dark light

djnik

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 421 through 435 (of 837 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russian Space & Missile [ News/Discussion] #1815456
    djnik
    Participant

    You keep missing one glaringly obvious point. The treaty is for the REDUCTION of missiles and warheads not REPLACEMENT with something better.

    Yeah well thats why i said,its a show for general public only i guess:)

    in reply to: Mig-21 and Mig-29 at Batajnica AB – new photos #2592996
    djnik
    Participant

    My mistake…I wasn’t talking about our airforce. I meant real airforces with real airplanes. :diablo: US, UK, Russia, France, Germany, Nato,…..thanks for pointing that out. I didn’t know that it cost $10,000 per flight hour! I thought it’d be down in the $3-4000 mark. Yeah, like i said…the pilots complete the academy, but only a small handful (2-3) are kept in the airforce. The rest use their diploma as a BS/BA to find a job with a civil/commercial airliner. Free education…can’t beat that.

    Yes,i read in the german Flug Revue magazin. The new SMT is supposed to have costs dropped to $5 500 which is about 40%-50% less than the costs of flying the A model since in the same megazine Germans mentioned the price of flying their own (now ex) Mig-29s to be about $10 000 per flight hour.

    http://www.flug-revue.rotor.com/FRheft/FRH0111/FR0111d.htm

    My contacts here in the US tell me that when they’re training against “hinds” (real or mock ups), they are always flying in pairs. Their turn radius is slower than an apaches/cobras, b/c it has the troop compartment. So it’s really more of a blackhawk; armed to the *ucking teeth.

    Yes hinds always go in pairs.Well the Apaches also do not attack solo themselves. The usefull thing about the Hinds indeed is the the troop compartment.

    in reply to: Good old times…Yugoslav Air force early jet age #2593249
    djnik
    Participant

    I’ll see what i can find,but it will have to wait for tomorrow…

    in reply to: Mig-21 and Mig-29 at Batajnica AB – new photos #2593282
    djnik
    Participant

    Those are indeed Serbian Mi-24s that were used by JSO special unit and were bough by the police.I have read in the news that police wanted to give these away to the army for free,but army had no money to overhaul them.I wonder how they came up on this website,i mean who filed for their sale.Army?

    However,the 1st photo of Serbian Mi-24,looks like its photoshopped(look at the tail rotor)

    in reply to: Mig-21 and Mig-29 at Batajnica AB – new photos #2593306
    djnik
    Participant

    I don’t think the fuel costs would be that high. Now adays, pilots are getting 15-20 hours a week in a simulator and 150 real flight hours a year behind the stick. Most of our “top gun” pilots are in their 40s. About 20 pilots graduate the academy every year to fill transport, helo, and “jet” (galeb, orao, mig-21) fighters. After they’re trained in these roles, most get posted to civil air services around europe. Lufthansa is a biggy. These pilots go through the academy to achieve almost like a BS from an american college.

    Are you refering to Serbian Air Force pilots getting 150 flight hours per year?I think that is extremely overrated. The fuel is a big problem my friend,the military does not have sufficient money to pay.You should know that for example Mig-29s costed $10 000 per flight hour. I am surprised so many pilots graduate the academy,knowing that the future of the air force is uncertain.

    Yeah I know. I took a tour of Moma Stanojlovic in my teens right after Allied force. Utva has been rebuilt up to par and I thought Moma had been rebuilt and renovated?

    They have been rebuilt but not the the potential before the bombing,just like the country as a whole.

    I really want to see them start operating a number of Mi-24MkIII super hinds. Focusing on AD systems and Hind “transports” (our gamas and other gazelles are under OSCE regulations as attack choppers – we’re only allowed to have 55) is the way to go. Operating at least one squadron of about 30 of these beasts would be awesome. Work out a deal with S. Africas ATE to upgrade machines that the russians could provide. (they owe serbia something close to USD 400 million) What do you think of that?

    Lets first hope that the money Russia owns to Serbia doesnt go to private accounts,as the corruption is still present. Hinds are very usefull helicopters and when equiped with good electronics and precise missiles,they can be deadly.However,they are rather unmanouverable but i guess the tactics to use them to best effect can be devised.

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile [ News/Discussion] #1815523
    djnik
    Participant

    Well there is a difference in what a missile is able to carry and what it is allowed to carry (by the threaty).Maybe that is what they were referring to when they said 10 warheads,ie. it has enough throw weight to carry 10 warheads.In reallity it would carry for example 3 warheads plus numerous pen aids and decoys.

    Well i guess the new missiles to come are better then the SS-24 and the Peacekeeper.For example,shorter first stage burn times of the first stage(minimizing detection on launch),cheaper to maintain etc…All good reasons to replace them and show the general public how both sides are disarming,while instead…

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile [ News/Discussion] #1815531
    djnik
    Participant

    But where’s the sense in getting rid of perfectly good SS-24s if you’re just going to replace them? And how is getting rid of SS-24 to comply with treaty and then REPLACING them with new still honoring the treaty?

    Well first of all you must realise that we,normal people,probably do not know all the details about the threaties,international incidents etc.Think of Cuban crisis for example. Soviets removed their missiles from Cuba and in return the US removed its IRBMs from Turkey.Who knew at the time they were there?General public certanly not.

    SS-24 was highly mobile,being rail based due to Russia having an extensive rail network. That might have been another problem for the US,such a potent weapon hard to detect and destroy.Therefore,they might have somehow brought it in the threaty.Also its number of warheads (10 if i recall) was a problem. The new fielded models have therefore a lower number of warheads and are silo based,just like other types in service with Russia today.

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile [ News/Discussion] #1815552
    djnik
    Participant

    Somebody tell me again why we got rid of 50 Peacekeepers :confused:

    Cause i guess Russians got rid of something they had.

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile [ News/Discussion] #1815553
    djnik
    Participant

    The Russians have some stored SS-18/19 missile with them which can be activated if required ie Fuelled and Ready for combat duty and probably thats what they are going to do , to tide over the number situation , Besides ramping up production of Topol-M and Bulava.
    [/B]

    Do you know how many SS-18/19s do the Russians have stored?Are they the missiles that got dismantled from Ukraine or new builts that were never fielded?

    in reply to: Is the F-22 Worth it? #2593790
    djnik
    Participant

    Lets see how it performs in combat first…

    in reply to: Mig-21 and Mig-29 at Batajnica AB – new photos #2593828
    djnik
    Participant

    I think a buyer could acquire 2 squadrons of 24 planes each for 2 billion dollars. The only problem is, no new interceptor aircraft will be purchased until 2010-2012. They’re just focusing on AD units right now.

    Exactly.AD is more importat,especially cause they do not have money for the fuel. But by 2010-2012 they will have to school some new pilots as well,a small number at least.

    I still think that 1 or 2 Il-76 transports are needed. They can be used for UN missions in africa, haiti, wherever. The C-27a spartan is the plane I would be pushing for though. Maybe up to six initially; they’re small/medium sized and need very low qualitiy airfields and strips to land and take off. They would have been very useful in ferrying material and people during the floods this past week or so. Not very expensive either. Greece began operating a squadron of 12 about 2 years ago for not to much cash at all. I’d have to dig up one of my old articles to give you guys a figure.

    Il-76s would be usefull as you mentioned,especially not that we are getting involved more and more in UN operations.Also they would be valuable for transport withing the country,being much faster than the rail or road transport.I think they do not need more than 2 of the Il-76s and they can get some more An-26s or even An-32s.

    No, it doesn’t pay off to open a production line for 50 trainers, much less 30. The Soko production facilities were packed up and shipped to UTVA and Momcilo …. repair facilities at the beginning of 92′. This operation was conducted by General Zivomir Ninkovic. Basically, everything was stripped down and shipped out. They couldn’t leave that machinery in the hands of the enemy.

    There are some nice photos of Moma Stanojlovic and Utva showing the airframes of G-4s and Orao’s unfinished,however,these facilities were badly damaged and production of new airplanes is rather impossible.Overhaul is what they are concentrating on now.

    in reply to: Good old times…Yugoslav Air force early jet age #2593904
    djnik
    Participant

    nice pics indeed…How about some helicopters and transport planes (not exactly jets thougth, but…)??

    Well i guess we could open a new thread.What time periods did you have specifically in mind?

    in reply to: Hypothetical Iraqi Air Force? #2593980
    djnik
    Participant

    Serbian scientists and engineers were helping Saddam with missiles and our construction companies built many of the Iraqi “hardened” airfields.They did not help with the airforce altgough we overhauled some of their Migs and Mils.

    in reply to: Good old times…Yugoslav Air force early jet age #2594163
    djnik
    Participant

    http://www.eichhorn.ws/assets/images/sjf_s_451_m.jpg

    Here is a picture of the S-451M Matica, the first Yugoslav jet aircraft. It was powered by two Turbomeca Palas engines. Then they built the J-451MM (J = jurisnik) which was a single seat CAS aircraft. It had two Turbomeca Marbord II engines, top speed of 800 km/h, service ceiling of 12,000 m, range of 760 kms, length of 8.05 m, and take off mass of 2435 kg. A small number of prototypes of each plane (< 5) were built, flown by the VOC (test center) for a few years, then retired. My favorite is the P-453 with W-shaped wings.

    Same airplane today 🙁

    in reply to: Good old times…Yugoslav Air force early jet age #2594166
    djnik
    Participant

    I think it’s AA-1 ALKALI

    http://www.air-defense.net/dossier/244/intro244.jpg

    http://www.military.cz/russia/air/weapons/rockets/aam/rs2/RS-2_4.jpg

    Ah yes! Thank you:)

    It seems indeed it is AA-1. I guess that Mig-21 was one of the first batch,as they switched to AA-2s soon. I would consider AA-1 to be rather ineffective,as it was the first generation missile.Well, AA-2 wasnt any better either.

Viewing 15 posts - 421 through 435 (of 837 total)