dark light

djnik

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 837 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Serbian Air force – present and future prospects #2558201
    djnik
    Participant

    These photos were unfortenutely taken before the OAF. The facility was heavily attacked and severely damaged. It has been largely rebuilt and i have posted some photos in this thread already of the facility (first page).

    The overhaul of the Mig-21s,G-4s and J-22s is going at a low pace. The airplanes are going trough a general overhaul in order to keep them airworthy. Only the airframes in the best condition and with lowest flight hours on them are selected.

    Below are the photos of Mig-21s presently found at “Moma Stanojlovic” facility.

    djnik
    Participant

    Great array of pictures.

    Especially enjoyed the ones of a certain aircraft….thanks.

    I am glad that you liked them;) Had you in mind when i was taking those!

    Anyways,as you are in the US AF,do you know why US AF airplanes are not allowed to fly at airshows abroad?

    in reply to: Serbian Air force – present and future prospects #2559543
    djnik
    Participant

    I’m surprised at the high quality that the gazelles have been maintained at!!! There are still quite a few operational and in fantastic working order. At least somethings going right.

    They were locally produced and hence there was an abundance of spare parts. Some of them(GAMA version) also have targeting equipment above the cockpits.

    in reply to: HAF F-16 collision (?) with THK F-16 over Agaian #2559546
    djnik
    Participant

    I do not see the other two threads as you say :confused:

    Anyways,i have a video of a Greek F-16 acquiring Turkish F-16 with a Sidwinder missile.You can hear the screech when the missile is locked onto the target.Rather unplesent sound.

    in reply to: HAF F-16 collision (?) with THK F-16 over Agaian #2559831
    djnik
    Participant

    Greek and Turkish planes collide

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/5008178.stm

    Greek and Turkish F-16 jets have crashed into the southern Aegean Sea after colliding in mid-air.

    The collision, near Karpathos island, occurred after Greece scrambled a jet to intercept the Turkish aircraft, a Greek government official said.

    The Turkish pilot was rescued after ejecting safely, but there is no official word on the Greek pilot’s fate. A search and rescue is under way.

    The two countries have a long-standing dispute over the Aegean.

    Turkey insists Greek airspace extends only 10km (6 miles) offshore, not 16km (10 miles) as Greece maintains.

    In the past, the two have come close to armed conflict over the dispute.

    Nato has previously warned the two member states that their frequent mock dogfights in the area are dangerous.

    Explosion in the sky

    The collision was spotted by passengers on board a plane travelling to Cairo, according to eyewitnesses quoted on Greek television.

    Greek F-16 fighters (file picture)
    The planes were F-16 fighter jets, used by both air forces
    They reportedly saw an explosion in the sky.

    Greek government spokesman Evangelos Antonaros said the planes went down after they had touched wing-tips.

    “It was likely an interception operation,” he said.

    Defence Minister Vecdi Gonul said the country’s military chief was in talks with his Greek counterpart over the collision, state-run Anatolia news agency reports.

    “We are also waiting for exact information,” he said.

    Turkish officials said the Turkish pilot had been picked up by a passing merchant ship.

    The Greek authorities said they had sent out search and rescue teams, including a frigate.

    “Several Super Puma rescue helicopters are on their way to the area,” a Greek government official told Reuters news agency.

    Incidents like this keep happening on a frequent basis. My Greek friends fathers are pilots and they keep telling them about these “mock” dogfights between the Greek and Turkish airplanes happening quite often.

    djnik
    Participant

    Yeah, thanks for the pics Djnik!

    Is it just me, or do you look like this Norwegian TV celebraty? :p

    http://www.tvnorge.no/bilder/03/48/17/23/Lerer_Sigurd_4JP.jpgNone.medium.jpg

    Ehm…i dont think so :rolleyes:

    But my fiance is Norwegian 😉

    in reply to: Serbian Air force – present and future prospects #2560170
    djnik
    Participant

    Is this an Iraqi Mig-23? When were they fitted with refuling probes?Anyways,the photo should represent the airplane at Batajnica AB during the overhaul.This airplane was returned to Iraq before the hostilities began. I am waiting for your suggestions.

    in reply to: Serbian Air force – present and future prospects #2560185
    djnik
    Participant

    Some more photos from “Moma Stanojlovic” overhaul facility at Batajnica AB

    in reply to: Serbian Air force – present and future prospects #2560214
    djnik
    Participant

    what will serbia accurie as new trasport and do you think they will accurie them before new multirole jet fighters.

    It depends on the priorities that come up in the near future. It largely depends on how much we get involved in international peacekeeping missions. And of course, the financial situation in the country.

    in reply to: NASM photos from today #2560219
    djnik
    Participant

    That’s what I figured you meant. They had one of them hanging from the ceiling 😀

    Heh cool:)

    Thanks for the photo!

    As i am a Luftwaffe fan (made my first Luftwaffe website at the age of 14! and had 250 000 visitors untill it got shut down),every additional picture is a plus!

    Keep up the good work!

    in reply to: Montenegro Air Force!? #2560222
    djnik
    Participant

    I think they could barely run those Orao’s in Montangro i think they will get a helicopter fleet of UH-1s and Bell 206s.

    There are no Orao’s in Montenegro. Galeb G-4s are based in Podgorica and they will most probably be transfered to bases in Serbia.

    in reply to: NASM photos from today #2560275
    djnik
    Participant

    Which missile was the X-4 again? The wire-guided AAM? I’m assuming you’re not referring to the US X-plane, by the way.

    Yep,the Ruhrstahl/Kramer X-4 missile.

    In early 1943, work began on the X-4 air-to-air wire-guided missile by Dr. Kramer at Ruhrstahl. The missile received a development order in the summer of 1943 and was given the number 8-344 by the RLM, and was developed to give fighters a chance to down the ever increasing number of Allied bombers from outside of their defensive gun range.
    The X-4 featured a tapering, cigar-shaped fuselage, with four small swept wings and four smaller tail fins. At the ends of two of the opposing wings were small pods which held the wires that unwound during the X-4’s flight. On the wing tips of the other two main wings were simple flares to aid the pilot in keeping the X-4 on it’s intended path. The tail unit contained small spoilers which could control the missiles pitch and yaw. Power was supplied by the BMW 109-548 rocket engine. The fuel was held in a cleverly designed spiral fuel tank (to save space). A piston was fitted into each coiled fuel tank, and the fuel was pushed into the combustion chamber at the rear of the missile by discharging compressed air to force the piston against the fuel. The two fuels (R-Stoff or Tonka and SV-Stoff or Salbei) were hypergolic, which means they ignited upon contact with each other. A warhead weighing 20 kg (44.1 lbs) with a destructive blast radius of 7.6 meters (25 feet) was mounted in the nose of the missile, being detonated by the pilot, impact or by an acoustical proximity fuse, tuned to the pitch of the bomber’s propellers.
    A typical flight would have the carrier aircraft reaching the same altitude or slightly higher than the target. The X-4 would be released from the ETC 70 or 71 bomb rack, and would spin at approximately one revolution per second (this was achieved by having the wings slightly offset from the missile center line), the gyro being used mainly for line of flight only. The pilot can then steer the missile (FuG 510/238 “Düsseldorf/Detmold” system) by the use of a small joystick in the cockpit. Seven seconds after launching, the acoustic proximity and impact fuses are armed. A self-destruction fuse is also actuated about 30 seconds after launch. The Kranich acoustical fuse (tuned to the pitch of the bombers propellers) would activate the firing mechanism within 40 meters (131 feet), with an additional slight delay allowed for the distance to close to within five meters (16 feet) before detonation of the warhead. A maximum speed of 1152 km/h (716 mph) could be reached; the range of attack was to be between 1.5 km and 3.5 km (.93 mile and 2.2 miles), although there was 5.5 km (3.4 miles) of wire on the spools.
    By August 1944, 225 prototype X-4s had been completed, with the first air launched test occurring on August 11, 1944 by an Fw 190. Tests continued through early February 1945, also by Ju 88s. Test flights were also undertaken by a Me 262 jet fighter with two X-4 missiles under the wings outboard of the jet nacelle, but were not launched.
    The production of the X-4 was simple, the fuselage being made up in three sections; a turned steel nose which contained the warhead, a cast aluminum center section and a tail section made from sheet aluminum. The design of the missile was set up so that unskilled labor could assemble the missiles, indeed, the sheet metal sections assembled by tabs in one section being pushed into slots of another section. The plywood wings were secured to the missile’s center section with simple nuts and bolts. Approximately 1000-1300 airframes had been finished at Ruhrstahl’s Brackwede factory by early 1945, and were awaiting their rocket motors, when the BMW facility at Stargard was bombed, destroying all the finished BMW 109-548 rocket engines. This missile was intended to be issued in numbers to the Luftwaffe by the early Spring of 1945, but the bombing of the BMW rocket engine factory, and the war’s end prevented the combat use of the world’s first guided air-to-air missile

    It would have been interesting to see how it would have performed :rolleyes:

    djnik
    Participant

    Why does Netherlands need ships of that size and Marines?

    in reply to: NASM photos from today #2560283
    djnik
    Participant

    No more pics of the German SAM, I had to contort a little to get that one anyway! And the next-to-last thing is the old Homing Overlay Experiment for an anti-missile system. More info here:

    http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/app4/hoe.html

    Thanks a lot;)

    I scratch built a model of Rheintochter(along with an X-4) out of wood couple of years ago,thats why i was wondering about that missile!

    in reply to: My afternoon with VFA-201 Hunters #2560315
    djnik
    Participant

    Great photos! 🙂

    Keep them coming!

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 837 total)