dark light

Robbiesmurf

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 436 through 450 (of 473 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: BCWM's Jaguar GR.1 Roll-Out #898096
    Robbiesmurf
    Participant

    Good luck with those tanks Al. Phenolic composites do become porous after a few years being dry. I have had enough experience of leaky tanks on a/c (Lightnings, Hunters, Buccaneers, Jags & Victors), not all of them phenolic!

    in reply to: Cockpit owners/restorers how to power lighting etc #900746
    Robbiesmurf
    Participant

    Thanks for the replies chaps,typically I have a 25amp 12/24 charger,I’ve not tried it yet however,also I would need to run a cable (approx 30m) to the aircraft from my house,i believe this can cause issues too?
    Best wishes,
    Keith

    Get info from a good electrical shop. They should tell what diameter cable you need. Most professional cable reels will have the power outage in Watts on a sticker.

    in reply to: Aircraft names #902962
    Robbiesmurf
    Participant

    Plus some other fun unofficial names (and not always flattering) for US Aircraft, not likely to be found on official or company PR releases :D:

    old (ole’) shakey- C-124
    BUFF
    SLUFF- A-7
    FRED, C-5
    Sled- SR-71
    Sh*thook
    Spooky/Puff
    All 3 dead
    S*n of a B**** second class
    Lawn Dart
    Viper
    Bone

    Again slightly off track Spooky/puff were gunships AC130/AC47 All 3 dead A3D? Lawn Dart F104? Viper F16? Bone B1. In the RAF we had unofficial names for various a/c. Grimmy=Nimrod Frightning=Lightning
    Bionic Budgie=Harrier Septic Pussy= Jaguar Whistling T*T= Argosy Tin Triangle= Vulcan Flying Flat Iron= Javelin Walter= Wessex. We had a whole raft of names………….

    in reply to: Observer aircrew #903001
    Robbiesmurf
    Participant

    A counter to the dead weight then.

    in reply to: Aircraft names #903303
    Robbiesmurf
    Participant

    Because Brits seem to love fey names for warbirds. “Spitty” and “Tiffy” have always made my teeth hurt. Thank heavens we never had “Fortys.” “Libbies” and “Thundies.”

    So what about the BUFF, Thud and Fat Albert?

    in reply to: Vulcan XH558 Final Season..??? #904239
    Robbiesmurf
    Participant

    Maybe they should base it at Machrihanish, it would fit easily in the Gaydon hangar. It’s a bit of a drive to visit it though……………

    in reply to: Vulcan XH558 Final Season..??? #907864
    Robbiesmurf
    Participant

    Having read all the posts although it is sad, it was inevitable that the display flying would end. FI units and engine cycles being used up slowly but surely. The chance that the manufacturers will support the airframe is nil, the economics are not sustainable.
    Having said that, maybe 558 should go out on it’s last flight with a bang, a QRA take-off with four rapid starts.
    That would be a sight.

    in reply to: Your Favourite Control Column Stick/Yoke/Grip! #847795
    Robbiesmurf
    Participant

    I would say Victor if for no other reason than the emblem normally fitted to it.[ATTACH=CONFIG]236889[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Victor XL231 And Nimrod XV250 Work Diary MkII #856076
    Robbiesmurf
    Participant

    Not only weasels, I have been in most of the tanks 1,3,4,5,6,7,8,12 and the underwings.

    in reply to: Victor XL231 And Nimrod XV250 Work Diary MkII #857538
    Robbiesmurf
    Participant

    XM715 I believe. The Artouste was started mid-air with the scoop closed. That would have been late ’86.

    in reply to: RAF Museum Senior Management Team #859455
    Robbiesmurf
    Participant

    Does look a big poor but that’s as much to go with the general tackiness of the design as much as the location. I think if the RAFM wants to maximise the income from food then they could think outside the box a little and try something beyond a sausage roll.

    Quote funny to think of the RAFs recent efforts in getting more out of their brand and then you see it juxtaposed with a sausage roll!

    A NAAFI wagen with “tea and a sticky (bun)” might be a more realistic choice.

    in reply to: Supermarine Scimitar #875981
    Robbiesmurf
    Participant

    Hi, Dragging out memory cells from over 55 years ago is a challenge.
    Each engine had two large access panels which were removed for an ECU change.
    Interestingly Vickers with much forethought built the engine bays slightly shorter than the ECU, so the ECU was suspended
    on a tilt bar so the rear of the engine was slid in to the bay first then levelled and placed on its mountings.
    Naturally the fact that when the ship was at sea, and moving, made the exercise much more difficult.

    That wasn’t just Vickers.
    The Lightning (3,5 and 6) and the Victor mk2 were also a tight fit.

    in reply to: Sitting in Museum Aircraft #883783
    Robbiesmurf
    Participant

    Just make sure the pins are fitted safe for servicing and the seat is certified free from explosives…………

    in reply to: Air Publication 1641E Wanted #885797
    Robbiesmurf
    Participant

    Can you tell me the title, might ring a bell…

    Vol 2 Aircraft machine gun firing control mechanisms

    in reply to: General Discussion #279266
    Robbiesmurf
    Participant

    Are the Chinese trying to access State secrets on this site?

Viewing 15 posts - 436 through 450 (of 473 total)