dark light

plawolf

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,146 through 2,160 (of 4,042 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: chinese maverick? #2690195
    plawolf
    Participant

    PS laser weapons would also be affected by bad weather, but laser weapons are alot cheaper then EO weapons, so maybe they are prefered.

    costs may also come into pay. iran has alot of money and small armed forces, whereas china has much less per capita income and much larger armed forces.

    i suspect all the laser and optic weapons are just a interum solution until sat guided weapons could be developed and feilded.

    in reply to: chinese maverick? #2690204
    plawolf
    Participant

    “The point was that China don’t use EO PGM’s and I also see no developments, they only start to using LGB’s. Iran on the other hand likes EO weapons very much, that’s why I said that the C.701 is an Chinese-Iranian joint project, Iran build its version as the Kosar and China as C.701 for export but as it seems not for own use.”

    could just be the different weather patterns of the different nations. iran has dry and sunny weather most of the time, ideal for OE weapons. whereas china’s east coast is wet and cloudy alot of the time, so the effectiveness of OE weapons would be servierly limited.

    in reply to: Anyone here a fan of military wargaming? #1991914
    plawolf
    Participant

    i love strategy games, but have gotting a little bored with the resource management side. all the currently gen of stragety games, IMHO, doesnt have too much strategy in them at all. its just a fixed system of harvesting/mining etc, and building millions of units and crushing your opponent through sheer size of numbers.

    the real ‘stargety’ is pretty much only how to get your workers/minners working at their peak efficiency. hell, sometimes all you need to do to win is to keep 99% of your attention on your ‘economy’ and building troops at peak efficency and just sending them all off to fight by themselves. only very occasionally do you really NEED to micro-manage the battle. all the games are pretty much just the same but with different units, timelines, stroies and tech trees etc.

    i loved ground control because it got rid of all the mining and building and freed you up to do the fighting. it also required alot more real stragety from you as you only have so many troops, so needed to be more careful with them.

    i am looking forward to the warhammer 4k RST. the reviews sound really promising, and the graphics look great!

    in reply to: Iraqi prisoners 'abused' #1991922
    plawolf
    Participant

    well at least the US authourities were quick to condamn such behaviour and punish the people involved and didnt try to put a spin on it.

    in reply to: Iraqi prisoners 'abused' #1992061
    plawolf
    Participant

    If there’s OONE thing I hate, it’s when someone quotes PART of a message. Why would you ask me that, when I answered that in the second part of the original post?

    This stuff goes on, it always will, and it’s FAR more common that these pictures alone–remember, only the STUPID ones took pictures.

    The mistakes the few make in the military reflects on the entire military, and the military reflects on America. Damn right they better put a stop to this.

    what are you on about? you implied that the reason that those soilders were mistreating the prisioners were because they just caught them with an AK47 after a gun battle. thats plainly wrong. these soilders were prison gaurds who most likely never saw real combat, never mind having just narrowly escaped a bullet fired by one of those captives.

    how did the rest of your post in aby way backed up your claim that those were just soilders venting anger after a firefight? :rolleyes: they must have been pretty angery to have such large grins across their faces. 😡

    in reply to: J-10 MASS Production Starts. #2690534
    plawolf
    Participant

    you dont have to be right to enjoy a thread you know. :rolleyes: these forums are pretty much for all of us to share our ideas and knowledge with each other and to learn from each other. and sometimes the learning process involves being wrong.

    i seriously doubt that anyone here has been right 100% of the time. so if all your here to do is to try and promote your own fixed opinons with little regard for what the evidence says and cannot accept the possiblity that you might be wrong, then im not sure you’ll enjoy any serious discussion very well.

    if you wish to convince others that your view is correct, then you need to back up your views with tangable, or at the very least, logical and believable theroies. and also to expain away the contradicting evidence in a similar fashion.

    so, do you want to try again, or do you just want to go play in your little corner convinced that everyone else is being stubben and inflexable, and unable to face the possibility that they might be wrong?

    in reply to: Congrats to new mods :) #2691780
    plawolf
    Participant

    no, just finding it ammusing how some are turning uncomfortably in their seats, now that the new mods are likely to spare the rest of us from their pointless flame posts. :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Iraqi prisoners 'abused' #1992531
    plawolf
    Participant

    Plawolf, many of the soldiers went to Iraq to protect their own countries as many believed that Hussian was an immediate threat (because of Blair). However, if I was in charge of an army and someone refused to do as I said then I would have them thrown out. I think that is fair, and most of them didnt want to get thrown out.

    and? how is that any different then the view i already expressed? :confused:

    in reply to: Iraqi prisoners 'abused' #1992534
    plawolf
    Participant

    are you saying these 4 men actively sought war on iraqis? please by all means provide the proof that these 4 men “pretty much do what they want (and do)”. are you justifying the execution of the italian?

    what kinds of security guards are you talking about? and could you please explain what “your local co-op” means?

    based on what i have read, Fabrizio Quattrocchi (man who was executed) went to Iraq to earn enough money so he could buy a house with his fiancee and start a family. below is a link to the bbc article on Fabrizio.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/3629989.stm

    well these 4 men might not have went to iraq to kill iraqis, but they knew that by taking that job they were placing themselves in a situation where they would very likely have been required to shoot and kill iraqis, and they obviously didnt have a problem with that or they would not have stayed. things in iraq didnt just go down the toilet overnight.

    ‘co-op’ is a well known UK supermarket chain. would you like to have armed foriegners standing gaurd outside your local supermarket knowing that if one of them shot you, he would most likely never have to answer for it?

    ‘security consultants’ arent just men who go around and tell you where you should put ur burgler alerm, not in iraq at least anyways. did you know that there are more private ‘security consultants’ working in iraq then the whole british army in iraq? what we are seeing is effective privatiastion of war and occupation, but unlike professional soilders, these private sector warriors dont have to answer to anyone but their bosses, who mostly dont care about the welfare of the iraqi people they are supposed to ‘protect’.

    foreign ‘security consultants’ are just a politcially correct term refered to hired guns or mercinaries.

    sure, most of them probably have a family and a sob story waiting back at home. but so does the iraqis that many of them have killed, but we hardly hear of those stories. and unlike them, the iraqis didnt choose to put themselves in that polition.

    i dont support the way the iraqis have taken them prosioner and have killed prisioners, but my view is that if you cant stand the heat, stay out of the kitchen. those men knew the risks and accpeted them (thats why they get such fat paychecks), so they cant blame anyone but themselves for putting themselves in that position.

    in reply to: J-10 MASS Production Starts. #2691801
    plawolf
    Participant

    Bull$hit. Try hard, but you’ll never find a single part in the Lavi lifted from the F-16. Even the intake is different.

    Why not?
    In a way it’s true.

    Listen all, this is really getting to nowhere. Non of us has enough knowledge of either Israel’s aviation industry or China’s.
    IMHO, you have to be really blind in order not to see the traces of the Lavi in the J-10. Maybe it’s because I’m not just an internet warrior, and I actually do some research. I been studying the Lavi project, the IAI and the whole aviation sales related security system of Israel. For example, you find an atricle from 1994 saying that “China has completed the building of a Lavi plane in cooperation with Israel”, and that’s without having any pics of the plane to demonstrate of how really the two planes are similar, and a few years later when we can see good pics of the J-10, it is similar to the Lavi. Coincidence?
    Everyone in entitled to his opinion.

    oh this is getting funny now. everybody can see the similarities between the LAVI and F16, yet u claim the two are completely and utterly different. even though the US is israeil’s biggest benefictor and american military secrets are an open book to israel.

    on the other hand, you seem convinced that J10 is a LAVI with a different hairdo, and tries to conveniently explain away the obvious and vast differences as only being a result of redesign work on the part of the chinese, despite the glaring fact that such redesign work would be just as difficult is not more so then simply making a new design from scratch, and the fact that both china and israel have vermently denied any transfer of LAVI tech.

    some people try too hard. :rolleyes:

    plawolf
    Participant

    how does the story of china refusing to give NK J10s fighters (what is NK going to use to pay for these fighters? chinese hand outs? :rolleyes: ) have anything to do with ‘hard ball’, pakistan or vietnam?

    in reply to: Congrats to new mods :) #2691809
    plawolf
    Participant

    lol, mr serial flamer getting nervous or something? :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Iraqi prisoners 'abused' #1992646
    plawolf
    Participant

    i consider them non-combatants since they were not actively seeking war on any of the belligerents, they were private security guards.

    hmm, they went into another nation without the invitions of the locals to fight and kill if necessary for foreign companies. also, since they dont belong to any armed forces, they are under no-one’s juristiction and can pretty much do what they want (and do). i wonder if you would want any of these kinds of ‘security gaurds’ ourside your local co-op. :rolleyes:

    they were highly paid mercinaries, and i have little sympathy for such people. at least the soilders signed on to defend their nation, what else but money did these people go to iraq for?

    in reply to: J-10 MASS Production Starts. #2692133
    plawolf
    Participant

    All I suggest about are roots (mainly aerodynamic).

    by your logic, the works of every single student is a copy or offshoot of his teacher’s ideas. :rolleyes: 😮

    in reply to: Iraqi prisoners 'abused' #1992996
    plawolf
    Participant

    “Also a few weeks ago an Italian non-combatant was executed on tape and sent to Al-Jazeera but was not shown”

    were they non-combatants? cos i recall seeing an unloaded MP5 in the background of the pics of the three.

Viewing 15 posts - 2,146 through 2,160 (of 4,042 total)