dark light

Arkali106

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 114 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Yak-38 Forger Info #2265672
    Arkali106
    Participant

    http://translate.google.com/#auto/en/%D0%B2%D1%81%D0%BF%D1%83-36%D1%81%20%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B0%D0%BF%D1%83%D1%88%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B9%20%D0%B3%D1%88-23%D0%BB

    http://www.acig.org/artman/publish/article_488.shtml

    Early in the design phase it had been intended to incorporate a pair of 225P 23-mm cannon in the fixed wing sections, but these were never adopted; a single aircraft was test-fitted with a twin-barrel 23-mm GSh-23L cannon in an under-fuselage VSPU-36 pack (some reports suggest this arrangement was actually an operational fit, although only available when a STOL profile was used). Since there was no standard provision for internal gun armament, twin-barrel 23-mm UPK-23-250 cannon pods were a regular fixture on the outer wing pylons.

    VSPU-36 Gun Pack:
    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/ru/3/32/VSPU-36_on_Yak-38.png
    http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A4%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB:VSPU-36_on_Yak-38.png

    Also, Paralay’s photo shows an R-60 on the inner pylon, while the chart does not indicate that as an option.

    in reply to: LM Cuda AAM #1791243
    Arkali106
    Participant

    What if this missile has a millimeter wave radar and can also be used for air to ground applications?

    Could JSF can go on a mission carrying 12 “long range Hellfires” and defend itself with them if it encounters enemy fighters?

    in reply to: FA-XX, FX replacing the F22 and SH #2317007
    Arkali106
    Participant

    JH-7B? – slightly stealthed?

    in reply to: Impressive Weapons Load 2 (again) #2321762
    Arkali106
    Participant

    All those other planes heft a silly load to make good promo pics to put on sale brochures. The J10 is not for sale yet so there is no need for such publicity stunts.

    If any of those planes were flying combat missions, they would never be leaving home with so many missiles, so its all for show.

    PLAAF planes are rarely pictured with weapons. If they are carrying live weapons, its for live fire exercises, and you don’t carry more than what you intend to shoot. The rest of the time, they are carrying blue training rounds, but again, you never carry more than maybe a couple of those.

    The Typhoon and Rafale are in a different weight class than the J-10; they carry more ATA missiles in combat. The F-16 and Gripen are more similar to the J-10 and carry similar loads:

    http://previous.presstv.ir/photo/20110321/mazimi20110321002229140.jpg

    https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-AP6u70v1CUY/TYUajzPgt9I/AAAAAAAAAmc/ormouQaKfIA/s1600/AdA+Rafale+Libya+19Mar11B.jpg

    http://www.athenswire.com/wp-content/plugins/rss-poster/cache/27816_libya_f16_390_2103.jpg

    http://www.saabgroup.com/Global/Documents%20and%20Images/Gripen%20C/046afa_040617_0120_tmb.jpg

    The Gripen carries a load similar to the J-10.

    in reply to: China's upcoming 5th G fighter–J-20 prototype is ready #2338082
    Arkali106
    Participant

    I don’t think there is room for side bays. A deep central bay could fit between the landing gear. With staggered carriage it could fit maybe 4-6 PL-12 and 2 smaller missiles?

    in reply to: China's upcoming 5th G fighter–J-20 prototype is ready #2339883
    Arkali106
    Participant

    http://i.imgur.com/6ISaR.jpg

    What’s the vertical thing I circled in red?

    in reply to: China's upcoming 5th G fighter–J-20 prototype is ready #2341740
    Arkali106
    Participant

    I’m having trouble visualizing the aircraft behind the smudge. From the angle it is facing, based on the tail, I would have expected the wing to be sticking out past where the smudge ends on the left side. If it is an all-moving tail, maybe that explains it.

    Arkali106
    Participant

    Allegedly, in exchange for Israeli training, air defense contracts, and drones, Georgia provided access to two air bases. These would have provided Israel with an attack route into the north of Iran. Azerbaijan and Armenia would have been overflown. Israeli aircraft could get to the Georgian bases by overflying Turkey, or, with Israeli-Turkish relations at a low point, they could fly over the Aegean Sea, Greece, Bulgaria, and the Black Sea to preposition to Georgia.

    One problem with this is that the route from Georgia to Iranian nuclear sites is about the same distance from Israel to those nuclear sites. However, the issue of overflying Arab states would be mitigated, and the Israelis could do a two prong air attack (or maybe even three prong if a formation of aircraft approach Iran by coming up the Persian Gulf from the Arabian Sea – the long route, and a distance which Israel has apparently covered in aerial refueling exercises).

    The other problem is that during the Russia-Georgia war, Russian forces made a beeline to the two airfields in Georgia, and captured all equipment which was already there. Apparently this included Israeli drones.

    in reply to: PAK-FA Saga Episode 13 #2419285
    Arkali106
    Participant

    The shot from the top reminds me of something:

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/2/20/Vought_V-173.jpg

    Arkali106
    Participant

    You could also look into the USAF, US Navy, and Virgin Atlantic experiments with biofuels. If I recall correctly these fuels have lower emissions?

    in reply to: Rise of the Sea Gripen #2038166
    Arkali106
    Participant

    Well, according to Saab the reason why they are revisiting the idea of Sea Gripen (it’s actually not a new idea) is that a “Potential customer” recently approached Saab and asked for information.

    So either Saab is lying or your analysis ignored a potential customer….

    China?

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #1998218
    Arkali106
    Participant

    That shows how huge the Typhoon class is.

    in reply to: PLAN Carrier Updates. #1998505
    Arkali106
    Participant

    Is there ever a time when the Kuz isn’t in dock for repair, overhaul and upgrade!

    On a serious note the impression I got was the Su-33 would be upgraded then operated alongside the Mig-29K, I would think she has space for a mixed air group.

    I have heard that part of the modernization entails removing the SS-N-19 Shipwreck missiles and expanding the hanger.

    in reply to: Canards and stealth. . . #2407125
    Arkali106
    Participant

    Would it be possible to make canards from a radar-transparent material, with only the actuator at the joint being potentially reflective?

    in reply to: Foreign engines for the Shinshin #2408766
    Arkali106
    Participant

    Its a very small jet, no much bigger than f-5 style.

    I’m fairly certain any production aircraft would be larger. The prototypes might be 2/3 scale? From the cutaways I’ve seen there isn’t much internal volume for a weapons bay.

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 114 total)