual-range air to air Missile Astra. The DRDO Chief Dr V K Atre recently told PTI that the missile was still in technology demonstrator stage and no tests had been undertaken of the new missile. MORE PTI AKD VSC JW

    03021430 D

    Meanwhile, after undergoing six highly-successfull flight tests since mid 2001, the naval version of the 290 kms range Brahmos missile has been approved for installation on all surface warships of the Navy. Defence Minister George Fernandes recently said that the Brahmos naval version had achieved all mission objectives and had been cleared for placement as a major weapon system on all surface warships. Facilities for production of Brahmos have already been set up at Bharat Dynamics in Hyderabad and the first of the naval ships would be armed with the missiles within the next three months by joint teams of Russian and Indian experts, officials said.

    The air-breathing Brahmos anti-ship missile is powered by a liquid Ramjet engine, has a maximum speed of Mach 2.8 and can carry a warhead of upto 300 kgs to a distance of 300 kms. The DRDO, along with full-fledged trials of the Naval version of the missile, have quietly also undertaken some trials for the land based version of the missile, which is to be mounted on specially modified Tetra Chasis. DRDO sources said that the land version of the missile could be ready for induction into the army by another 15 months after undertaking user trials. The air force is also gearing for the missile with modifications, which is planned to be integrated with the SU-30mki. However, scientists said that this programme could take upto 30 months.

    http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_595093,0008.htm

    in reply to: Cope India – 2004 #2680307
    codrix
    Participant

    Iaf Pilots Claim 4:1 Kill Ratio Against Usaf!

    United States Air Force (USAF) pilot Captain David Skalicky and his colleagues from the Alaska-based Pacific Command met their match among their Indian counterparts during the six-day Cope 2004 Indo-US Air Force exercise. The exercise, which began on February 19, was the first between the two air forces involving fighter combat.

    The score in the “match-up” is yet to be quantified, but the Indian pilots were upbeat. Several had a common refrain: “We gave them a few surprises in air combat. They have begun to respect us, though we also learnt a great deal from them,” said one, pride writ large over his face. Six USAF F-15Cs were pitted against a range of Jaguars, MiG-21s, MiG-27s and the “fearsome” Sukhoi-30s.

    The exercise was meant to evaluate tactics, training and operational procedures. No senior officer from either country was willing to go on record on who scored most points. But some Indian pilots claimed the “kill ratio” was 4:1 in their favour.

    Air Marshal Ajit Bhavnani, who is senior Air Staff Officer at the Central Air Command, was more tempered. He said the exercise concluded with “mutual respect for each others’ skills” and that it should not be viewed as a “boxing match”.

    http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_587246,0008.htm

    in reply to: India to Build own AWAACS #2694413
    codrix
    Participant

    Originally posted by phrozenflame
    ok my question: Reportedly the plane can detect & track? 50 targets right?..well isnt the majority of these going to be India’s own planes???

    AWACS have got FOF (Friend or Foe) identification system, which helps an AWACS to identify weather a target is a Friend or Foe.

    I think the 50 targets taken into account by the AWACS should be Foe targets, the Friendly aircrafts would be ignored.

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)