dark light

LERX

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 224 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: RAF intercept 8 Russian Bears! #2514460
    LERX
    Participant

    Interesting observations butchos.

    Do you think the MoD would consider increasing QRA capacity in light of the recent 8-Bear sortie?

    As you have hinted at, a 9/11 scenario could require more than 4 fighters to be scrambled at short notice & investigate multiple bogies.

    I hope this recent increased Russian activity will lead to increased TAG/NATO air-defence resources, even though I agree there has been no real military threat thus far.

    Hope for the best, prepare for the worst…..

    in reply to: RAF intercept 8 Russian Bears! #2514898
    LERX
    Participant

    Blimey.

    I think the RAF’s Typhoon purchase is pretty safe now!

    How many aircraft are on QRA in the UK (or is that classified?) ?

    What would happen if Russia sent more than 8, as suggested above? Does the RAf have aircraft at staggered levels of alert e.g. 5min, 10 min 15 minutes readiness etc?

    BBC reported a RAF E-3D AWACs was also launched to keep an eye on the intercept.
    Also, Norway launched fighters to intercept these Bears as they passed by Scandinavia.

    Getting that sense of deja vu anyone?.

    in reply to: A modern CTOL carrier under 30,000 tons? #2048967
    LERX
    Participant

    Did you notice my posts on the first thread of the page?

    Apparently not?

    Chill, dude.

    This is all hypothetical.

    in reply to: A modern CTOL carrier under 30,000 tons? #2048999
    LERX
    Participant

    This is a very interesting thread.

    Bearing in mind it is hypothetical….

    Naval Hawk
    I do not see why the Hawk/Goshawk could be made into a viable lightweight carrier strike fighter.
    Beginning with the Hawk 128, redesign:
    -the fuselage with much greater use of composites to save weight
    -uprate the engine, or indeed find a more powerful replacement
    -use strengthened landing gear from T-45 Goshawk
    -add the arrester hook from the T-45

    Naval Super Tucano
    In a low-threat environment, this is not an unreasonable suggestion. I don’t think this 30,000 tonne CTOL aircraft carrier is going to be used to neutralise the Iranian nuclear infrastructure 😉

    Such an aircraft would just need to be armed with IR AAMs for self-protection, free-flight rockets against surface targets & possibly Hellfire, or other AGM

    F/A-18C/D Hornet
    Understandably, people have mentioned the Super Hornet, but this aircraft is large & heavy.
    What about the smaller F/A-18C/D might be more suitable for a smaller carrier & is obviously already carrier-capable.
    It’s not cutting-edge anymore, but people have been talking about A-4s…..

    If such a hypothetical 30,000 tonne CTOL carrier was ever built, I would envidage a air group of

    8 F/A-18C OR 12 Naval Hawk
    12 Super Tucano
    6 AH-1W SuperCobra/6 A-129A Mangusta international
    4 NH-90 ASW
    2 NH-90 SAR/utility
    several UAVs

    A carrier so equipped could be used in low-threat environments & used for anti-piracy/anti-smuggling/sea-control/ASW/naval embargo operations.

    The 30,000t limit for a CTOL carrier is severe, but it’s an interesting concept!

    At the end of the day I think Scooter is right –

    the only reasonable choice is a larger ship or a STOVL aircraft like the Harrier or Lightning.

    in reply to: Japan rolls out the CX and the PX #2516395
    LERX
    Participant

    I wonder if the P-X could be stretched & made into:

    1. a regional airliner
    2. an ELINT/recce platform
    3. a future AEW/AWACS platform

    Since the resources have been expended dsigning the airframe, why not pursue other avenues of growth?

    in reply to: Nationality ID please! #2516401
    LERX
    Participant

    Actually, just seen the expanded image. doh!

    Too few aerials for a “real” RC-12 guardrail aircraft. A good look-a-like.

    in reply to: Nationality ID please! #2516404
    LERX
    Participant

    That looks like a RC-12 Guardrail SIGINT aircraft.

    They are aerials.

    US Army Air Corps?

    LERX
    Participant

    Very nice pics! 😀

    These must be some of the last pics of RAF Jags in “action”.

    Cheers.

    in reply to: HMS Astute Launched #2049351
    LERX
    Participant

    It was tongue in cheek.

    Sorry. :rolleyes:

    in reply to: RAF C17 FLEET EXPANSION #2516751
    LERX
    Participant

    The FSTA PFI might have been a reasonable idea if it had been to provide an additional number of airframes above an outright purchase of A330s. Again, though, if the RAF’s aspiration to get the 24-36 A310 MRTTs that were offered in about 97/98 had been realised (the Treasury said ‘no’) we wouldn’t be having this discussion.

    The key bit here is “the Treasury said no”

    Now who was in charge of the Treasury at that time?

    You guessed it, one Gordon Brown MP

    There is no hope for us 🙁

    in reply to: your country armed forces your way #2516752
    LERX
    Participant

    Croatian Air Force.

    2500x MiG-21-93.

    Why? :confused:

    You’d have to build huge numbers of airbases just to park them. Maybe you could have the world’s first multi-story aircraft park, with lifts!

    😉

    in reply to: HMS Astute Launched #2049359
    LERX
    Participant

    I thought this was a naval aviation forum?

    I guess subs “fly” through the water? :confused:

    Nice pics though….

    in reply to: RAF C17 FLEET EXPANSION #2516822
    LERX
    Participant

    I agree the RAF need more C-17s – eight or more. As well as boosting RAF strategic airlift capacity, further orders would help keep the C-17 production line open.

    I think the RAF should also buy some ex-airline DC-10s/MD-11s & do some cargo/tanker conversions a la KC-10, KDC-10, in addition to the A330 MRTT/FSTA purchase which will take years to arrive.

    The UK can afford to spend more on defence, the present Government chooses not to do so, to the detriment of our military capability.

    in reply to: your country armed forces your way #2517362
    LERX
    Participant

    I’m not Greek, but I would think the Hellenic (Greek) Air Force could do with more fire-fighting aircraft…..

    Canadair CL-415?

    etc.

    in reply to: Soviet aircraft carrier pr. 1153 (shipbucket) #2049633
    LERX
    Participant

    Thanks for the link!

    Navalised MiG-23s – that would have been “cool”! 😀

    I doubt they would have been a match for F-14s though.

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 224 total)