dark light

T6flyer

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 481 through 495 (of 922 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Yak 11 paint schemes? #1327935
    T6flyer
    Participant

    Having a soft spot for the Yak-11, I try to buy all that I can and last weekend at the model show at Yeovilton bought for the pricely sum of £1 a Polish publication on the Yak-11. This from what I can remember has Soviet profiles in it.

    Martin

    in reply to: Time For An Auster Thread? #1327940
    T6flyer
    Participant

    And here’s my bundle of joy, Auster J1 G-AJPZ (certainly impresses people telling them I have a plane – as long as I don’t show them a photo of it!)

    Would also like to say thanks to Martin Pengelley (T6flyer) and subsequently everyone else i’ve met or spoke to about Austers, especially Richard Webber, for giving me the chance to fly in (and fly all except the AOP 6) plenty of Austers

    Aw….shucks……how nice. No seriously, its all been fun and the more young people we introduce to our hobbies and interests the better.

    Richard is still away in America and it looks like we’ll be having two more 9s soon. That will make 7 in total!!

    I’m probably wrong here (I normally am) but wasnt G-AJPZ the Auster used by Christopher Draper in his second attempt in 1953 to fly under the Thames bridges?

    Best wishes to all,

    Martin

    in reply to: Geneva Classics 2006 [1.7MB] #542132
    T6flyer
    Participant

    Nice to see the old Haig-Thomas Avenger out and about again!

    Martin

    in reply to: Warbirds in flight sims #1600887
    T6flyer
    Participant

    I know that any AI traffic can be a killer on the old frame rates and perhaps its just the same for all of us. I’m running FS2004 on an 2.8gig Sempron, with 1gig ram and a Radeon 7800GTO card. With traffic set at about 25%, I get frame rates of about 25 and slowing down to about 10-16 with a busy airfield.

    I dont take out the panels, is it worth doing?

    Most of my virtual skies are populated with Mr Ito’s creations and to originate the flightplans I use FSTraffic 2005.

    Hope this helps.

    Martin

    in reply to: Warbirds in flight sims #1606502
    T6flyer
    Participant

    I know that any AI traffic can be a killer on the old frame rates and perhaps its just the same for all of us. I’m running FS2004 on an 2.8gig Sempron, with 1gig ram and a Radeon 7800GTO card. With traffic set at about 25%, I get frame rates of about 25 and slowing down to about 10-16 with a busy airfield.

    I dont take out the panels, is it worth doing?

    Most of my virtual skies are populated with Mr Ito’s creations and to originate the flightplans I use FSTraffic 2005.

    Hope this helps.

    Martin

    in reply to: Aircraft ID needed #1248597
    T6flyer
    Participant

    Too small for a T-28, I go along with it being a T-34.

    In ’98 on a trip to the States, I was lucky enough to fly in both types, but cant remember that much about the 34. I knew I had to climb up the side of the T-28, for its such a big beast. It doesnt help matters when you’re scared of heights!

    Martin

    in reply to: AT-6 Texan/Harvard ID #1250327
    T6flyer
    Participant

    Looking at the exhaust and the canopy (together with the rear mast) I’d say it was a MK.IIB. I’ve seen other photos (cant remember where) showing IIBs in South Korean colours.

    But as to identities I know nothing……..

    Martin

    in reply to: What do you collect? #1255109
    T6flyer
    Participant

    Suppose my identity gives it away…..anything Harvard…….gave my Dad some lovely Mk.IIB cloches for his garden a few years ago!!

    Martin

    in reply to: Piper Super Cub G-CUBP #1255462
    T6flyer
    Participant

    Thanks Tim for your help. Sounds very interesting to say the least. SO…..the current airframe is then built from the old frame (18-8482) of G-BVMI? (My brain hurts trying to work it all out:)).

    I did have the same problem a few years ago when trying to work out the history of G-AYPO, a L-18C which was rebuilt using the frame of another L-18C when the original was too damaged to rebuild. THEN…..a few years later the original frame was incorporated into another UK based Cub!

    Think I’ll stick to Harvard histories!

    Again thanks very much.

    Best wishes,

    Martin

    in reply to: Warbirds in flight sims #1601286
    T6flyer
    Participant

    Thanks so much for the HU. Will go and have a look. Be nice to have something on the sim, that I’ve flown in 🙂

    Martin

    in reply to: Warbirds in flight sims #1606872
    T6flyer
    Participant

    Thanks so much for the HU. Will go and have a look. Be nice to have something on the sim, that I’ve flown in 🙂

    Martin

    in reply to: Dakota G-AMSV #1272893
    T6flyer
    Participant

    Thanks gentlemen for your input. I’ll keep everyone up to date if anything else emerges from rumour control (South West) Branch!

    Best wishes,

    Martin

    Useless fact – SV was the first Dakota I flew in 🙂

    in reply to: TrackIR 4:PRO ? #224801
    T6flyer
    Participant

    I’ve mentioned it before, but never got around to buying one. I know I wont regret it, but I’ve been doing too much of the real thing recently to warrant purchasing it.

    What with the nights drawing in now, I know it wont be long. I’ve never ever seen a bad review of it. It has to be a must have.

    Best wishes,

    Martin

    in reply to: Very inaccurate model! #228679
    T6flyer
    Participant

    Surprise, suprise I havent heard a thing from Revell. Will have to send a letter now. I’m not going to let them get away with it! 🙂

    One of the modelling magazines is also taking up the subject.

    Martin

    in reply to: Royal Navy Historic Flight website update 14 Sept 06 #1279693
    T6flyer
    Participant

    Here, here (or it that hear hear). Whatever, I really did enjoy myself and look forward to next year.

    Martin

Viewing 15 posts - 481 through 495 (of 922 total)