dark light

Super Nimrod

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 953 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Chinook Bravo November #2398960
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    Is there another currently active aircraft that has seen more action over such a long period ? Time to start building a nice platform to park it on when it retires to Duxford or the IWM in London perhaps ?

    I hope they rivet another plaque inside to commemorate this award.

    in reply to: Battle of Britain BBC2 last night #1135261
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    Although this was of course about the BoB I think a little more should have been made as to how unsuccessful Sea Lion would likely have been anyway even if the Germans had won some degree of air superiority considering that this was supposed to be a more even handed approach to that period..

    Various experts have said over the years that Hitlers Generals hadn’t really thought about it much at all, and in truth they probably needed 20 times the vessels & barges that they had available and they hadn’t considered that they would need many multiples of the different specialist vessels like the allies used on D-day. A lot of the German high command knew this. Logistically they were very naive in their Sealion plans (amazingly they were planning to bring over hundreds of horses in the first few days) compared to the allies a few years later, something which irritated Joe Stalin no end as the allies deferred their landing and a second front until they truly did have the resources and equipment to succeed.

    in reply to: Preservation of Historic Aviation Websites #1139844
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    All sorts of heritage and preservation movements are facing similar problems. One of my favorite railway websites that had thousands of photographs and hundreds of separate pages nearly went the same way when its brilliant webmaster passed away in his mid forties. No one had considered continuity planning then either.

    in reply to: Spitfire Women BB4 21.00 tonight #1139851
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    I thought it was rather a good programme. Its a pity the main players had all passed on as they were certainly made out to be characters.

    in reply to: "First Light" thread #1141520
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    The bit of BoB film where the Spit crashed on the Beach looked very realistic. Was that a real crash or a very clever mock-up with a model ?

    Quite enjoyed the programme really.

    in reply to: CVF Construction #2026867
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    I think you need to do the math again mate. Its massively higher than that based upon the potential reserves projected by the BGS 😮
    The average life of an oil field is about 40 years.

    in reply to: CVF Construction #2026872
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    I think todays excellent news re the Oil find in the Falklands by Rockhopper Exploration may well have assisted the case for the continuation of the CVF program. It appears that we may be seeing the beginnings of a major new Oil province in Falklands waters and todays news won’t have gone unnoticed at the UK treasury given the potential for serious inflow of significant funds for the next 50 odd years. Today might be the day that the story changed for CVF .:D

    in reply to: Alternative British name for the term 'Warbird'? #1145257
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    I am fortunate to still have four close relatives & friends whom served on or with Bombers in WW2, and they still to this day describe them as ‘Kites’ as JohnCooper and Kookaburra suggest.

    It doesn’t really work today as a description, but it is interesting how the vernacular has changed in 60 years.

    in reply to: Ascension/Falkland Tanker Analysis Needed #2409403
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    Mind you if I was planning an attack on the Falklands and with the Typhoon being about the best fighter in the Southern hemisphere I would spend a lot of effort trying to ensure that they never got off the ground to start with. Thats where Jimbobsimmonds scenario might well come into play.

    My response – MRA4 with Stormshadow within a few days (much easier fuelling options) , followed by TacToms once the SSN’s were there.

    in reply to: COGAG vs CODAG vs CODLAG vs IEP? #2028569
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    Yes that would be perfectly possible, indeed that may be the way forward for some vessels such as patrol ships and mine hunters, but that it also could give you the option of adding a battery pack if you so desired. I was speaking to someone a few weeks ago that was saying that such a system would use a variation of railway loco technology (cheaper than a conventional submarine system) and if you wanted to you could use it to charge a large battery pack that you would use for operations that required near silent running. No doubt someone has tried this at some point anyway as its very similar idea to a traditional submarine, just on the surface ?

    in reply to: LGB vs Aircraft Carrier #2028784
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    Its probably fair to say that a couple of 2000lb LGB’s would put any major vessel at risk. You will see from that video how they penetrated the side of the vessel and not at an angle from above that would needed them to go through the deck had it been a carrier.

    As to if they could get through the Carriers and support vessels countermeasures, thats another matter.

    in reply to: CVF Construction #2028799
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    The reality is that it wont be quite as tight as that as the dock has been enlarged by widening it by 9m. See link to Halcrow & BAM Nuttal who are on the project.

    http://www.bamnuttall.co.uk/news/march09/problems_answers.html

    http://www.halcrow.com/Our-projects/Project-details/Rosyth-dockyard-Scotland/

    I understood that the Goliath construction crane was originally due to arrive this month, does anyone know if it has arrived ?

    in reply to: RN to lose 3 amphibs #2029099
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    I hope they don’t scrap Argus. I was very impressed with the facilities when I went on board a couple of weeks ago. Hospital for 100 patients, about 20 emergency beds which looked extremely well equiped, three operating theatres, latest spec CT scanner, several x-ray machines. I believe it also has a lab for blood work etc. It was clear major money had been spent on her recently including an enormous circular ramp that went right through several decks of the ship for wheeling gurneys, plus two large new patient lifts.

    Then you go below the rear deck and there is that enormous split hanger that looks like you could park 10-12 Sea Kings, Merlins or Harriers below. The bays can’t do this role without major expenditure and the hanger would always be smaller and above deck as the through deck lift on those is for small vehicles only and an underdeck hanger would restrict dock space anyway.

    What chance some of these ships will be layed up rather than sold ?

    in reply to: CVF Construction #2029418
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    Also if the aircraft comes in at 50-60 knots the ship will be moving forward at above 20 knots so the relative speed could be as little as 30 knots at touchdown, plus you have to allow for any headwind which could reduce this further.

    in reply to: A400M Flies #2375028
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    H K, agreed 60 A400 for Germany always had the look of Pork Barrels about it to me as well.

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 953 total)