dark light

Super Nimrod

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 953 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Still no New Thomson Airways livery #568377
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    Got my holiday flights come through today. Same flight last year was an FCA flight number and this year its a TOM :rolleyes: Half expecting it to be the same old 757 as well, with maybe a few rebranding stickers on it.

    in reply to: Mystery Aicraft spotted by satellite! #571974
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    DavidS is correct. Go and sit in a car park after a shower on a warm day and you will see this a lot. You often see the reverse as well, when the ground under the vehicle is dry when it pulls off and all around it is wet. It really is very common

    in reply to: EMALS – oops? #2041912
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    Don’t worry guys, we Brits have a fall back position for generation 2 CVF if EMAL’s fails.

    Ever at the cutting edge of inovation in its carrier fleet, BVT will be instructed by the government to start a Private finance iniative with a budget of about £500 to go out and procure some rather large Bungee cord :eek::diablo::cool::rolleyes:

    in reply to: What RAF aircraft are capable of Air to Air Refueling #2448398
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    Also, aren’t all legacy Nimrods currently banned from air to air refuelling due to the accidents that there have been ?

    Not sure what the status is with the MRA4 ?

    in reply to: What RAF aircraft are capable of Air to Air Refueling #2448852
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    Also, aren’t all legacy Nimrods currently banned from air to air refuelling due to the accidents that there have been ?

    Not sure what the status is with the MRA4 ?

    in reply to: More C-17s considered harmful #2448843
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    Exactly; Irtusk, if you could persuade the USAF to take your point of view and buy a few 777 freighters and trade in a good few C-17 for 50 cents in the dollar, be sure to ring Canada, Australia and first of all the UK, as they will happily take them off their hands at that sort of price.:D

    You will notice though that other countries do kind of agree with you. The UK procures combi civilian stuff that can do a bit of everything. The new A-330 tankers will have good cargo and passenger capability as well as the ability to deliver fuel. The current Tristars and VC-10’s are similar jacks of all trade but are old and not good at everything.

    Did the USAF ever fit cargo doors to th KC135’s. Couldn’t they do a limited roll like this ?

    in reply to: More C-17s considered harmful #2449305
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    Exactly; Irtusk, if you could persuade the USAF to take your point of view and buy a few 777 freighters and trade in a good few C-17 for 50 cents in the dollar, be sure to ring Canada, Australia and first of all the UK, as they will happily take them off their hands at that sort of price.:D

    You will notice though that other countries do kind of agree with you. The UK procures combi civilian stuff that can do a bit of everything. The new A-330 tankers will have good cargo and passenger capability as well as the ability to deliver fuel. The current Tristars and VC-10’s are similar jacks of all trade but are old and not good at everything.

    Did the USAF ever fit cargo doors to th KC135’s. Couldn’t they do a limited roll like this ?

    in reply to: British and French nuclear submarines collided #2042521
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    Thanks guys, so it sounds like its going to be a big’ish dockyard job.

    in reply to: British and French nuclear submarines collided #2042727
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    A French aquaintance tells me that AFP reported in France in the last couple of days that the French SSBN was also found to have damage to the Sail and to one of the fins once it got home. I have searched on the web but can’t see anything in English anywhere about additional damage.

    Maybe Merlock could give us an update from the French perspective ?

    in reply to: British and French nuclear submarines collided #2043467
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    They interviewed 1SL Band on the radio this afternoon and he was at pains to mention no tow was needed. The press got the wrong end of the stick coz the normal birthing tug was in attendance and they automatically assumed serious damage :rolleyes:

    in reply to: British and French nuclear submarines collided #2043568
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    Yes, but statistically the chances of them colliding rendomly are mighty close to zero even if they couldn’t hear each other. There must be more to this than meets the eye, still we will probably have to wait 30 years or so before they release the file. 🙁

    in reply to: Incident with BA Aircraft at London City #575018
    Super Nimrod
    Participant
    in reply to: Incident with BA Aircraft at London City #575024
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    Now they are saying it was a BA Flight from Amsterdam and the passengers went down the chutes and some went to hospital

    in reply to: More A400M problems… #2475217
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    Its been said on other web sites that 12 tonnes is an enormous amount and must have been known about for some time.

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world #2046425
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    Another BBC film of Type 45. A five minute tour including the very large Ops room and details of the bridge and accomodation

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7856247.stm

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 953 total)