Not CAF’s fault?….I sincerely agree with all that Spitfireman and Wingcomandrflap have just said, being a volunteer from pre opening Newquay.
Martin
I was a volunteer until recently – being there at Newquay, well before it opened and how did we find out today? By an email thanking us for all our efforts and giving us the bad news? No, by reading of it on Facebook. Thanks very much indeed.
A lot of us did all that we could to make it survive and although there are ‘plans’ for the future (FB gossip) I am saddened that it has come to this.
Martin
I think that the confusion between Devon and Cornwall with 335 Squadron ATC is that it used to be in Ernesettle, but is now based in halls close to the Tamar Bridge in Saltash. Perhaps the writers looked up their current location as opposed to the Seafire’s original home in Devon. Where 335 are now based, there is no room for anything, let alone an aeroplane!
Cheers,
Martin
I’ve been a volunteer with the CAF at Newquay for almost two years now and know of the Shackleton in the past and the plans for it to end up at CAF, which sadly came to nought. Nothing has been mentioned in the last few weeks as to the organisation trying to acquire the airframe and as far as I know there will be no room for it either on the pan outside the hangar (where the VC10 and 1-11 currently sit) or in the hangar itself at the beginning of the 2015 season.
Martin
If CAF do obtain the airframe it will have to still remain outside as I believe they are leaving the 404 Hangar sometime in the future.
Martin
I have today received the aircraft movements card from the RAF Museum and it states when it was delivered to the Middle East and on which ship, but no mention of the details of the units it served with. What I found before was in the Air Britain Harvard File and their serials publication covering the AJ prefix. Both of these stated 74OTU and 154 Squadron. I presume I have to obtain proof of the units, from another source?
Best wishes,
Martin
Denis,
Thanks for the reply, so much appreciated. There seems to be some kind of mixup – his discharge papers say as above, but a kind gentleman has sent me a link to this website, that shows that he was indeed with the 391st Bomb Group. The plot thickens!
http://projects.militarytimes.com/citations-medals-awards/recipient.php?recipientid=48621
Best wishes,
Martin
And they seem to say that they have failed to find out more but do refer to a similar construction elsewhere – in Ireland, wasn’t it? Perhaps they might have more information. The records of the local authority might shed some light I suppose or old WD records, wherever they might be. Good luck!!
I’ve written to Cornwall Council today and also asked the Defence Infrastructure Organisation too, so hopefully someone somewhere will know more about this building.
Thanks again,
Martin
A very quick Google produced this – page 3 of the pdf.
Thanks Charlie, Now why didn’t I do that. Makes very interesting reading, but still doesn’t say who built it? The plot thickens!
Cheers,
Martin
Tim,
Many thanks for such a quick reply. I emailed the owner of the website and he came back with the information that it is indeed as you say and is an IMA Target Model. Nearly all of them were painted orange and this was the first silver one he’d seen, but then again I will go and have a look in the box to see if it has been repainted! π
For more information on the initial design of the Target, please have a look at:
http://www.jetex.org/archive/jetxfiles/200411.shtml
Thanks again,
Martin
Oh, if youβre with the Classic Air Force get someone with some sort of Radioactive Monitor to check the sights on the vertical height bar. These are frequently a very active and open source of radium.
Anne
Anne,
Many thanks for the quick reply. Nice to know that its pre-war as we thought it was post, inline with everything in the hangar (cept for the DC-3). Will get the sight monitored, as its sitting on the desk opposite me and well in my own interests would like to know how ‘harmful’ it is! π
Best wishes,
Martin
Yikes…….yes had seen that one before, but we want to build something with a lot more detail.
Two friends and myself build accurate models of British built aeroplanes for the simulators and so far have built 22 different Auster models, the Heston Phoenix, both Chrisleas, the SAH-1 and now the Balliol. We always collect as much information as possible – technical manuals and pilots notes, magazines and books and then when we can feedback and suggestions from current or past owners.
We think we have enough material for the Walrus to commence, but were just a little concerned as to the flying characteristics as didn’t and never do want to publish a model that don’t represent the real thing. No point in making something that isn’t like the real aeroplane.
Best wishes,
Martin