dark light

Arkali106

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 114 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: present status of iranian F-14.. #2413096
    Arkali106
    Participant

    iranian AF official claim that F-14 fleet being retrofit with “home made radar and engine”.
    surely he mean russian radar and engine.

    Not necessarily. When Iran domestically manufactures parts they call it an “upgrade.” And those domestic parts could of course include modest improvements to certain things.

    in reply to: Rafale v Typhoon and the F22… #2415995
    Arkali106
    Participant

    Those video screenshots of the Mica IR launch show the simulator Lock On:

    http://i717.photobucket.com/albums/ww177/tspencer227/Screenshots/LOMAC/ScreenShot_033.jpg

    in reply to: US Navy plan to ease "figher gap" #2431225
    Arkali106
    Participant

    I don’t see why more Supers aren’t simply bought and cancel the F-35C?…

    How many years from service is the F-35C, vs how many years from service is the UCAV?

    in reply to: Smoking Planes #2432919
    Arkali106
    Participant

    The RD-33 is known for being smokey:

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/7534470@N08/909605540/

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode 11.0 #2391536
    Arkali106
    Participant

    I’m still agnostic about that underwing “weapons bay.”

    in reply to: Northrop-Loral F-19A Specter #2392099
    Arkali106
    Participant

    Yo Joe!

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v708/2001somws6/gi%20joe/oldjoe019.jpg

    in reply to: F-35 News and Discussion #2394479
    Arkali106
    Participant

    He doesn’t say “in each bay”, he says “in the bay”. I read that as 4 total internally carried.

    Otherwise, I would like to see how 4 Meteors could fit in the bay below:

    http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/planes/f35/f35-bay.jpg

    in reply to: 6th generation combat aircraft? #2397657
    Arkali106
    Participant

    PS. Kapedani ironically the aircraft you have shown doesnt have any new revolutionary technology on it as someone already pointed out it is mixture of old technologies.

    The same could also be said for the F-22. Plenty of previous aircraft had one or two of its “defining traits”: super maneuverability, stealth, internal weapons bays, excellent sensors, super cruise. But it puts them all on one platform.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode 11.0 #2399494
    Arkali106
    Participant

    😎

    Are there weapon bays outboard of the engines as Aviation Week said?

    in reply to: What is this plane? #2399495
    Arkali106
    Participant

    The thing circled could be an engine pod on the ground, however it slopes down in the front, which differs from a regular Il-76 engine:

    http://www.aerospaceweb.org/aircraft/transport-m/il76/il76_10.jpg

    It kind of resembles a Il-76PP with the front of the fairing removed:

    http://www.airliners.net/photo/Russia—Air/Ilyushin-Il-76PP/0909403/M/

    However, the top of the object is farther below the fuselage color change line than on the confirmed Il-76PP.

    I think Occam’s Razor says some sort of engine pod laying on the ground….

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2401120
    Arkali106
    Participant

    Ares Blog claims there are two “underwing” bays outboard of the engine nacelles.

    Where exactly are they? And it is unclear what they can hold….

    Are they behind the main landing gear? And what can they carry? R-73 and R-77?

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2401732
    Arkali106
    Participant

    Whut, the mighty Gripen NG is not up to it!?

    Actually I suggested quite some time ago that Norway should:

    1. Buy (or lease!) Gripen NG
    2. Develop a 5. gen PAK FA killer together with Sweden, South Korea (and perhaps Brazil? :cool:)
    3. phase over to the new a/c if/when Russia starts flexing her muscles with PAK FA :p

    The reason for suggesting this was that I suspected that “the F-35 would not be up to it”.

    The politicians did not listen to me, of course. They never listen to what I say. 🙁

    Why does Norway need a PAK-FA killer? It doesn’t have a Flanker killer….

    in reply to: MiG-31 Questions #2409628
    Arkali106
    Participant

    Anyone with higher rez pics of Mig-31 version carryng R-33/33s/37 under wings?

    i collected these few, i think someone asked for earlier..

    I believe those are Kh-38 Kilter anti-radar missiles.

    in reply to: Haiti international relief effort through air and sea #2414867
    Arkali106
    Participant

    Because they are not there for helping, their there for re-implementing the oppressive regiems, go to the links, I posted, I’m not crazy, MY COUNTRY unfortunatly doesn’t help black people out of love, they do it out of “ECONOMIC” interests.

    Let’s not forget that Haiti will be the new location for the Guantanamo Bay prison, and where Dick Cheney can finally bury the evidence that he brought down the Twin Towers. :rolleyes:

    Arkali106
    Participant

    SA-2’s can be force fired and manually fused. And they have changed about twenty times over the years. The SA-2’s that live on today are not the same as the ones used in the skies of Vietnam. Plus its not always military targets they can be used upon. Isreal can and will be concerned.

    They can be used as surface to surface rockets as well.

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 114 total)