Could the QB-47 actually fly anywhere near 60,000 feet or were they heavily modified ?
The EE Lightning could fly that high many years ago. Did they ever attempt to launch anything from one ?
Sounds like this is becoming more of a reality
Eurofighter :diablo: Stealthy nose panelling and engine intakes and a twin tail in the fashionable more stealthy V formation. It wouldn’t be perfect but it might be better. Consider thrust vectoring, but may not be possible. 😎
There is mileage in what you say swerve and this has been discussed here before and there was a similar suggestion in one of the UK newspapers last year. A bomber derivative of an MR4A would be very cost effective as it would need very little of the MR4A’s technology fit (all those expensive back seaters) and just a larger weapons bay instead. Imagine it ‘might’ even be possible to tote TacToms if configured right :diablo:
They are not exactly short of airframes either. Don’t they have quite a few in storage ?
I understand that Lego now have computer models to help them build the one off display pieces. It would make life easier at the design stage, thats for sure
Anything but Spitfire please. Some names should be sacred. The RAF/RN will probably call it something different to the US anyway if it ever gets in UK service.
Yes, but the 225 is in somewhat limited supply even though it could take 4 :diablo:
In terms of an airframe shortage I am sure the RAF could get a good deal in IL-76M or MF’s even if it was just for short term lease (They wouldn’t take a Chally 2 though) The optics on this wouldn’t be good either :confused:
It does have the look of a split deal to me
One LPH that could act as a back-up support / escort carrier for the F-35 is a very attractive option to the Admirals. I have said on here before that getting ‘hidden capability’ past the bean counters & politicos is something that the MOD is very good at. Any LPH that might come along may not have a ski jump, but you may depend the plans for a temporary one will be sitting on a computer somewhere and of course the lifts from the hanger and the fuelling system would be capable from day one of operating an F-35.
The Ocean was a prime example of how easy it might be. It was a VERY cheap ship (about £300m in todays prices) because it used commercial standards for many things. Its not perfect, being too slow for one thing, but building a slightly larger one would still be possible for 35-40% of the cost of a CVF. Now if the hull were to be built in the far east then an economic option could be found. I am not sure that such a vessel needs a dock though. The RN already has a very good amphibious capability.
ELP I agree with most of what you say above, however the key point for any strategist is that the F-35 will be in service in 40 years, the F-15/16/18 will not. When buying a new aircraft you would be foolish to consider todays or next years threat, its what is down the road in 15-20 years that you have to consider. Tactical upgrades (PGM, Laser JDAM’s etc) are just to enhance current capability. The F-35 however, offers a strategic upgrade and thats a whole different thing for those that pay the bills and send the guys to war……..
:diablo: 😀
Todays news will bring this a whole step closer
Sens, Found it, thanks for the tip off re the news. I have posted a separate thread
Blair and Bush came to an agreement about the F-35 problems. It allows the British to operate the F-35 more independently from LM supervision.
Sens, are you saying that this has been agreed in the last few days ? Please, Where did you hear this ?