dark light

Gauntlet

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 170 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: SU-33 take off without catapult? #2592925
    Gauntlet
    Participant

    su25 variation is used for strike missions, with its larger wing, but that one too can use just part of its full potential payload/range.

    The navalized Su-25UTG used onboard the Kuznetsov is not used for strike missions. Its only used for carrier training. Infact, I belive they’ve removed most of the weaponsystems onboard it.

    As for the Flanker-D, they can take off without the need of catapults, but as said above me, it realy limit their range and/or payload. The largest weapon load I have seen on a Flanker-D operation out from a carrier is something like 2x wingtip AA-11 Archers, and 2x inboard AA-10 Alamo (both beeing trainingmissiles, though). And this was only possible when they started the take-off run far back on the deck, on take-off position 3.

    http://img159.imageshack.us/img159/8456/su33readyfortakeofffromkuznets.jpg

    And as I pointed out in a previous thread about the Su-33, heres a pic proving that the Kuznetsov do not have to be moving to allow her planes to take-off. Just too bad the Su-33 does not carry any weapons at all here.

    http://img71.imageshack.us/img71/9933/su33leavesskijumponkuznetsov4q.jpg

    in reply to: Russian Su-33 Flanker-D pictures. #2594961
    Gauntlet
    Participant

    *bump*

    I’m sorry to bring life back to this soon to be 1 month old thread, but I recently discovered a new tactical marking on a Flanker-D.

    In Yefim Gordon’s “Russian Air Power” (ISBN: 1840372400), I found a small picture showing a Flanker-D coded “78 Red” with its nose opened up. I can scan it and post it here over the weekend sometime.

    Anyone else have anything “new”?

    in reply to: Kuznetsov vs Vikramaditya #2057539
    Gauntlet
    Participant

    Thanks for the corrections Gollevainen, and thanks for the profile Snake.

    Better now?

    http://img147.imageshack.us/img147/4190/admiralkuznetsovhangarsizecopy1.jpg

    in reply to: Kuznetsov vs Vikramaditya #2057633
    Gauntlet
    Participant

    I have not read anything to suggest to me that the Mig-29K will be the only fighter embarked on the refitted Gorshkov. Why does everyone assume there will be no Harriers on board too?

    For one thing: Ease of maintainace if you have fewer types of aircrafts.

    in reply to: Kuznetsov vs Vikramaditya #2057648
    Gauntlet
    Participant

    Hi guys.

    I was fooling around with photoshop this morning, and decided to try to sketch how large the Kuznetsov/Varjag hangar realy is. Using Gollevainen’s measurements (153 x 26), it turned out something like this:

    http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/4824/admiralkuznetsovhangarsize5jd.jpg

    Judging from pics taken from the hangar, this seems to be more or less correct.

    What do you guys think?

    Oh, and do anyone have a better profile drawing/blueprint of Kuznetsov/Varjag?

    in reply to: Need help with some Hind pictures #2602803
    Gauntlet
    Participant

    wow…simply wow…

    Thank you very much Flex! You saved my day! 🙂

    in reply to: Aviation – Plain Naval Avia Discusion Thread #2560932
    Gauntlet
    Participant

    I can continue the thread by pointing out that the Kuznetsov does not need to be moving for Flanker-Ds to take off. This is something many refusese to belive.

    Heres a pic to prove it:
    http://img71.imageshack.us/img71/9933/su33leavesskijumponkuznetsov4q.jpg

    But again, the planes launched from Kuznetsov normally carry aroun 2x Archers. Thats to little for fleet air defence.

    I wan’t to continue by asking a question:
    Do anyone know the hangar space provided on the Kuznetsov?
    Since the Shipwreck launcers under the forward deck take up alot of space, I’m guessing the space left for the hanger is not that large. Anyony got exact measurements?

    http://img79.imageshack.us/img79/391/parkedinkuznetsovsunderdeckhan.jpg

    On this pic I can count around 10-12 Flankers, and the hangar seems to be cramped full. Anyone got a shot like this from a US carrier?

    in reply to: Sukhoi Su-34(Su-27IB) #2561022
    Gauntlet
    Participant

    Just read this on DefenceTalk.com:

    Russian Air Force to add 24 newest warplanes by 2010 – Russia’s Defense Ministry
    Itar-Tass News Agency
    Fri, 24 Mar 2006, 11:50

    NOVOSIBIRSK: Russia’s Defense Ministry will purchase a regiment of 24 newest Su-34 planes for the Air Force by 2010, Deputy Prime Minister, Defense Minister Sergei Ivanov told reporters on Thursday.

    “Everything has been coordinated and decided upon in a short-term perspective. The Defense Ministry was granted the right from 2004 to conclude long-term three-year contacts with defense companies. As a result, two batch-production Su-34 planes will be purchased in 2006, six in 2007, ten in 2008, with purchases increasing in coming years. Therefore, we have to buy a whole regiment of 24 Su-34 planes in 2010,” the deputy prime minister said.

    Air Force chief Vladimir Mikhailov, who is accompanying Ivanov on his tour of Siberian defense firms, told reporters that two Su-34 have already been manufactured and soon will be supplied to the army.

    “It is planned to purchase in the future ten such aircraft each year,” he said.

    According to the Defense Ministry, the Air Force currently has ten regiments of frontline Su-24 bombers, which will be gradually replaced by new Su-34 fighter-bombers.

    The Air Force has 222 Su-24 planes and 100 Su-24MP reconnaissance planes.

    Speaking about the modernization of defense sector companies, Ivanov said it should be implemented at the expense of the Investment Fund, not the Stabilization Fund.

    “We need to re-equip companies of the defense-industrial complex, because otherwise we’ll be unable to develop quality and competitive military hardware. But I doubt that we have to take money from the Stabilization Fund, because there is the Investment Fund available,” said the deputy prime minister who in charge for defense sector problems in the Cabinet.

    “There’s another side to the issue. There are companies that invest their own funds, derived from profit, in the reequipping of production assets,” Ivanov said.

    For example, the Chkalov aircraft company purchased two high-tech machine tools with its own money, which are as effective as a whole shop.

    “One shouldn’t make the federal budget carry 100 percent of expenses,” the deputy premier said.

    NAPO is the largest producer of Su planes. It is part of the Sukhoi aviation holding company. It produces Su-34 fighter-bombers and An-38-120 multi-purpose planes and participates in the program of developing the RRJ regional plane. It also upgrades Su-24M bombers.

    Introduction of Su-34 will create export potential – official
    RIA Novosti
    Fri, 24 Mar 2006, 12:03

    NOVOSIBIRSK: The introduction of Russia’s latest fighter-bomber into active service with the country’s air force will make the plane more attractive on global export markets, the head of the corporation producing the aircraft said Thursday.

    “Widespread use of the Su-34 following its purchase by the Russian Air Force will boost sales on external arms markets,” Sukhoi holding Director General Mikhail Pogosyan said.

    Defense Minister Sergei Ivanov earlier said his ministry planned to purchase 18 Su-34 Fullback fighter-bombers in 2006-2008, and equip an air force regiment with 24 of the new aircraft by 2010.

    Pogosyan also said the introduction of the Su-34 would play an important part in the future of the Chkalov Aircraft Production Association in Novosibirsk, West Siberia, where the new plane is being manufactured.

    “Annual production of 15-20 Su-34 will see the enterprise working at optimal capacity,” he said, adding that production could ensure stable sales and lower the plane’s production costs.

    The $36-million Su-34 fighter-bomber is a two-seat strike aircraft equipped with twin AL-31MF afterburning turbojet engines. It is designed to deliver high-precision strikes at heavily guarded targets in any weather conditions, day or night, and fields weaponry including a 30mm GSh-301 cannon, up to 12 Alamo or Archer AAMs, ASMs, and bombs.

    It is designed to replace the Su-24 Fencer frontline bombers in the Air Force.

    in reply to: Army/Navy subfora issues thread #2561054
    Gauntlet
    Participant

    What? Are you implying that US & UK intelligence agencies closed down the Navy & Army forum…?

    As for the closedown, I will relay miss the Navy forum, but a decision have been made, and we have to deal with it… 🙁

    in reply to: Single F/A Jet Inventory. #2562113
    Gauntlet
    Participant

    In no way I am placing the F-22 on the top of the list. Just that as far as the Euro is concerned, its own web site accepts the superiority of the F-22. I don’t.

    I tend to go with the Russians. Whether it be Su-47 or even better SU-37.

    Surprise, surprise… :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Single F/A Jet Inventory. #2562127
    Gauntlet
    Participant

    Well, the way I see it, I think the EF2000 has a more multirole combat ability. Meaning, if my air force was going to have only one warplane, it have to handle both planes and ground.

    in reply to: Single F/A Jet Inventory. #2562135
    Gauntlet
    Participant

    Heh’. The Su-47 is nothing but an overrated tech-demostrator.
    Good luck getting up in high speed in that one without the wings twisting! 😉

    One plane, eh? I would have to choose the EF2000 ‘Typhoon’.

    in reply to: F-22 "downed" 5 F-15C #2562436
    Gauntlet
    Participant

    Nothing new there . our sea harriers do that most weeks of the year take out 5 f15s and 4 tornados and a few jags in a mornings work, Sadly as of this month the sea harrier willbe no more for the uk,
    theres a bit on this report from a day to day sortie . this is fact and not fiction like the F22 case .sae sortie 5 x F15c kills+

    I’m extremly interested to read more information regarding that encounter. Under what circumstances? How many Sea Harriers were involved?

    in reply to: F-22 "downed" 5 F-15C #2562645
    Gauntlet
    Participant

    Link for source?

    Gauntlet
    Participant

    Why…?

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 170 total)