I’m not aware of anything where the Typhoon really stands out.

Better acceleration and turning than F-22 especially when in clean A2A mode (no tanks).

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2017/08/15/new-russian-jet-could-faster-launch-missiles-farther-than-u-s-f-22/568787001/

SU-57 faster than F-22 as admitted by US media.

The Russian air force will soon get the first batch of its much-anticipated, supersonic fighter jets, but at least one U.S. expert is not impressed.

United Aircraft Corporation CEO Yuri Slyusar told the Russian news agency Tass that a pre-production batch of about a dozen jets, recently named Su-57s, will be made available to military pilots in advance of final design work. That’s expected to be completed in 2019.

“The plane has got its name like a child after the birth,” Air Force Commander-in-Chief Viktor Bondarev told Rossiya 24 TV Channel. “Pilots will be learning to operate it.”

Bondarev called the Su-57 a “wonderful machine” at an aviation expo last month, and the jet has received an extensive promotional push from Russian state media, Newsweek reported. Richard Aboulafia, vice president of the defense market analysis firm Teal Group, was not buying the hype.

“The Russians really like talking big, but the cash and technology just don’t seem to be there,” Aboulafia told USA TODAY.

Russian state media has reported the Su-57’s maximum speed at 1,600 mph, which would be slightly more than the F-22 Raptor. Newsweek reported the Su-57’s missile range, based on the information available, also exceeds the F-22.

“Every country probably wants planes such as this, and we have them,” Bondarev said of the Su-57.

Aboulafia, however, says Russia must create new technology, particularly engine technology, to meet reach the specifications it is claiming.

“They still need to find the cash to fund the development of the complete version of this aircraft,” he said. “They’ve been trying for quite some time.”

Do not the T-50 and other various Sukhoi have to perform tasks, with a war with China being greater thought than the U.S., have to perform more like the old F-105 & F-106?
Both having long range but one having the ability to exit target area at very high speed and the other the ability to reach targets at a very high speed.

For intercepts, the T-50 within Russia, will always have emergency landing bases or tankers available should reaching bingo fuel be necessary on a mission, while other Sukhoi tactical aircraft can deliver weapons and due to longer range boogey home catching a tanker or emergency base if need be.
With this in mind, high speed whether chasing a target or clearing target area is very , very important.

Exactly and Berkut is foolishly ignoring obvious design features of T-50 that make it much less drag and faster than F-22 in supercruise and max speed. Russia is large with lots of area so T-50 need lot of speed to get to the fight.

I am comparing MiG-31 to Su-27 to get my point across because PAK-DP is not real, yet. You are clearly missing the point. PAK-FA is not, and will never be interceptor. Just like Su-27 will never be able to fill the tasks MiG-31 is doing, get it? There is a reason PAK-DP is a project. Also jesus christ on a stick, 384 m/s is not a real figure. It is 100% BS and even the most basic critical thinking and google would show that to you.

Your video link is pointless. There is nothing happening at 8 min mark of any relevance to the discussion.

PAK-FA will supercruise over Mach 2 just like MiG-31 and can carry large long range missiles like izd 810 so it can take the MiG-31 role. PAK-DP can just use variant of PAK-FA T-50.

UAC DEVELOPS INTERCEPTOR TO REPLACE THE MIG-31

https://www.aviaport.ru/digest/2017/03/17/427901.html

Why need a new interceptor when PAK-FA can do the same thing? Unless they think the new interceptor is a PAK-FA variant.

During testing the aircraft managed to achieve a 384 meters per second climbing rate. According to Russian newspaper Rossiyskaya Gazeta, such a climbing speed would’ve allowed the warplane to reach an altitude equal to the peak of Mount Everest, the highest mountain on Earth, in a mere 23 seconds.

Read more: http://sputniknews.com/russia/20160220/1035076981/russian-stealth-aircraft-new-record.html#ixzz40qlPrbij

I think we have a misunderstanding here actually. I wasn’t thinking of Bondarev quote but rather Mikhaylov quote where he clearly stated the requirement was lowered from M2.15 to M2. What did Bondarev say, exactly?

Bondarev said T-50 will go more than mach 2. T-50 will clearly be faster than F-22 and people in authority like Alexander Zelin have confirmed. It funny how you magicly trust Mikhailov who said crap like T-50 will fly in 2007. F-22 is 20 year old design with outdated materials. T-50 with more powerful engines and sleeker frame should no problem be faster and accelerate better than F-22, theres no reason to doubt that.

https://www.rt.com/news/262657-pakfa-better-us-5g/

Can we stop posting this information as if it was confirmed or true? I asked a spotter that hangs around Zhukovsky a lot whether this information could be true and whether pilots would share this kind of detailed information in radio chatter. This was afterall supposedly information from scanners. He said that no, it is very unlikely they would say something like this in open broadcast for the whole world to hear.

There is no reason T-50 can’t make these speeds. It have very low drag meant for supersonic flight and variable inlets for speed much higher than mach 2 and confirmed by Bondarev. and powerful type 30 engines and new high temperature composites, all of which point to very high speed. Compare shape of T-50 and F-22, the T-50 should have much better speed and acceleration.