It had a small frontal cross section and narrow wings. I remember reading somewhere that it was possibly the first aircraft capable of supercruise in level flight but I don’t know if that applied to all versions
I know a guy that was involved with the Concorde tests and he confirmed to me some years ago that the reports were essentially true. The Lightning was generally a very hot ship as stated, but sadly they had various other inadequacies. They were very much a machine of their age and cannot really be compared to modern stuff except for those wonderful climb, max altitude, and acceleration numbers :diablo:
Could the elevator thing be to accomodate the Hawkeye ? I presume that it has a bigger footprint and hence needs a larger elevator………..
I understand that the ADV is a couple of metres longer than the other version. Why is that ?
“It consists of two gas turbines, four electric propulsion engines, four diesel alternators and two propellers”
I know little about ship propulsion systems so is having only two propellers in any way controversial ? Seems to my dull mind that if one was unavailable, that steaming at a sensible speed for French flying operations might be difficult, or do I misunderstand how this works ? :confused:
What do other conventional carriers have ?
At what stage is the F136 ? Is it running ? It it at the stage where Rolls GE could consider continuing development on their own for other airframes ?
I would imagine that the pilot would have lots to concentrate on if this happens. Predicting the stall speed and hence minimum approach speed would be tricky, particularly if you were approaching a carrier 😮
Dauntless is launched today 😎 No doubt it will be on the local news.:rolleyes:
Yesterdays telegraph on this specific issue. I have included it here as it briefly includes reference to Naval stuff and the carriers.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/01/22/ndefence22.xml
Presumably due to the size of the ships and the higher safety margin for flying in worse conditions generally with a STOVL Carrier, the RN are not going to fit stabilisers in the first version of the ships as they may percieve that they don’t need them. Could they actually have declared via the back door with this decision that they will be building STOVL carriers or have they formally declared that previously elsewhere ?
If they were fitted FOR them but not installed, then presumably they could be fitted subsequently at a major refit or if/when the ship is converted to CTOL in the future with the next generation of aircraft beyond the F35 ? Would that make sense ?
Tango, thanks for the update 😎
Perhaps they are turning the RFA’s into a shadow navy to make up for the other one that is disappearing :diablo: 😮 Hidden capability etc 😉
Not using their military is hardly something that the Aussies can be accused of. They seem to rapidly becoming one of the worlds few Policemen, like the US, France, Holland, UK, Canada………………….etc. Agreed though there are a good few countries that are somewhat over-equiped for the roll that they play.
They didn’t hang about did they ?
Don’t read todays daily Telegraph 😡 😡 😡 😡 😡 🙁 🙁 🙁 🙁 🙁 🙁 😮 😮 😮 😮