dark light

Super Nimrod

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 871 through 885 (of 953 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: F-35 & F-22: Two-seat Advanced trainer version? #2585401
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    Didn’t the RAF say that the new Hawk 128’s will be able to simulate some aspects of both the F-35 and the Eurofighter ? I guess a lot will be done in Sims though as said.

    They won’t be able to do the STOVL bit though with a Hawk 128 😀

    in reply to: F-35A production PICS!! #2585480
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    Have certain bits of the photos been deliberately whited out ? The ‘lump’ on the starboard side of the nosecone near the nosegear and the object dangling underneath look like they may have been deliberately obscured if you blow the photos up to about 4 times screen size :confused: Perhaps they are just bad camera flash reflections ?

    in reply to: Clemenceau coming back home! #2062424
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    Ah, but by that stage most ships are owned by anonymous small time operators flagged out of Liberia or similar, and are not such easy targets for the environmentalists as a nice fat government that is reluctantly forced to demonstrate that it has a conscience.

    in reply to: BAe details even more UCAV/UAV work #2585911
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    How many other stealthy UAV’s are in the public domain, that are actually flying ?

    in reply to: Clemenceau coming back home! #2062552
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    Is it right that they are going to tow her back the long way via the Cape rather than through Suez ? Didn’t she go out via Suez ?

    in reply to: Clemenceau coming back home! #2062904
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    Merlock, There has been a similar row in the UK about us breaking up USN ships. At one point the ships changed direction several times in mid Atlantic as the politicos and environmentalists decided no, then yes, then no, then yes, then no. I lost track of what hapened in the end.

    in reply to: Clemenceau coming back home! #2063005
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    Classic fudge. And I thought only we Brits did such things 😀

    in reply to: Interception of the cruise missile #2588760
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    Presumably even the most basic of ground to air or air to air missiles would have a good chance against a cruise, provided ground clutter didn’t confuse it ? Do they carry any countermeasures ?

    in reply to: Oldest Serving Aircraft #2588804
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    According to this Martin Baker believe Meteor WA638 is the oldest active miltary registered jet still flying. Note its a PDF and takes a while to download

    http://www.martin-baker.com/Acrobat/The_Chalgrove_Meteors.pdf

    in reply to: Oldest Serving Aircraft #2588813
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    .

    in reply to: Oldest Serving Aircraft #2589584
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    Presumably excluding those on strictly ceremonial roles e.g. BoB memorial flight etc

    in reply to: Mercy for old Clemenceau… #2063200
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    Didn’t the USA use the America for controlled target practice over a period of a couple of weeks, to see how it coped with damage, before finally sinking her ?

    Latest re the Clemenceau

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/4708530.stm

    in reply to: Type 45 launch website #2063314
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    Rob, You are probably not too far wrong there. A T45 ‘cut and shut’ version about 10-15 metres shorter as a general service frigate would be a low risk option as would a slightly larger land attack variant with bigger guns and Tomahawk.

    I don’t think we have necesarily seen the last of the River class yet either as these are apparently proving cheap to run (I spoke to the no1 of the one at IFOS in 2005 and he said the RN were ‘delighted’ with their costs) and a Corvette version could be an option with a suitable uplift in weaponry and sensors, although they would always be a compromise in many respects.

    in reply to: Direction of Development and its purpose #2063317
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    Countries like USA, Britain and to a lesser extent France with an amphibious warfare capability definately need AAW defence of that capability against all airbourne threats.

    in reply to: Rafales first customer? #2591550
    Super Nimrod
    Participant

    Algeria has been making pots of cash the last couple of years from Oil & Gas exports(95% of its exports are Hydrocarbons) . Like many small countries they are using such windfalls to purchase the one off capital items that they cannot normally afford to buy from taxation in a more typical year.
    Although not aircraft look how much Chile has spent improving its navy in the last 2-3 years. For them its because of the price of copper they sell which has seen similar improvements to the price to oil.

    The Algerians may well have some cash but as to whether they would buy Rafale, only time will tell.

Viewing 15 posts - 871 through 885 (of 953 total)