dark light

43-2195

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 200 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: I really fail to see how… #800055
    43-2195
    Participant

    I really fail to see how this new layout is an improvement on the old format.

    in reply to: Facebook Restoration Threads #776203
    43-2195
    Participant

    P-40N-1-CU A29-446, search Hopper Warbirds on facebook.

     link :

    https://www.facebook.com/SWPA1942/

    in reply to: Our Last Battle of Britain Pilot Has Died #804939
    43-2195
    Participant

    We did lose a very special person. We lost bernard.

    in reply to: RAF P-39 service career #817399
    43-2195
    Participant

    The cancellation of the RAF P322 put a huge workload back onto lockheed. The P-38G-15-LO models are some of that order. You will find on many emgineering drawings that many cover the earlier G models up to -10, but do not apply to the -15. Incorporating the P322 back into P-38 production created two models G-15 and F-15 (I think) which carry multiple differences to previous F & G models. Interesting the extent of the workload created and yet the RAF hardly touched them.

    in reply to: Fw 190's 'found in Turkey (not another Burma surely) #836844
    43-2195
    Participant

    We already have a thread for this topic. Please don’t start another one.

    http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?140468-Up-To-50-FW190s-May-Be-Recovered-Flyable-Or-Scrap

    in reply to: Nighthawking, a new word to me! #837944
    43-2195
    Participant

    There you go, my rant wasn’t so bad after all.

    in reply to: Strange things happening on this forum #839107
    43-2195
    Participant

    I’ve given up editing my posts from my mobile. Every time I select edit, it deletes my post.

    in reply to: Nighthawking, a new word to me! #839199
    43-2195
    Participant

    I don’t think my views are in line with the majority of forum members on this topic. Governments have an obligation to their servicemembers to give them a proper burial. Especially if they know where the servicemembers remains lie. Wartime aircraft crashsites are not sacred ground once the servicemembers remains have been removed. There is nothing on a Consolidated B-24 Bomber that I would consider a “Treasure Trove” . Goverments have an obligation to remove and dispose of ordinance. Private collectors play an important role in preserving vintage aeroplanes. Many members of the public with no intetest in old aeroplanes, save vintage aircraft components because of a perceived value of those parts. Without private collectors that perception of value would not exist. Governments that don’t recover and bury their dead servicemembers, that don’t provide adequate funding to museums to honor and promote those sacrifices, have no right to interfere with private collectors who are trying to cover their governments shortfalls.
    Just my rant for the day.

    in reply to: Amelia In The News Again. #839290
    43-2195
    Participant

    Dave’s (RPM.FF.TGT…) Website is actually a damn good read. He’s put an enourmous amount of work into the research and paid alot of money out of his own pocket to travel to Papua New Guinea ( multiple trips) to search for the missing Lockheed. I strongly recommend you take a good look at his website.

    in reply to: Nighthawking, a new word to me! #839335
    43-2195
    Participant

    If your government know the remains are in the ground, why don’t they recover them and give them the proper military buriel to which they are entitled to (and rightly deserve). Together with a memorial marker for the community to remember them and honor their sacrifice.

    in reply to: Nighthawking, a new word to me! #839679
    43-2195
    Participant

    Just exactly what do the diggers hope to gain, and the UK Government think they are losing?

    in reply to: Tail Wheel AH7180 #850832
    43-2195
    Participant

    Innocent till proven guilty. Wouldn’t all the dambuster’s tailwheels have to be accounted for in order to prove that it isn’t?

    43-2195
    Participant

    One of the professional pilot forums I frequent has a highlighted notice at the head of the page which states posters can be held legally responsible for their posts and that the forum owner can be made to hand over forum members details. I believe the notice went up after defamation action over a posters comments. Perhaps keypu lishing should have a similar notice to users.

    43-2195
    Participant

    Many years ago I had a professional ebayer shut down, and banned from ebay. He had used many excuses for a delay in sending the item and eventually he sent me a message saying he had my money and had no intention of shipping the item. I showed the messages to ebay and he was removed.

    HOWEVER, within a couple of weeks he was back on ebay with a different seller name and a feed back of zero. So, ultimately, ebay doesn’t care.

    As I said, this was years ago. Today their automated dispute settlement will just waste your time, antagonize you and give you no real satisfaction.

    43-2195
    Participant

    Very well written Malcom Mckay and very true. All that I will add is that the accused and more likely their (often no win no pay ) solicitor will usually do an asset search first to make sure your worth pursuing Which is generally why assets (warbirds included) are not held outright in the owners names.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 200 total)