dark light

Isengard

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 4 posts - 46 through 49 (of 49 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2250700
    Isengard
    Participant

    You should take that with around 100kg of salt.

    Why so? Sweep angle, variable geometry intakes, and engine thrust of Type 30 suggests cruise speed of Mach 2, which matches that description.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2251214
    Isengard
    Participant

    The intakes should give PAK FA impressive speed performance.

    http://www.paralay.com/pakfa/pakfa.html

    “Так на испытаниях этой весной (2013 год) при полной загрузке топливом и массогабаритными макетами вооружений 4-й борт (054) взлетел с 310 метров, достиг крейсерской скорости 2135 км/ч и максимальной – 2610 км/ч, при этом был еще потенциал по разгону, а так же забрался на 24 300 метров – дальше не пустили”

    “So to test this spring (2013) fully loaded with fuel and weapons weight and size dummies 4th board (054) took off from the 310 meters, reached cruising speed 2135 km / h and the maximum – 2610 km / h, while was more overclocking potential, as well as climbed to 24,300 meters – more is not allowed”

    in reply to: Can the Su-35S outaccelerate the F-15? #2213931
    Isengard
    Participant

    So, if an F-15C were to be fitted with -229 engines, it would outaccelerate the Su-35S? That seems a bit silly, since the clean Su-35S is already a monster at acceleration and will outaccelerate an F-22.

    in reply to: Can the Su-35S outaccelerate the F-15? #2214522
    Isengard
    Participant

    Some acceleration numbers here.

    http://www.knaapo.ru/eng/products/su-35/index.wbp

Viewing 4 posts - 46 through 49 (of 49 total)