dark light

Super Nimrod

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 586 through 600 (of 953 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: CVF News #2087158
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    Beedall has updated his excellent site a little and has a new editorial re the latest CVF machinations. I love the comment about the fact that the whole of WW2 took less time than the RN/UK Govt have taken to decide on whether to build the CVF 😮 :diablo:

    http://navy-matters.beedall.com/index.html

    in reply to: Alternatives to the P-8A #2540511
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    Presumably these wings are not of a new design but just same old same old ?

    in reply to: The best SSK till date? #2087230
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    Perhaps the RN will wait and see how the AIP boats shake out and then build their own if the technology proves truly mature with few drawbacks. Can’t really see the money being available at the moment though, with what they have spent on Astute.

    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    Well they ‘only’ have 20 plus vessels to lose if you include the assault ships. As to whether the smaller SSK’s could ever fire off enough conventional torpedoes to sink a Supercarrier before they were scragged by one of the escorts or airwing is a moot point, but they could no doubt seriously disable one. I suspect only the USN knows the answer and that fact that they have had the Gottland on trials for 2 years suggests the threat is pretty real as others have said.

    in reply to: 3 engines question #2541552
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    There are a few 3 engined military helicopters.

    in reply to: Alternatives to the P-8A #2542766
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    Can’t see anyone going Nimrod, and I am not sure if its even being marketed. There may be some spare airframes in Storage (the RAF can’t afford to run as many as it used to) but the costs would be prohibitive as the UK government have found, as 90 odd percent of the aircraft are new. The MR4A has got a new wing that is apparently optimised for that kind of work.
    This version seems to now have a wider role than just maritime.

    in reply to: Swedish Airforce to acquire 2 C-17s? #2542928
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    There have been a few C-17’s in at Stansted in the last couple of years and lots of 124’s. Based on those that I have seen there is no comparison, the C-17 can typically take off and land in a little less space than a 737, the 124’s usually need much more runway. You only have to look at the two aircrafts thrust to weight ratios to see which one will accelerate to take off speed first, there is a 20% plus difference. I would say from what I have seen that typical take off distance is 600-1000m longer for the 124.

    in reply to: The best SSK till date? #2087800
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    Exactly, now we have moved into a different kind of warfare they are probably more use in Littoral ops in support of special forces, although realistically they might just be a bit too large for that, but I think you can construct a case for most of the other SSK’s in use at the moment by various Navies.

    in reply to: Stealth – the next step ? #2543884
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    Guys, Sorry to dig up an old thread and bulldose all the sceptics to one side, but it appears that IT WORKS 😮

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6064620.stm

    Someone in the military presumably will now take this seriously. No doubt it will all go quiet and we won’t hear anything about it for another 7 or 8 years and then some secret aircraft will break cover. :diablo: Well lets just wait and see shall we :rolleyes: 😀

    in reply to: Newest US fighter aircraft makes first flight #2545699
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    Thats the version of the F-35 the Brits are getting. :diablo: Tony Blair forgot to mention to the MOD that he was forced to make a few technical compromises in order to get operational sovereignty 😮 :rolleyes:

    in reply to: The best SSK till date? #2088707
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    Putting aside the lack of AIP, to what extent were the Upholder/ Victoria class a reasonable design ? I notice they have hardly been mentioned yet, but didn’t they have many features found only on the Neuks ?

    How many Navy’s use SSK’s in Blue-water conditions these days, or are most generally confined to coastal duties ? Indeed how many of the SSK’s are designed for genuine blue-water operation a long way from home ?

    in reply to: CVF News #2089071
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    Defence talk today reported that India turned down the last 8 Harrier FA-2’s that the UK government has offered them. I think they should seal them up in an atmospherically controlled shed somewhere on a just in case basis.

    in reply to: RAF Visiting Gwalior, India #2547903
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    Eurofighter will be a far tougher opponent, and as both sides will have had a similar level of experience with each aircraft so would start reasonably equal.

    in reply to: Japanese Aerospace fading giant or reviving monster? #2548009
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    I must admit I am more confident about the future of Japanese aviation now that Honda have made a move into aviation. If anyone will get the Japanese ducks in a straight line in the long term, it will be Honda.

    in reply to: RAF Visiting Gwalior, India #2548016
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    Looks like the Indians are doing their very best on the hospitality front (Thumbs up Smiley)

Viewing 15 posts - 586 through 600 (of 953 total)