dark light

Robbiesmurf

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 473 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: A Spitfire question. How many… #808973
    Robbiesmurf
    Participant

    Hi Tony, yes, reference your post (#2).
    We did have an ADD system then (Acceptable Deferred Defect).
    I was servicing the Victors during the Falklands & they were coming in with 13 pages full and leaving with 11…

    in reply to: Boeing, Airbus & Bombardier #472437
    Robbiesmurf
    Participant

    Well Boeing has been known to moan about ‘unlawful tax breaks’ that competitors ‘get’. The fact that some of their own Government orders were on the strength of a nod and a wink is by the by.

    in reply to: Wessex for sale. #822138
    Robbiesmurf
    Participant

    Well, if you can’t fly the Walter, you could use it as a snow blower..

    in reply to: Specific to type tools #838410
    Robbiesmurf
    Participant

    I don’t know about the ’40’s but later type specific engine tools were in section 63. If I remember correctly RR Conway tools (Victor K2) were 63AE.

    in reply to: For interest of Ex-RAF Firemen. #839375
    Robbiesmurf
    Participant

    Looks very nice.
    A couple of photos of XL232 should look good as well.

    in reply to: A-W Meteor NF.14 WS788 Restoration Thread #772812
    Robbiesmurf
    Participant

    For the trolley acc, have you tried a local commercial vehicle workshop? They might have some reasonable acc’s available.

    Robbiesmurf
    Participant

    Frankenplane?

    in reply to: Victor XL231 And Nimrod XV250 Work Diary MkII #809990
    Robbiesmurf
    Participant

    Fibreglass on the oil cooler intakes. Was that there already?

    in reply to: WARNING To all Meteor owners. #822137
    Robbiesmurf
    Participant

    Being as they are displayed outdoors I wonder how often water ingress in the joint freezes over the years. Water expands when it freezes and can cause internal stress loading.

    in reply to: Not all Meteors were jets! #822558
    Robbiesmurf
    Participant

    I cannot find any photos anymore. I can tell you it landed with the u/c up because I saw it happen. I was outside walking the wings of a Lightning just out of storage and saw it skidding down the runway. The pilot departed in a great hurry, he also left the Station that way..
    It was lifted and the u/c was dropped then towed into our hangar (ASF) where it was repaired. The ventral and a wing tip had the most damage. XR752 was the first production F6 built, first as the interim (F3a) then later fully modded to F6.

    in reply to: Not all Meteors were jets! #822980
    Robbiesmurf
    Participant

    And yet it happened.
    XR752.

    in reply to: Not all Meteors were jets! #823332
    Robbiesmurf
    Participant

    I’ve seen a couple of types land with no u/c. Lightning, Jaguar..

    in reply to: Not all Meteors were jets! #823723
    Robbiesmurf
    Participant

    A total of 3 Meteors were used by RR for reheat development starting in 1947 to about 1953

    in reply to: Pub Question #12 – Can Tthe EE Lightning… #837851
    Robbiesmurf
    Participant

    XS422 is on the way?

    in reply to: Pub Question #12 – Can Tthe EE Lightning… #837902
    Robbiesmurf
    Participant

    Because the engines had been upgraded with a higher mass flow, the intake couldn’t allow enough air into the engines in a static state. They therefore limited the engine speed and full reheat until it reached Mn 1.4.
    As I pointed out, the mass air flow sea-level static state (SLS) was 150lbs per second through the 200’s and 170lbs per second through the 300’s. That was of course, data measured on the thrust rigs at RR.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 473 total)