Turbinia, Interested in your comments as always. Assuming a container or container RoRo is the prefered option, how do they hanger any aircraft if they don’t have lifts ? Is it a case of fabricating a ramp and winching aircraft up and down it to the lower levels or is everything done on the very top level ?
Maybe if someone could post a cutaway image of the internals of a ship like this I might be able to visualise it better.
It is because of questions like this that DASA produce the statistics attached for the UK MOD every year. No doubt at a more detailed level than the summary statistics shown they could exactly answer your question as to which ships would be suitable, because someone does think about things like this;
http://www.dasa.mod.uk/natstats/ukds/2006/c3/table36.html
I know for example that some tankers can be converted to fuel supply ships after a very short period in a yard. It was done in 2-3 weeks to some BP tankers in 1982. And from that time we all know the sad story of Atlantic conveyor and its cargo of Chinooks & Wessex that would have been flown off had they got a chance…..
What is interesting in those statistics is the reduction in UK Registered passenger carrying ships which might be percieved as a risk in some parts of the MOD.
As far as I am aware and for reasons unknown they don’t publish this data for militarily useful commercial transport aircraft, which I would have thought was an equally important statistic. :confused:
At the speed nuclear capability is apparently proliferating, there will be several more states that hold the potential to creat these weapons by the time the subs enter service. You can depend they won’t all be friendly ones so the argument that the risks may be less is somewhat questionable
Well todays the day. I just hope they don’t propose going to less than 4 subs but rumours suggest they might 🙁
Might they be tempted to fit any future ICBM Vanguard replacement with non nuke tactical cruise missiles as well, or would that dilute a focused design ? Do the Americans carry both types of missiles in theirs ?
I must get up to speed on this as I am shamefully out of touch on Subs.
Whats the betting that one option will be so cheap that it will be strategicly hopeless ? :diablo: No doubt that will be the preferred option :dev2:
I thought the USA provided virtually all of the Iceland defence system ? Have they taken a step back from this ?
Intersting quote on the radio this morning that Al Yamamah is the Biggest contract that the Brits have with anyone for anything so that is why they view it as being so important
Its front page news in todays Financial Times in the UK, doesn’t make particularly happy reading 🙁
Can’t do a web link as its a subscription service
Media reports this morning suggest that the Saudi’s have indeed now formally suspended talks on the Eurofighter :confused:
They will be suggesting Harland and Wolff for CVF main assembly next as part of the Northern Ireland Peace Dividend 😉
I think the size difference will be minor. Its quite possible that the UK RN will adapt some of the changes recommended by the French. You will recall someone posted on here a French article recently that implied this was the case. One of those was much more aviation fuel capacity which added something like 3000 tonnes to its displacement.
One area of capability where the CVFUK will have a small advantage is the ability to operate in extremely poor weather conditions where STOVL aircraft have shown an advantage over conventionals carrier vessels. Some of you will recall the incident during the Falklands in in 1982 when Lt Commander Broadwater was forced to eject when his Harrier was blown/slid off the deck in very High winds and seas. Those were supposedly conditions that were two sea states worse than any conventional carrier has operated in.
Crab, Yes UAV’s would certainly be on the agenda
Would there be any advantages of an aircraft like this being swing wing ?
Some buyers may prefer one maker to another, particularly if they already have a happy working relationship with them for their existing aircraft. Its no different to when you buy a car, most manufacturers offer you a choice of more than one, although rarely from a different maker. As a buyer I would always be in favour of a choice.