Thanks for the info!
The inverted-low stuff is from the 1970s or 80s, I believe. It wasn’t forbidden then.
Very nice Wade!
Try put in a bit more of a hint of motion though. They’re buzzing past the viewer at considerable speed I assume.
Entropy, Belgian Fougas are still the masters of LOW! The size and design of that plane really helps though. I wonder if anybody has photos of Fouga displays flown at similar height, but upside down? I’ve heard this so many times but never seen a pic of it.
Just saw this on a website. Note the shadow!

I stand corrected with regards to the Sukhoi pic! 😮
Pity though the photographer used such a short shutterspeed that all motion is lost. The pic posted by UKsceneryman (http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1027487/L/) is much more impressive 🙂
keep going….
http://www.airliners.net/open.file?id=1025605&size=L&width=1000&height=685&sok=&photo_nr=
Cheers,
Olivier
That’s such an obvious fake. A taxiing plane with the landing gear removed. A 5-minute Photoshop job. What a shame it made it onto that website.
And look at all those comments… what a joke! 😡
Harvards landing on water upside down! How impressive is that! 😀
Try WinAmp maybe?
We supected a S. American sample also!
What criteria did you use to ID it so precisely? We are also interested to know it. Tks
Well to be honest it was a guess. I figured the aircraft was an STM-2. It doesn’t have US Army titles on the bottom of the wings, so it’s likely foreign. The only air forces I know that used the STM-2 were the Dutch and Guatemalan air forces. The wing markings match those of Guatemala.
http://www.aeroflight.co.uk/waf/americas/guatemala/Guatemala-af-RyanSTM2.htm
PS. The six-sided stars are very unusual!!!
Very nice!
The only comment I’d give is that the canopy looks a bit too blue, especially on the Hurricane. But that’s nitpicking really 🙂 Good stuff!
Please see below for Evan Mayerle’s [b]fictional[/b] technical history of the Me 109 TL…
😀
David, I can send you the Po-2 manual in digital format. Just drop me an e-mail.
Alternatively you can download it yourself from here, but the connection is very slow and you’re likely to end up with half a manual:
http://twistairclub.narod.ru/u2/u2.djvu
To view this file you need: http://www.lizardtech.com/download/dl_options.php?page=viewers
(I have two similar manuals for the Yakovlev UT-2, by the way)
I bet your Po-2 will be finished way before mine, as mine’s currently on hold. Too many other projects to do, such as the Corsair, more Mustangs and soon the Fw 190 A-8.
Oleg, if you happen to read this, I am still interested in those Po-2 restoration photos you once promised, as I do like to finish this projects… one day 😉
Many thanks for the interest and comments!! 🙂
The contrails… like Damien said it very much depends on the atmospheric conditions. Sometimes they start a hundred yards behind the plane, sometimes they come right out of the exhaust, as on the attached example. I chose the latter as it was more interesting. Although not mentioned, contrail colours is also a nice one that always provokes discussion 🙂 They can be anywhere between reflective white and pitch black, and lots of colour variations too, all depending on weather and sun angles. Check this photo…
http://skyraider3d.military-meshes.com/reference/contrails_reference_01.jpg
Displaying propellers… a very subjective thing and a never ending discussion on aviation art forums! 😀
For these images I chose for a bit of a photographic look. Being an airshow photographer myself, this is what I’m familiar with. But on future artwork I will experiment with “bent” props as seen on some wartime photos as well as full-circle props that, apart from the yellow circle, are nearly invisible.
RobAnt, I am not sure what you mean about the two-dimensional thing. My artwork is three dimentional to start with 😉 I build a virtual scale model replica of the aircraft in 3D CAD software and then use that to make the images.
Thanks Marty!
After I’m done with my Corsair, I will do the Fw 190 A-6/7/8/9 series. Maybe a Dora in the future but not currently planned.
Guatemalan air force Ryan STM-2?
Thanks very much Davski and Paul! I’ll give a shout as soon as they’re available.
Thanks Davski. I agree about the poor legibility and have undone the justifying of the text. It’s centered again and additionally I have decreased the spacing to improve legibility further.
Frutiger is a commercial font which I don’t have. Personally I’m not too keen on it either. It’s a bit too plain to my taste.
The font I use is BankGothic. I always liked it (using it on my website too) and today I noticed was used on some 359th FG reunion material too, funnily enough. I guess I’ll stick with it. In the end I got more people commenting how much they liked and only very few wished for something else. This whole thing could keep me busy for months, but in the end it’s the artwork that counts 🙂
So here are the latest incarnations of the prints.


And a vertical one. Unfortunately the print format is fixed, as I would’ve liked more space at the bottom.


I’ve made some final tweaks. I’ve also filled out the text as a block, so it looks a bit neater. Do you think this looks better or worse?


I haven’t found a more pleasing looking font yet. If you have any font suggestions, I’m keen to hear them 🙂
Thanks for the support!