dark light

wrightwing

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 3,666 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: New F-22 thread #2327717
    wrightwing
    Participant

    Yeah, other countries don’t upgrade their aircraft do they…

    To be quite honest, I’m not sure what there is to be worried about…

    I’m sure they will, but to compare those aircraft with a mature platform, when they’re still behind in many of the technologies, is perhaps overstating things. I have no doubt they’ll be significantly greater threats than 4th gen aircraft.

    in reply to: New F-22 thread #2327732
    wrightwing
    Participant

    I remember a few years ago, LM and the USAF too, I think (and fan-boys) said something like; “There will be ‘nothing’ that will match the F-22 in next few decades”…(I believe they mean’t as long as the F-22 is in service).

    Well…

    Just saying, just saying…

    Or the second option- they don’t think the competitors will match the F-22, which will be benefitting from technological upgrades, while the others are busy trying to match the initial Block capabilites- just sayin.

    in reply to: New F-22 thread #2327738
    wrightwing
    Participant

    F-35 sensors have been tested on other aircraft(and F-35s have been flying with production representative engines, and not a temporary solution till the real engines are ready), and LM had the benefit of having built the F-22. There’s also a huge assumption that neither the Russian nor Chinese aircraft will require any redesigns whatsoever.

    in reply to: New F-22 thread #2327852
    wrightwing
    Participant

    Half the effort and resources eh? I guess with all of the previous examples of that being the case, it’s pretty much a given huh. How hard could it be to develop a 5th gen aircraft, and the engines/avionics on the first try, and…..faster than folks with experience. Of course considering their other late model aircraft benefited from considerable Israeli help(J10), or Russian intellectual property(J11- which I seem to recall some quality control issues having been discovered). They still yet to demonstrate the ability to make a proper 4th gen engine, of comparable, thrust, reliability, etc.. to Russian engines much less Western ones. I’m also curious to see them make major avionics/sensor fusion advances in these time frames.

    in reply to: Air War over Iran – Part 2 #2327890
    wrightwing
    Participant

    Well, exactly i wasn’t behind ECM aircraft flying abowe and near Serbia completely scanning and jaming anything and everything Serbia had, so i can’t answer that. But don’t tell me F-117s were flying blind as Serbian Mig-29s Yet both got shot down. Thats the point.

    In any case, SAM is a SAM weather you are in 1975, 2000, or 2011. It will see you and hit you. Its been proven over and over. Specially if you are a loaded non stealthy aircraft.

    I think its ignorant to count on easily disabling even older SAM system that is wide and numerous, in one-two punch that includes bombing hardened targets.

    Iran has confirmed 29 Tor-M1s and they will be watching to shoot anything they can. Also, unlike S-200s, Tor-M1s will hardly be easy targets as they are small and fast moving!

    First of all, there was only one F-117 that was shot down, and yes, it was as blind as the Migs(no ECM, RWR, MLD/MAWS).
    Secondly, I already pointed to a recent example of non-stealthy Israeli planes flying into Syria undetected, and unopposed by SAMs.
    Thirdly, 29 TOR M1s is hardly an inpenetrable gauntlet, and they aren’t the targets in any event.

    in reply to: New F-22 thread #2327895
    wrightwing
    Participant

    My point is that there are currently production representative F-35s flying, and double digit airframes available for testing, and we’re still looking at 5-8yrs till IOC. There’s maybe 2 each of the PAK FA/J-20 prototypes(which haven’t even flown yet), neither of which are production representative. I just have difficulty in believing that they’ll reach IOC at the same time, unless they have very rudimentary avionics, and absolutely no issues that have to be reengineered.

    in reply to: New F-22 thread #2328015
    wrightwing
    Participant

    The PAK-FA and J-20 will enter service in a similar time-scale to the F-35. Both are limited to A2A for good reason and it is much easer to do so without restrictions in size and related operational cost. From 2020 we will see the first useful A2G variants from that in a much more limited number. Neither Russia nor China will replace their present fighter inventory with a similar number of expensive 5th generation fighters. 😉

    Only if they have significantly fewer test points to validate the aircraft for serial production. Neither the Russians nor the Chinese have production representative aircraft flying, much less the number of test aircraft of any variant. This also assume that neither of their aircraft have any issues in testing, which shift the IOC to the right.

    in reply to: Chinese J-XX/14/20 p.2 #2328039
    wrightwing
    Participant

    The Raptor is old, is a old design based on old technology and old tolerances

    The Russians and Chinese(and Western Europe) have yet to demonstrate a manned fighter with the production tolerances on the F-22.

    in reply to: Chinese J-XX/14/20 p.2 #2328041
    wrightwing
    Participant

    Let`s just be fair and admit guys that Chinese proved that they certainly can do it at the same level as Russians maybe even better. It’s my two cent worth opinion that sometimes it happens that a student can carry on and take over just where the teacher leaves off.

    We know very little about the PAK FA, and almost nothing about the J-20. It’s way too early to come to any conclusions about how they compare to one another(or the F-22/F-35).

    in reply to: Air War over Iran – Part 2 #2328175
    wrightwing
    Participant

    agree 100%

    Now, you need to shot those systems out, or at least disable them so 1-2 strike mission can get through with all the weapons, right?

    How exactly would Israel do this with a modest fleet and quick secret strike. I believe crossing over and accomplishing all those tasks requires 1999 Serbia category mission scaled down only time wise to 1-2 waves. Even so, i wouldn’t advise it.

    For effective deep penetration strike on 4-8 locations inside Iran with 1 to 2 wave punch during single day, They need at least 50 planes, in two waves 50 Each. Or a massive ~100 planes armada for a single surprise attack.

    considering none are stealthy, There would be many at least a 10 shot down. Not to mention retaliatory direct, and “asymmetric” strike by Iran.

    If what i said above is true, would this be good enough for Israel to try?

    How many non-stealthy Israeli planes were shot down over Syria? If Iran doesn’t want an assymetrical response from Israel, I suspect you wouldn’t see hundreds of TBMs fired. I just don’t think it’s likely to see an all out response, to a limited strike, as the risks are too high for all parties.

    in reply to: Air War over Iran – Part 2 #2328284
    wrightwing
    Participant

    yes but at low level they have Tor-M1 systems, and plenty of them.
    If SA-2s and SA-6, SA-3s could down western aircraft in 1999, why S-200 would be any less dangerous! believe it was SA-3 system that saw and hit F-117 despite all the countermeasures.

    Which countermeasures would those be exactly? The F-117 never knew it was under attack, until it was too late. How many Tor M1s does Iran have? How dense is the protective umbrella?

    in reply to: "Super Hornet better than Harrier, Tornado and Typhoon" #2328300
    wrightwing
    Participant

    You don’t think it’s realistic for the USN to have 240 F-35s spread across 10 carriers? There hasn’t been talks about cuts of that magnitude. I don’t think there’d be enough votes in Congress, even among fiscal hawks, to gut defense spending by that amount.

    in reply to: New F-22 thread #2328405
    wrightwing
    Participant

    Maybe you should continue reading, because there is a good point there aside from premature comparison of the two birds. People who fly F-22, or order F-22s to fly war mission will never be in a fight on a home field.

    That fact, in addition with being outnumbered by J-20s alone, and 500 Generation 4 aircraft over China by 2020 is the point of the article IMO. Not one on one dog fight.

    I doubt the J-20 will reach IOC by 2020, much less be available in greater numbers, than F-22s(which by the way will be 185, not 18). There will also be several hundred F-35s in service by then, as well as ~500 Super Hornets/~114 Growlers, as well as hundreds of AESA equipped F-15C/Es, and likely some upgraded Block 50/52 F-16s too.

    in reply to: "Super Hornet better than Harrier, Tornado and Typhoon" #2328426
    wrightwing
    Participant

    The program did shift, but not as a result of issues the C model was having to overcome. This is why the likelihood of Super Hornet buys being anything more than augmentation vs an alternative isn’t realistic. If we start seeing issues with C models, then it might be worthwhile to discuss, but so far all I hear are solutions in search of a problem.

    in reply to: BVR : RF missiles vs ECM #1799071
    wrightwing
    Participant

    That’s highly speculative on the first 2 counts.

Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 3,666 total)