dark light

Super Nimrod

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 376 through 390 (of 953 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Italian STOVL Carrier – Cavour ? #2041045
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    That last photo of the deck at night is great 😀

    She certainly looks a nice ship.

    The next trick is to get the RN to plan for something similar to eventually replace HMS Ocean

    in reply to: A400 sees delay!! #2540729
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    Digging this one up again as the UK quietly announced yesterday the widely expected order for the 6th C-17 to be delivered in 2008. There are cost details in the announcement but no details of what extra they are getting for the money.

    http://www.mod.uk/DefenceInternet/DefenceNews/EquipmentAndLogistics/RafGetsSixthC17Globemaster.htm

    in reply to: CVF #2042830
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    PMN1, well that is certainly something I had not considered previously 😮

    in reply to: Heavy Jet Transports #2545897
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    Another thing to consider is flight takeoff and landing cycles. Don’t western designs usually have a significantly longer life than Russian ones ? This will also effect the overall lifetime costs.

    in reply to: UK military helicopters #2546805
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    As said above though the Sea King Commando HC4’s must be getting long in the tooth. Last time I looked there were something like 40 of them. They will need to be replaced by Merlins in due course.

    in reply to: UK military helicopters #2546818
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    Yep, Thats the one. Service life extension for 35 machines until 2022. Here is the official announcement

    http://www.raf.mod.uk/news/index.cfm?storyid=AF8A62E2-1143-EC82-2E0EA651DB8B083B

    They have lost a couple in accidents since then. Also I recall there were some pictures on a website of some Pumas in an MOD vehicle store that they had purchased secondhand from South Africa to act as an attrition reserve. Although not flyable they would be made so if needed. Don’t know how many they bought though or if there are options to buy more.

    in reply to: UK military helicopters #2546828
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    Guys, Wasn’t there an announcemnet recently that the MOD had appointed someone to look at options to completely rebuild the remaining Pumas ? They may not be being replaced at all ……………..

    in reply to: Algeria orders AW101's #2546849
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    I guess with the Oil & Gas price being what it is Algeria has a few more options moneywise and decided to spend a bit more than they originally planned

    in reply to: East Midlands Snow Closed. #576579
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    The snowplough drivers are usually made up of various Ops folks as said. Usually anyone whom can be spared by their company who is twiddling their thumbs due to the snow; fuellers, baggage, waste, air tug drivers etc. Its not as ad-hoc as that though as some of the machines are actually quite specialised and need several days training to learn so there is an active list of trained operatives who usually get a 1-2 day annual refresher in Oct/Nov.

    My brother does this at Stansted, and usually gets about 4-8 days a years work on ‘snow patrol’ which usually means sitting in the hanger waiting for the white stuff, and maybe only 0-3 days a year actually clearing at most. As you can imagine the equipment spends most of its life doing nothing and even after 20 years might only have seen a couple of hundred hours usage down south.

    in reply to: VC10 AND RB211s #576581
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    Or a dozen Nimrod MRA4’s where a much larger and expensive rebuild has occurred :diablo: 😮

    in reply to: F-117 Developments #2549554
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    I am sure I remember reading somewhere that the F-117 had no flaps. That combined with the angle of its wings must have meant an extremely high landing speed. Certainly way too high for a carrier approach. Anyone know for sure ?

    in reply to: A400 sees delay!! #2550040
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    Portagee, Welcome.

    Maybe it was the fact that the UK Ministry of defence were having to frequently charter the retired and sold off Belfasts from Heavylift a good few years ago that made them realise what they had lost and that it might be a good idea to get a similar lift capability again ? :diablo: :rolleyes:

    When you compare the spec of the Belfast and the A400M in some respects they are reasonably similar. The A400M will be better at the tactical roll though.

    in reply to: Quite Possibly The Most Stunning MD-11 In The World! #578781
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    Fedex “only” operate 58 of the estimated 191 MD11s still active worldwide. 😎

    Don’t the RAF operate a similar proportion of the remaining Tristars ? Their paint scheme is nowhere near as cool though :diablo:

    in reply to: A400 sees delay!! #2551909
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    EADS worried about the engines and that it may delay things further, but nothing really specific is mentioned.

    http://today.reuters.co.uk/news/articleinvesting.aspx?type=companyOutlooksNews&storyID=2007-11-08T074112Z_01_PAC008895_RTRIDST_0_EADS-RESULTS-A400M.XML

    in reply to: heads up BBC2 tonight Lancaster crash in Scotland #1296440
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    And ?

    (I missed it) 🙁

Viewing 15 posts - 376 through 390 (of 953 total)