I can handle losing the Gazelle, because as stated it does have limited utility. Its the fact that it isn’t being replaced with something that is useful that sticks in the craw
Having worked in both the private and public sectors doing a similar job I know which one I would rather work in. The private sector is vastly more efficient, whereas the public sector sadly has far too many jobs that really don’t need to exist and crap pay as a result with few or no incentives to improve. Admittedly the profit motive for somepeople is not acceptable in the private sector but I view it as a small price to pay for more efficient use of the taxpayers money. Thats why I am not too hung up on the air tanker deal and similar private initiatives as they ‘may’ lead to some financial and tactical efficiency. Where I have my doubts about the private sector is what happens when the bullets start flying………………….
I personally believe that 5 C17’s is not enough. They seem to be constantly working a bit like the 737’s the economy airlines use. The commitments in Afghanistan and Iraq is keeping them very busy. It would not be surprising at all if another is procured or leased soon, to get them over the current busy spell.
The Harrier although considered outclassed by many still has one very useful trick up its sleeve where it can outclass the conventional carrier aircraft. It can be operated in much rougher sea states than even the American super carriers. I was reading last year that during the Falklands war Harriers were occasionally being operated in conditions two sea states worse than any conventional carrier had ever operated in. Admittedly you don’t get bad weather every day but the ability to fly in all but the worst conditions can actually be useful. Presumably the new F-35’s will have a similar ability in poor weather.
Not sure that schematic is accurate. For real the F15 is 22% longer than the eurofighter. In that diagram its just over 30% longer.
Regardless the size difference is striking
Have I missed something, re the last sentance in the original article “Britain has already cut its order and others may follow.” When did Britain ‘cut’ its order, I thought it was still 150 with the type to be confirmed once the British Politicos have got their asses in gear ? :confused: :diablo:
And don’t forget that in the event of any offshore air to air combat the Harriers don’t have a Radar, so will be relying on ships or maybe the AEW Sea Kings for target support which will be like going back 40 years.
The whole situation re funding and the structure of the UK forces stinks and sooner or later the MOD may get itself burned badly on an operation and then the questions will start. The fact that the current Afghan and Iraq deployments are leading to the MOD having to spend $1 billion in additional force protection measures that they hadn’t anticipated, and that is in spite of many year of Northern Ireland experience, implies that there may be something wrong with the management.
The government are intent on remaining a world player politically, yet seem reluctant to back that up with sufficient resources for when things go wrong. Very short sighted
First generation full spectrum stealth ?
I’ll get my coat……..
Ken
You do that Ken 😀 😉
Got us all excited there for a mo………………………… 😉
In the Official history of the Falklands war published last year, it mentions iirc that all the missile systems at that time worked kind of okay in the blue water environment (with some caveats), but as soon as they moved inshore they were all badly compromised by the close proximity of land and the low level tactics the brave Argentine pilots used. Even the much vaunted land based Rapier systems were initially not very effective due to the ‘clutter’ of the surrounding hills and they had to review their tactics fast to make them more useful. Even then they only managed 2 kills despite lots of launches.
Includes some pictures of the man
Older aircraft if they offer a unique capability in your theatre can be spectacular value for money so that is why some types hang on so long
They only made one type 82 as well in the seventies. I am not sure I every really understood why the rest were cancelled, as the Bristol served for many years and is finally about to be scrapped later this year I believe
I suspect the British govt will jump at the chance of delaying funding of some of the Eurofighters; as they announced this week that they are having to spend about $1 billion (that was not budgeted) on force protection measures in Afghanistan and Iraq ! Thats on top of the normal $10 billion procurement budget, so something may have to give somewhere and Eurofighter could be it.
One of the items, among about 20 purchases they announced, was that they are armouring the cockpits of Nimrods, C-130’s and I think C-17’s and finally fitting the fuel tank foam suppressant, which will no doubt please the aircrew.
If he was to fly into Stansted then he could get a train from there direct to Cambridge and miss out the travelling through London bit altogether. No doubt he would have to change planes in Europe somewhere but that would allow him to use the two economy airlines, Easyjet or RyanAir into Stansted which would probably save some money as well.