dark light

43-2195

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 200 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: FAA Aircraft Serial Query #929082
    43-2195
    Participant

    Thanks very much Gentlemen, I will acquire the Air Britain book. Snafu, can you confirm your post, that ALL wartime FAA individual aircraft history cards were destroyed in the 1950s? That seems incredible. I know Australia and the USA have kept all theirs, and I believe all the RAF cards have been kept as well. How do historians research without these cards?

    My understanding is that in early 1945 the USN reduced their presence at Manus Island, and the FAA took over the facilities vacated(several airfields and installations across quite a few islands). Most if not all of the FAA aircraft dumped off Australia’s East Coast had been withdrawn to Australia from Manus. I’m wondering if any remaining at Manus at wars end were dumped there? Anybody have information about this?

    in reply to: Sad state of affairs #956756
    43-2195
    Participant

    Key publishings “Flypast” magazine already has a classifieds section in the back of it, doesn’t it? So according to Moggy, if you run a classified in “Flypast” , then you can advertise on here.

    in reply to: DB601 / Ha-40 Engine Question #961242
    43-2195
    Participant

    Thanks JPC_Aero, The J-aircraft link was very helpful. I wonder if putting Bosch 601 injectors into the Ha-40 will improve operation? Or even if they will fit. I have some DB601 sparkplugs, I’ll try fitting them to the Ha-40 first and see if it’s achievable. Jerry Yagen has a Ki-61 close to completion at Precision Aero Productions in Australia. He has a reasonably good Ha-40 for it, but they are having difficulty finding needed parts. Given the DB601 is more common, with some parts availability, perhaps re-engining it with a DB601 would make more sense

    in reply to: So who was first – Mustang or Lightning? #964042
    43-2195
    Participant

    Why don’t we take a P-38 and a P-51 150nm offshore and shut down an engine on each aircraft. Then the P-51 fans can tell me over the radio which is the better aircraft. Don’t believe I will have to put up with their bleating for too long.

    And America’s two highest scoring aces scored all their kills in?

    in reply to: Here's an oddity #965090
    43-2195
    Participant

    Consul and Viscount, I am extremely impressed by both of your depths of knowledge on this matter. I strongly suspect that you both have anoraks hanging on coat hooks near your respective front doors. In fact Viscount sounds like he may also have a log book with First Officers name and flight time recorded. I hope all this information is recorded somewhere other than the internet.

    in reply to: DB601 / Ha-40 Engine Question #965095
    43-2195
    Participant

    Thanks low’n’slow. I suspect Kawasaki’s ability to manufacture aircraft engines in 1941, 1942 and 1943, was far superior to the restoration companies of 2014 building new components to original drawings. I also believe that materials available during that period were not (yet) affected by war shortages. If they had Daimler Benz drawings, then I cant understand why parts would not be interchangeable. High performance engines work to very fine tolerances, so Kawasaki must have produced quality products, or the Ki-61 would never have achieved the margin of success which it did.
    I am vaguely aware of an internal engine fault whereby a lubricating or cooling port was either missed entirely, or poorly placed which contributed to engine failures. But I believe this was a stand alone error, not indicative of the overall engine manufacture quality.
    I would certainly welcome input from anyone with experience of DB601s (or Ha-40s, he adds hopefully).

    in reply to: P-47D radio fit #1000849
    43-2195
    Participant

    The standard fit out to the P-40, P-38 and P-51 were either SCR-274N or SCR-522. I would think the P-47 would have been the same. The P-39, because it was older started with a different radio(SCR-285, I think), but by wars end was also using the 274 or 522. I own two complete SCR-274N sets, the usual fighter set up had 2 Transmitters (BC-457A[4 – 5.3 MC], BC-458A [5.5 – 7 MC)and Three recievers(BC-453A [190-550 KC], BC-454A[3 – 6 MC], BC-455A[6 – 9.1 MC]). The transmitting freqs were set before flight, but the recievers were controlled by 3 coffee grinder style controls(BC-450A) in the cockpit. The set uses a BC-456 Modulator and a BC-442A Antena Relay Unit. On the P-40 this equipment is located on three shelves located on the left side as you open the Radio Compartment door(mid way along the rear fuselage on the left side), on the P-38s the equipment is located behind the pilot on the upper surface of the centre wing section. The P-51 is similar to the P-38, ie behind the pilot and I think the P-47 radio sets are located inside the removable panel located above the trailing edge of the wing on the right side of the fuselage. Manuals, radios and further reading is widely available on Ebay.

    in reply to: New Guinea 1945 on Facebook today ! #1000853
    43-2195
    Participant

    Nope, Biak….It’s a published Time-Life photograph. Abandoned by an Air Depot Group. The buried ones are at Finschhafen in PNG. The 15th ADG also buried aircraft in Townsville in 45. But the Australian scrapers dug them up soon after they had departed.

    in reply to: Flt Sgt Copping's P-40 From The Egyptian Desert #931124
    43-2195
    Participant

    Take it to the press and shine a big bright spotlight on it. Let your MPs know the press are running with it. It’s all very well to sit back and let the public service perform it’s duties in the fullness of time. But in this case the public service are saying the matter is closed. And, to any intelligent and informed person, it obviously is still very much an open case with leads not followed.
    I have a new G4m crashsite here in PNG, we notified the Japanese embassy, who told us to notify the PNG National Museum, which we then did and nothing has happened in 2 years. We are now notifying the G4m reunion associations in Japan in the hope that they will bring political pressure to the case. The site is littered with bones, and the landowners are not impressed with the lack of respect and action they have witnessed.
    The US JPAC operate on similar time scales, but they do act, they liase with the public and they stress that the sites not be visited or disturbed. So action does take place………….in the fullness of (public service)time.

    in reply to: Seen on ebay 2014 #932282
    43-2195
    Participant

    Worth more as a Whitley leg. Has he changed the details?

    in reply to: Seen on eBay – 2013! #945568
    43-2195
    Participant

    Bf-109G Instrument Panel in Aluminium. I thought the originals were all wooden. Does anyone know if any “G” models did actually have aluminium instrument panels?

    http://www.ebay.de/itm/Geratebrett-Bf109-G-Messerschmitt-Luftwaffe-/201004746446?pt=Transportwesen&hash=item2eccd106ce

    in reply to: Seeking Spitfire Canopy rail suppliers #951755
    43-2195
    Participant

    QLD Spitty, when you say, ” Travelled down”, ” the old project” and “the boys”, you make it sound as if your no longer actively involved in it! What gives? Are you still holding the bucking bar?

    in reply to: P38 On Welsh Beach – So-called, by a few "Maid Of Harlech" #968209
    43-2195
    Participant

    Stihl make an excellent walkabout cut off saw. Would see her off that beach in a matter of hours. Save the public coffers 250 to 500 thousand quid. And provide lots of useful patterns for manufacturing replacement parts. If you were thoughtful, you might even be able to use the recovered sections to make assembly jigs. Oh, and for around the 500,000 pounds mentioned previously, I dare say Precision Aerospace productions in Australia could build you an airworthy centre section.
    Or we could just invite conflict archaeologists to get involved…….

    in reply to: Yale and Harvard Frames #984374
    43-2195
    Participant

    The major problem at the end of the day though, is you would spend at least two to three times what the finished machine fetch on the market. For example, it is reputed that certain collector bought a Wirraway recently at significantly less than half what it cost to rebuild back in the 90’s, and it was a very good, very complete project to begin with.

    Recovering, restoring, owning, displaying and flying warbirds. Is NOT a profitable venture. Yes, very large numbers are involved, but that is NOT profit. If the Mark I Harvard floats your boat, and your using your own money. By all means go ahead and enjoy yourself. You are doing the world a favour and a very small percentage of the people on the planet will be grateful to you. And, yes, some idiots will critisize you. “Such is life”.

    43-2195
    Participant

    I suspect we all have stories akin to these. Something of true value within our grasp, but for a cruel twist of fate, it is lost forever.

    But the truth is that Do17s look alot more intact on sonar pictures than they do on the surface covered in marine growth and corroded. Our mind sees things as we would like them to be rather than allow reality to tell us other wise. This is particularly true of our memory. I have returned to several crashsites over the years, seeking parts that I knew were there from a previous visit, only to discover the reason I never recovered the part in the first instance was because it was; corroded, cracked damaged, powder. My memory remembered that that hard to source part existed there but not the true condition it was in.

    The P-51 canopy pictures look great, just like a P-51 canopy should look. But now. all these years later, pin hole corrosion, magnesium turned to powder, perspex brittle and cracked. The photos and the story are more valuable than what remains of the canopy.

    After all, is not life just just a brief exciting story.

    Quite deep for a Saturday morning, isn’t it?

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 200 total)