dark light

Rich Woods

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 91 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Rich Woods
    Participant

    I’ve got this video and the cover is nothing like the one at the top of the page. It’s one of my favourite videos, but it guts me to see that one burn at the end for fire practice.

    Regards

    Richard W

    in reply to: LINCOLN TO AUSTRALIA #1279643
    Rich Woods
    Participant

    First of all, well done on finally getting this old girl to a point where she may be given a little love and attention:- even if it is half a world away from me. I went looking for her when she was near Doncaster, only to be told it had departed. On hearing the general location it was heading to I originally thought it might have been to do with the Dambusters remake.

    Anyway, my view is that the identity of the aircraft should remain RF342. I realise you say this would depend on securing the cockpit section, but I would imagine this went missing years ago, as when she was used by Cranfield she was fitted with a Lancaster nose section anyway!!! I know the cockpit section (Lancaster) that was with her still exists.

    In this way you could rebuild RF342 to B.30 spec… but it would never pretend to be something it isn’t, by wearing a serial number never assigned to her.

    Best Regards,

    Richard W

    Rich Woods
    Participant

    I’m still giving it my all with Lancaster NF920 Easy Elsie. The red tape I’m hitting lately makes the last few years look easy.

    The problem is when you bring an old aircraft to peoples attention, everyone wants a piece of you. Just look at the mess over Swamp Ghost.

    Still, if they think I’m just going to leave them alone because they can shout a bit, theyre sadly mistaken.

    Regards,
    Richard

    in reply to: A Bomber For Coventry #1390395
    Rich Woods
    Participant

    That’d be tellin…

    in reply to: A Bomber For Coventry #1393877
    Rich Woods
    Participant

    Sent a letter to MAM regarding Lancaster NF920 some time back (which was an A.W built Lanc) and never got a reply to the letter.

    Some people elsewhere though, have answered, so I’ve now got my hands full.

    Rich

    in reply to: Nicosia Shackleton #1336775
    Rich Woods
    Participant

    I’ve got a mate who was out there, and he’s got a photo of it. A couple of other guys in my unit have some too. I’ll ask around.

    Richard W

    Rich Woods
    Participant

    That’s one pretty Lancaster… saw pictures of her years ago in Flypast.

    It would almost be a shame to repaint and polish it, as she wears her years well. If the equipment and instruments were put back, and the restoration done sympathetically, it would look like she’d just been parked there overnight.

    Regards
    Richard

    in reply to: Aircraft Cockpit Sections/Instrument Panel Projects #1352610
    Rich Woods
    Participant

    Not yet. Christmas and new year cleaned out my bank balance rather more efficiently than expected.

    Cheers for the address.

    Richard

    in reply to: Aircraft Cockpit Sections/Instrument Panel Projects #1357509
    Rich Woods
    Participant

    Cheers Peter.

    Dave T, Thanks for the pics, they have arrived, I’ll keep you posted.

    Regards
    Richard

    in reply to: Aircraft Cockpit Sections/Instrument Panel Projects #1357522
    Rich Woods
    Participant

    Or, how long would a full airframe be safe to work on and around, especially seeing as most of us wouldn’t be able to store a fulll airframe indoors.

    The Lightning at Balderton and the Vulcan at Blackpool are prime examples. It would only be a mattter of time before health and safety rules were applied by the local authorities and the aircraft would once again be heading for the scrapman.

    Richard

    in reply to: Aircraft Cockpit Sections/Instrument Panel Projects #1357531
    Rich Woods
    Participant

    Dave T,

    I would welcome more pictures. The more I can get the better. I’m going to go and see if I can have a look at it in the flesh some time in January (fingers crossed). I don’t suppose you know how receptive to visitors they are down there do you?

    Cheers
    Richard

    ps: in case you need it my e-mail is,
    [email]biggles2000_99@yahoo.com[/email]

    in reply to: Aircraft Cockpit Sections/Instrument Panel Projects #1357539
    Rich Woods
    Participant

    Cheers!!! They’ve not got me yet!

    Richard

    in reply to: Aircraft Cockpit Sections/Instrument Panel Projects #1357565
    Rich Woods
    Participant

    I’m only young. I have BIG ideas. It’s not a valid excuse. We don’t have the luxury of time just because we are young, we just have slightly more than the older wiser members. It also means that we are going to have less real world experience than them in this subject, so it might be worth listening for once, because we’ll screw up a lot more. I for one have no worries about asking these guys for help.

    My current project began in 1999 and its not back in the UK yet. I have a few realistic targets for the next few years, which I only shout about occasionally, and which take up most of my free time.

    I AM considering that Shack nose section. I know it is gutted and most of the bits went into the Shack on display at St Mawgan, and that it has skin damage around the radome area at least.

    I have investigated costs of transportation, from St Austell to Chesterfield. Storage. Making a custom trailer so I can move it later in its future.

    But, it is a Shackleton, it is worth saving, and its construction is very similar to its predecessor the Lancaster. A nose section will help me build on the neccessary skills I need to use on a full airframe.

    But this is the last you are going to hear of it unless the plan works. The reason being I don’t want to look like a right pillock, and cause everybody not to take me serious next time I try something.

    Regards
    Richard

    in reply to: COULD THIS LIGHTNING BE SAVED ? #1366567
    Rich Woods
    Participant

    728 now sits behind a security fence to protect the site, and her from vandals. I went to see her a couple of months ago, and she’s hanging on (just!).

    When I first went to see her the glass in the cockpit was intact bar the panel on top, so being a skinny so and so I threw my bag in and sat in the cockpit. With the nose pointing skywards and wind causing her to shake it didn’t take too much imagination to think what it must have been like.

    Richard W

    in reply to: Aircraft Cockpit Sections/Instrument Panel Projects #1369026
    Rich Woods
    Participant

    Might have to trade up after I get rid of my car… tis awfully tempting.

    Wonder if I can get it as a late Xmas present?

    Cheers
    Richard

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 91 total)