dark light

LERX

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 224 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Price-fixing allegedly by Virgin and Cathay Pacific #560037
    LERX
    Participant

    Oooops.

    Interesting competition law: if 2 parties engage in anti-competitive behaviour, the party which blows the whistle first gains immunity.

    Summary: Virgin got shafted?

    (no pun intended) 😀

    in reply to: Engine cover falls from JetBlue A320 in flight #571709
    LERX
    Participant

    It is an interesting issue the crops up time and time again

    Interesting? Sounds rather alarming to me!

    Are there no safety implications of this kind of incident?

    in reply to: Dead passenger tries to board aircraft #571712
    LERX
    Participant

    Were they trying to board a Scairbus?

    😀

    Sorry, couldn’t resist that one…

    in reply to: Civilian aircraft in military use #2390807
    LERX
    Participant

    Fokker 50 – maritime patrol IIRC (RSAF)

    Boeing 757 transport (RNZAF)

    Dash-8-100 E-9A (USAF)

    I suppose the aircraft used for the controversial “extraordinary rendition flights” would not be included?

    LERX
    Participant

    Active:

    Mitsubishi F-2
    Rafale
    B-1B

    Retired:

    F-14D
    SR-71

    Protoype:

    F-16XL
    YF-23

    in reply to: MiG-19 Farmer #2394598
    LERX
    Participant

    My favourite Mig-19 variant is the Q-5/A-5 Fantan 😀

    in reply to: Red Stars over Lewis #2408227
    LERX
    Participant

    What are the RAF’s RoE in these scenarios?

    If a Tu-160 turned towards the UK mainland and accelerated away from any escorts, apart from being provocative & probably an unwise course of action, are RAF Tornados authorised to use lethal force if UK airspace is penetrated?

    Are the intercepts made with fully armed fighters?

    in reply to: Russian UAC Ilyushin Il-96/Il-98 KC-X Tanker Bid #2420336
    LERX
    Participant

    Blimey! Is this Russian UAC bid really going to go forward?

    I’ve always liked the Il-96 on aesthetic grounds and I find the virtual Airbus/Boeing duopoly of medium/long-haul jets increasingly boring.

    I think it would be good for competition for the UAC Il-96 chaps to join the KC-X party :diablo:

    It would be worth it just to irk US protectionists 😀

    in reply to: Goose strikes force two jets to make unscheduled landings #577408
    LERX
    Participant

    Surely there must be some mistake here?

    Surely you mean Geese strikes?

    😀

    LERX
    Participant

    As far as new aircraft go, I’d agree with proponents of the JF-17 as an affordable Chinese export fighter.

    Not sure what Sino-Serbian relations are like these days…..

    in reply to: Russian air defence gap? #2430330
    LERX
    Participant

    It would be even more interesting to see a UK equivalent…

    The circles would be drawn with dotted lines….. 🙂

    in reply to: How on earth did he not overshoot?? #581105
    LERX
    Participant

    I think those trees on top of that hill beneath the approach could do with a trim….

    😀

    in reply to: Number of fighter types in service at the same time #2431674
    LERX
    Participant

    Like DJ, I was thinking of China PRC:

    Su-30MK
    Su-27SK
    J-11B
    J-10A (J-10B)
    J-8IID/-8IIF
    J-8E
    J-7E/-7G
    JH-7A
    Q-5II

    (source: SinoDefence)

    in reply to: Japan rolls out the CX and the PX #2407961
    LERX
    Participant

    Cooool!

    I await the stretched, 4-engined version with great interest:D

    😉

    in reply to: Air France fat surcharge. #487113
    LERX
    Participant

    Seems fair enough to me. It must cost more to transport a “fat” person than a slim one (fuel costs).

    It is not much fun sitting next to obese passengers, especially when their adipose tissue flops into their neighbours’ seats.
    Not fun at all.

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 224 total)